A new idea on how the pyramids were constructed, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 11:52 AM by IvanZana
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to
post by IvanZana




You seem to have developed the 'I know everything disease'. So how do you account for the C-14 dates - let me guess you dismiss them with the Ivan intellect?



Are you really that dim? c-14 tests?

One of the most frequent uses of radiocarbon dating is to estimate the age of organic remains from archaeological sites. When plants fix atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) into organic material during photosynthesis they incorporate a quantity of 14C that approximately matches the level of this isotope in the atmosphere (a small difference occurs because of isotope fractionation, but this is corrected after laboratory analysis).
en.wikipedia.org...


Your fuzzy logic would make sense if the pyramids were built from plants and we know they are not HAN.

If I find an ancient burried structure and i droppped my leather wallet or another organic material and then died. 2000 years in the future when they find that old structure and my wallet, is the structure as old as my wallet? c-14 says so.

Research, research han.





[edit on 11-12-2008 by IvanZana]

[edit on 11-12-2008 by IvanZana]



reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 12:00 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by Mozzy



Yes it's fun the first 243 times.



reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 12:16 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by Mozzy



Can you post an image of what you mean Mozzy? If you mean the soot marks they come from the various torches and fires that were lite in post AE days (Afaik)


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 12:34 PM by Mozzy


this is one, just pulled off the top of the list at google. i've seen others that had burns on the sides if i remember right. at work so not much time.



reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 12:37 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by Mozzy



In some of the rooms there is evidence that the wooden panels there were removed - which accounts for no decorations or carvings in those rooms. As to what those might be in the grand galley, I've never seen any definite association of them. It (afaik) not clear when they were made.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 12:45 PM by theindependentjournal
reply to post by IvanZana



I go with the Shem idea personally and it is interesting tat the Great Pyramid is NOT a burial chamber and never had a capstone... This would line up with the Bible saying Jesus was the Cornerstone (capstone) and would explain why it was left off.

On another point I think this could be, (MIND YOU I SAID COULD BE) an example of the Eternal city that Christ will bring down when he splits the Mount of Olives. The description fits two objects and two objects only... Square or Pyramid, see if you agree

The eternal city will be as described in the KJV of the Bible as "as long as it is high as it is wide".

I see this as only a Square or a Pyramid to fit those dimensions and I believe Shem built this for that reason and left the capstone for Christ.

Just my opinion, but I most closely agree with IvanZana and think the posts are worth some thought... Star for you IvanZana!


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 12:55 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by Mozzy



One can drag in other religions at any time. But when dealing with the AE you have to deal with their religion which was the center point of their lives.

No ancient author has noted that the pyramids weren't completed (no top) one can assign X-tian symbolism to AE but you always have to remember that the AE weren't aware of those concepts. The one Roman copy was completed with an apex-as were the Nubian ones.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 12:57 PM by IvanZana
Originally posted by Hanslune
Ah Ivan


The only inscription from the claimed pyramid builders are a series of hand written graphitti above the kings chamber. No hieroglyphs.


You forgot that its a plural, there are inscriptions. No hieroglyphs?? Then how are they written?


I forgot that you were here han, I have to break it down a little bit for you to comprehend.

What I meant by hieroglyphs is the carved permenant variety found around egypt and not the magic marker variety found above the kings chamber. I was going more for •The Egyptian picture language. From the Greek word meaning "sacred carving".




This picture is of the only hieroglyphs found at the great pyramid. Too bad its only on the outside.

As far as the 'hieroglyphs' above the kings chamber was written in ink or something. Like a magic marker.


Within its walls no hieroglyph proclaims the name of the architect and no cartouche celebrates the life of the pharoah for whom it was built. When the caliph Mamum forced his way in over a thousand years ago, he found no record of who had built the massive structure. Not in the Subterranean Chamber, nor the so-called Queen's Chamber or even in the much-vaunted King's Chamber. Not until 1837 did any marking or identifier turn up within the pyramid's walls, and only then deep inside the secret relieving chambers which keep the pyramid's bulk from crushing the flat roof of the King's Chamber. Many alternative researchers believe that these marks were faked to bolster the traditional identification of Khufu with the Great Pyramid. The first relieving chamber came to light in the 18th century, as Martin Stower says in Forging the Pharoah's Name
jcolavito.tripod.com...

The four remaining compartments were discovered by Colonel Howard Vyse, and his assistants, in 1837; ... they had been sealed since the pyramid was built, and were reached only by tunnelling; this was done by hired quarrymen, using gunpowder."

Some scholars and intellects argues that they were forged by Vyse and his assistants in the hope of gaining fame and fortune. He claims that the hieroglyphs are ungrammatical and misspelt (with the sign for 'ra', the supreme god of Egypt, being written instead of 'kh'), that the cursive script in which they were written dates from a later era, and that they were copied (complete with mistakes) from standard contemporary works on hieroglyphics. This argument has been repeated by several other writers, including Graham Hancock (though he has since rejected the forgery theory), Eric von Däniken, and Colin Wilson."
jcolavito.tripod.com...

And to han. I didnt not live in those time and neither did you so of course alot of this discussion is speculation built on evidence that we have at this time. Dont let your hatred for Jesus or a greater power cloud your sense of reason and intellect.

[edit on 11-12-2008 by IvanZana]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 7 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 15 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags