It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by IvanZana
You seem to have developed the 'I know everything disease'. So how do you account for the C-14 dates - let me guess you dismiss them with the Ivan intellect?
en.wikipedia.org...
One of the most frequent uses of radiocarbon dating is to estimate the age of organic remains from archaeological sites. When plants fix atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) into organic material during photosynthesis they incorporate a quantity of 14C that approximately matches the level of this isotope in the atmosphere (a small difference occurs because of isotope fractionation, but this is corrected after laboratory analysis).
Originally posted by Mozzy
very interesting stuff. seems like a little bit of ship jumping going on by someone, won't say who.
hans do the workers camps mention cheops anywhere or is this strictly a howard vyse phenomenon?
i think the construction of the pyramids is important but not so much as the attitude of the leaders at the time. i'd hate to think they sucked as bad as today's leadership. but enough pie in the sky,
If I find an ancient burried structure and i droppped my leather wallet or another organic material and then died. 2000 years in the future when they find that old structure and my wallet, is the structure as old as my wallet? c-14 says so.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by Mozzy
Oh you mean Ivan? Mr. No evidence? Yes he's the cost of doing discussions in an open forum. The old, I have no evidence so I'll try to cover it up by denying everything technique.....it is hilarious.
The only thing hillarious is your logic and lack of understanding in science, nature, archaeolgy, history and most of all common sense all while trying to pass yourself off as one.
Can you say pseudo-intellect?
I dont claim to know it all.
I just have an intelligent open mind.
You flat-earthers are still breeding?
Originally posted by Mozzy
is now a good time for topic change?
what about the grand gallery? are those "burn" marks in there or what?
The only inscription from the claimed pyramid builders are a series of hand written graphitti above the kings chamber. No hieroglyphs.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Ah Ivan
The only inscription from the claimed pyramid builders are a series of hand written graphitti above the kings chamber. No hieroglyphs.
You forgot that its a plural, there are inscriptions. No hieroglyphs?? Then how are they written?
jcolavito.tripod.com...
Within its walls no hieroglyph proclaims the name of the architect and no cartouche celebrates the life of the pharoah for whom it was built. When the caliph Mamum forced his way in over a thousand years ago, he found no record of who had built the massive structure. Not in the Subterranean Chamber, nor the so-called Queen's Chamber or even in the much-vaunted King's Chamber. Not until 1837 did any marking or identifier turn up within the pyramid's walls, and only then deep inside the secret relieving chambers which keep the pyramid's bulk from crushing the flat roof of the King's Chamber. Many alternative researchers believe that these marks were faked to bolster the traditional identification of Khufu with the Great Pyramid. The first relieving chamber came to light in the 18th century, as Martin Stower says in Forging the Pharoah's Name