FEMA Ordered 102,000 Boxcars With Shackles!, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 06:31 AM by detachedindividual
I'm not sold on this idea either.

But...
It makes sense that if a government need to prepare for massive civil unrest, and massive arrests as a result, they'll need transportation for those prisoners.

Look, you already have laws which allow you to be arrested and held indefinitely without charge. People are increasingly being arrested up and down your country for merely voicing their opinion in a protest.
It seems you can't have a peaceful protest in the US without hundreds of riot police acting like rabid dogs waiting in formation to take out the weakest of the herd with tear gas and batons.

FEMA, rightly or wrongly, have a responsibility to work with these laws and prepare to act. On paper it'll all make sense.
If the law states that you cannot protest legally, that you must be prevented from doing so and then detained, FEMA has a responsibility to include provisions for this scenario.
There are simply not enough police vehicles or detention centers known to the public to facilitate this, which is why we may see train transportation and the "camps" under the Rex 84 idea.

While there is little evidence to prove to me one way or another that this is in action/preparation, it seems only logical that it would be.

It is the job of FEMA to make preparations for the most likely scenarios, and massive civil unrest is a likely scenario along with terrorism and natural catastrophe. These latter scenarios are probably why these camps exist too, they're multipurpose sites that can either handle the evacuation of people from a danger zone by rail, the detention of people arriving by rail after or due to civil unrest, and the treatment of people in an outbreak etc.

It seems like quite a reasonable action when you really consider it. What is unreasonable, however, are the laws allowing citizens to be treated in such a way.
The people have a right to protest, and, as I'm sure I've seen, it was once encouraged by the founders of your laws that the people should rise up and remove power from your government should that government threaten your freedom and liberty.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 06:55 AM by ignorant_ape
reply to post by Evisscerator



where exactly are these 600mile + stretches of ` remote track ` ?? that never gets used other than to store these elusive " fema boxcars "


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 07:16 AM by detachedindividual
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to
post by Evisscerator



where exactly are these 600mile + stretches of ` remote track ` ?? that never gets used other than to store these elusive " fema boxcars "


There are locations all over every country capable of housing military supplies, emergency supplies, replacement infrastructure... just because they are not advertised as such does not mean these places do not exist. In fact, they are kept so secretive under the defense procedures of any nation.

I used to work at a sensitive site in the UK. It was a defense contractor, but the majority of people had no idea it was there or what they did on the site. It was just another company that happened to have a military contract with the government.

I can guarantee you that if such vehicles exist, they are held in several locations across the country, monitored and secure under defense contract, and probably with no visible signs of company ownership of the site.

I don't believe that a company would leave such things out in the open able to be stumbled upon (and damaged) by anyone. These companies would have a contract to fulfill and the security of such would involve insurance and maintenance also.

It doesn't prove the existence of these vehicles, but to deny the entire scenario because there are a few aspects that seem "unlikely" is idiotic.

Again, it is far more likely that the government and FEMA have made provisions for the transportation of massive numbers of detained people. They are paid to prepare for likely emergencies, and under current US law, the detention of massive numbers of people is a likely possibility as the economy becomes worse and the probability of civil unrest increases.

It's their job to think of these scenarios and prepare.
You should instead be arguing against the laws that make this a requirement. Why is it becoming a criminal act in the US to protest against your government?


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 07:37 AM by Telos
reply to post by Quarantine



Looks like to me that this is part of one of Phil Schneider's lectures back in 1995.

Schneider's Worries About Government Factions, Railroad Cars and Shackle Contracts

"Now, I am very worried about the activity of the federal government. They have lied to the public, stonewalled Senators, and have refused to tell the truth in regard to alien matters. I can go on and on. I can tell you that I am rather disgruntled. Recently, I knew someone who lived near where I live in Portland, Oregon. He worked at Gunderson Steel Fabrication where they make railroad cars. Now, I knew this fellow for the better part of 30 years, and he was kind of a quiet type. He came in to see me one day, excited, and he told me "they're building prisoner cars." He was nervous. Gunderson, he said, had a contract with the federal government to build 107,200 full length railroad cars, each with 143 pairs of shackles. There are 11 sub-contractors in this giant project. Supposedly, Gunderson got over 2 billion dollars for the contract. Bethlehem Steel and other steel outfits are involved. He showed me one of the cars in the railyards in North Portland. He was right. If you multiply 107,200 times 143 times 11, you come up with about 15,000,000. This is probably the number of people who disagree with the federal government. No more can you vote any of these people out of office. Our present structure of government is "technocracy," not democracy ,and it is a form of feudalism. It has nothing to do with the republic of the United States. These people are God-less, and have legislated out prayer in public schools. You can get fined up to $100,000 and two years in prison for praying in school. I believe we can do better. I also believe that the federal government is running the gambit of enslaving the people of the United States. I am not a very good speaker, but I'll keep shooting my mouth off until somebody puts a bullet in me, because it's worth it to talk to a group like this about these atrocities.

www.apfn.org... (scroll somewhere in the middle of the page)








reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 08:12 AM by detachedindividual
reply to post by wdkirk



As far as I see no one has suggested that the citizens are going to be attacked.

This thread is about the creation of vehicles for transporting large numbers of prisoners. I know what you are relating it to, but that is not what is being discussed here.

Again, FEMA are supposed to prepare for every major emergency. High on that list of probable emergencies is massive civil unrest.

Now, thinking logically, how do you propose a government would facilitate the following:

Arrest of dissidents/protesters/violent anarchists
Transportation of massive numbers of people away from urban areas
Detention of massive numbers of people

Now, assuming that there were several major incidents of terrorism or natural catastrophe in various cities:

How would you evacuate massive numbers of people?
How would you control these people to prevent the spread of disease or to control the dissent of the angry amongst them?
In what way would you facilitate the processing and treatment of these people?


If you actually consider all of these questions with a sensible attitude, you'll soon come to the conclusion that FEMA would use rail transport, when road access is likely out of the question in any of these situations. You'd also sensibly find that detention/treatment/processing facilities would also be needed, accessible by rail.

I can understand why people would refuse to accept such ideas, but FEMA would be neglecting their responsibilities if they DIDN'T plan in all these ways.

The extermination of a % of the population is another idea with no credibility or common sense, but everything else regarding prison transport and detention is extremely probable and likely in the increasingly possible climate of civil unrest.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 01:11 PM by musselwhite
reply to post by smarteye


you are one sick puppy but a positive one. i for one do not like your outlook on the situation and believe you need to rethink this one.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 01:28 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by smarteye


LOL.. that has been the way this problem has been soved for the last couple of thousand years... No mention of course of scrapping the money as debt with usury and the fractional reserve fraud game that causes the problem to begin with
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 17 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 16 hours ago, 114 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 12 hours ago, 98 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 10 hours ago, 63 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 14 hours ago, 50 replies