It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient
to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall by punished as a court-martial may direct.”
Originally posted by jerico65
reply to post by HunkaHunka
And how is allowing gays in the military "supporting" us?
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
When that war comes gays will be begging to be excluded from the military and the draft. I will shrug and simply say well you get what you asked for, now load your bags on the pallet and move to the flight line with the rest of the chalk.
Author wrote on history of gays in U.S. military
By Elaine Woo
December 16, 2007 in print edition B-11
-snip-
Berube interviewed about 70 veterans, including military psychiatrists, but also drew upon government documents, newspaper and magazine clippings, archival photos, diaries and the letters.
He found that gays and lesbians held jobs in the military that defied stereotypes. They served in combat, drove tanks, cared for the wounded, flew bombers, deciphered enemy codes and collected intelligence.
-snip-
Using sex researcher Alfred Kinsey’s surveys of the general population, Berube estimated that the number of gays who served in the war ranged from 650,000 to 1.6 million.
LATimes
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
There is absolutely no reason at all for "sexual preference" to be acknowledged in the military.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
There is absolutely no reason at all for "sexual preference" to be acknowledged in the military.
If that's what you believe, then would you support a policy whereby heterosexuality would not be allowed to be revealed or acknowledged? No posters of women, no pictures of wives, no talk of having sex with anyone, no revealing of marriages or family pictures. Nothing personal about relationships or sexual preferences at all?
If they would institute a policy whereby a male soldier revealing that he likes women would be discharged, I would support it. I'm just looking for equality here.
I don't want someone that is openly gay giving me mouth to mouth, or blood.
Even if I lived, the teasing would be relentless. "Recall getting some tongue?" and such stupid stuff as that. I don't want HIV, I don't want any of it.
Truly at times a crude, crude bunch. Crude but loyal, honorable, and would drop their shield just to cover you. Brothers in arms are closer than real, blood brothers.
Don't mess it up.
Wayno, I'm smiling when I say this, and I'm saying this with a bit of wry humor in mind, but you're perverted.
Originally posted by paxnatus
Why do you think being in the military is equal to living in everyday society?
Please give a reason that having an open policy regarding the acknowledgement of being gay in the military would be a benefit in applicable terms.
We have all heard you regarding civil rights and equality and how it is not fair!!
Originally posted by paxnatus
I personally can't see how he can take on something so controversial at the beginning of his term. Wonder what the military has to say? We didn't become the strongest military
in the world without strict guidelines.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by paxnatus
Why do you think being in the military is equal to living in everyday society?
I don't.
Please give a reason that having an open policy regarding the acknowledgement of being gay in the military would be a benefit in applicable terms.
Some of those people in the military are gay. It would benefit them to be able to talk about their lives (to those who are open to it), their relationships, see pictures of their loved ones, just like the heterosexual servicemen and women do. As it is, they have to hide who they are and keep their mouths shut about their relationships.
If that's not a real benefit, then straight soldiers should be willing to give it up, too.
I understand you think if a soldier knows that his buddy is gay, he's not going to be able to do his job because of being "distracted", but I don't believe that. I think it's an excuse. What if a he was "distracted" because his fellow service member was from Thailand? What if a he was "distracted" because his fellow service member was a Muslim? Would we tell all the Muslims they had to keep it to themselves?
We have all heard you regarding civil rights and equality and how it is not fair!!
I also understand those who disagree with me here would rather just toss the Constitution aside when it comes to the military because the military is a special circumstance. I don't buy that, either. It IS special circumstances, but it doesn't follow that the Constitution they are sworn to protect should be ignored.