*California officially out of money*, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 09:53 PM by Ex_MislTech
Originally posted by SpencerJ
reply to
post by Ex_MislTech



How would a statewide convention be the basis for an amero?

As is, our current fiscal impasse is not new. It's been around 20 years, and the timebomb has finally activated. If that doesn't warrant some significant action, I don't know what will. People need to know that this isn't just for the politicians to settle now. And only a constitutional convention will wake them up.

You think they're going to tolerate some gerrymandering on such a critical issue as this? Or seriously throw out all our civil liberties? Plus, we always have the option of a "limited" constitutional convention, which as far as I know, is unbreachable at the state level (but can be loopholed at the federal). We don't have to throw the baby out with the bath water. But something's gotta give.


They will use a moment of crisis to sell a single choice.

This will likely be the unraveling of this:

100's of Trillions in derivatives set to collapse per Warren Buffett

Yes, that is Trillions with a T, not Billions.

He knew the disaster was coming back in 2002, and 1 year ago
the Wall Street journal's marketwatch warned all their readers.

When this fake Malthusian catastrophe ensues, we will be offered two
choices, one is the NAU and the Amero the other is collapse of
the US into total financial ruin and auctioning of properties to
European bankers who setup this Carpet Bagger's dream.

Make no mistake, this was was intentional to loot the country
through fancy paperwork, and deceit.


reply posted on 5-2-2009 @ 02:23 AM by wutone
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
Speaking as a State employee, on the other hand, the Governor's furlough program is meant as a sleazy attempt to not only coerce concessions from the state employees Union; it is meant to "break" the Union itself, leaving the state employees at the "mercy" of the Governor and his minions.


The state and the employee's Union have been in contract negotiations since at least June of 2008. The Union has offered an number of concessions, and even a list of possible budgetary savings options.

All have been rejected by the state negotiation team.


The Governor realizes that if he can break the employee's Union, he can break the employees.

If the state employees are broken, there is nothing to stop him from "outsourcing" more jobs to his political and financial supporters in the private sector; read India, Indonesia, South Korea, etc..

More pork for His barrel!


More political capital to grease his way into his next "role".


Exactly what concessions are the unions trying to make?

It has been decades since there were any significant layoffs among state employees.

State employees get fatter benefits and better paychecks than many of their private sector counterparts.

How exactly is a furlough going to break a union especially when it is only a couple days a month?

Exactly how is Arnold going to outsource state jobs? Is he going to get a bunch of Indians and Chinese to start teaching and guard prisons?? Is he going to get a boatload of Vietnamese to staff the DMV?? At least some of the DMV booklets are printed to their language.

Is he going to replace the entire state bureaucracy with illegal immigrants?? Hell both are bleeding the state of billions so might as well kick out the current bureaucracy and put the illegals to work, save money, and still retain the same quality.

The state unions are giving up NOTHING. They insist on zero cuts and are pressuring their democrat legislature buddies to raise taxes in order to make up for the shortfall caused by the bad economy.

Sorry but the economy sucks right now. The taxpayers of California are suffering and MORE taxes to FEED the unions and their FAT benefits along with the BLOATED spending programs is the last thing we need.



reply posted on 5-2-2009 @ 02:48 AM by SpencerJ
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
Speaking as a State employee, on the other hand, the Governor's furlough program is meant as a sleazy attempt to not only coerce concessions from the state employees Union; it is meant to "break" the Union itself, leaving the state employees at the "mercy" of the Governor and his minions.

The state and the employee's Union have been in contract negotiations since at least June of 2008. The Union has offered an number of concessions, and even a list of possible budgetary savings options.


What kind of concessions have been on the table? I know there have been some made, but what have they seriously offered up and how much would it close the deficit by exactly? You probably have your answer there.


All have been rejected by the state negotiation team.

The Governor realizes that if he can break the employee's Union, he can break the employees.


Actually, you're on the right track. It has been one of his intentions from the beginning to reduce union power, which in my mind, is a good thing. Your special interests are what truly cripple this state, blocking any chance at reforming anything that lessens dependence or increases the amount of energy you must expend defending your reputations in such an environment. Teachers, firefighters, nurses, are the biggest ones, and this retribution has been long overdue.


If the state employees are broken, there is nothing to stop him from "outsourcing" more jobs to his political and financial supporters in the private sector; read India, Indonesia, South Korea, etc...


Hah? What? Contracting maybe, but what is he planning on outsourcing? The union interests are weeds, folks. This guy's post proves it. His logic doesn't follow at all.


More political capital to grease his way into his next "role"


Why does this sound like a conspiratorial rant more than anything else? More capital for his next "role"? Wtf. So he's making connections with the people he's outsourcing or victims of who he's outsourced? Either one doesn't make much sense. Flat out diatribe.

Look, the point is pure simple: unions here wield too much power. Arnold, as a businessman, has realized it's been his responsibility to weed you guys out of influence 6 years now and has only started doing anything about it now.


reply posted on 8-2-2009 @ 10:54 AM by SpencerJ
reply to post by Thistled



Your snide remarks are not necessary, thank you very much.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Mainstream Media IGNORES Iceland Revolution
  Posted 7 days ago with 96 member flags
Paul says “Next Crisis will be More Destructive”
  Posted 19 days ago with 29 member flags
Nigel Farage: The EU Titanic Has Now Hit The Iceberg
  Posted 17 days ago with 26 member flags
Here Are The 5 Worst Places To Be When The Dollar Collapses
  Posted 3 days ago with 19 member flags
The Coming Canadian Housing Crash
  Posted 13 days ago with 18 member flags
What is *THE* domino you\'re waiting for, and why?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Greece bank run
  Posted 11 days ago with 15 member flags
Facebook insider sales are huge red flags
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags