A new idea on how the pyramids were constructed, page 4

reply to post by Hanslune

---

I don't understand what you are saying. I've been on for a couple hours now, on other threads. What is it you're suggesting?

I don't know Ivan, but I do find Egyptologists explanations a bit flaky. I can't speak for Ivan, but I do believe that the pyramids at Giza were built some 10,000 to 12,500 years ago at least.

You'll also note that in north central Africa, during that same period, there was a considerable inland lake that was a thriving area now occupied by the Berbers. Large ships and all. And if there, it would also explain where all the rain came from that generously watered Egypt during those earlier times, which is evidenced by the striations on the Sphinx.

Simultaneously, during that same 10,000-12,500 years ago, something spectacular happened that is evidenced on another continent. During that era, North America lost 150 species with a body weight exceeding 100 pounds in a mass extinction.

I apologize that I didn't read all the posts, but when I read Ivan's, that is when I punched "reply."

If my posting, or my timing doesn't meet your narrowly determined protocol for posting, or if you suspect we put our heads together, I would suggest you take it up with the Forum Moderators, and I think they'll verify my activity over the past hours.

So, if two people disagree with you or another, then there's something suspicious?

Man, you're on the correct website!

reply to post by Byrd

---

Howdy Byrd

Didn't we run across this before? I thought we found that two different parts of Herodotus text had been edited to imply the catacombs and tunnel were under the pyramids while they were in fact talking about a different structure- the one that they think they finally found a few years ago - the one with lots of rooms.

Going from memory here

reply to post by Hanslune

---

That is a pretty smug response. What I read was to the effect that someone objected to your claim and you attempted a strawman refutation.
The person in question (sorry dude, I'm not going back to get your name) didn't say anything about anyone non-egyptian, they just countered your arguments lack of evidence. You then asked them to prove that it was built by non-egyptians.
Non Sequitor.

reply to post by Jay-in-AR

---

Sorry, Jar-in-AR I recommend you go back and read the thread, perhaps you'd care to answer the questions that Ivan fled from?

reply to post by Hanslune

---

I've already read it, buddy. And no, I'm not answering questions that aren't directed to me. I don't speak for Ivan. Nor he for me.
Unless you are going to claim I'm yet another alter-ego.

reply to post by Jay-in-AR

---

Howdy JiA

So what is your view on the subject then?

Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by Jay-in-AR

---

Sorry, Jar-in-AR I recommend you go back and read the thread, perhaps you'd care to answer the questions that Ivan fled from?

I didnt flee from any questions, they were childish, redundant, pointless, argumentative dead ends.

Nice try. Well thats almost everyone that disagrees with your logic, attacks, insults, and responses.


Now back on topic. PLEASE!.

HANSLUNE :If your having a hard time understanding the information put forth by ATS forum members and readers. u2u me and I will try to break it down for you. No need for silly rants and displays of insecurities and ignorance in a public forum such as this one that loves talking about aliens and ufo's. Tsk tsk.

[edit on 11-12-2008 by IvanZana]

[edit on 11-12-2008 by IvanZana]

My understanding is that the pyramids were built by 'thought.' They were built and used for healing. The stones are alive. The original capstone was gold, however, when the Ra complex left, they took the gold with them, replacing it with something else. You can read it here.
www.lawofone.info...
And, yes, I tend to believe this over and above any human theory.

reply to post by Hanslune

---

My view on this particular subject is that the Great Pyramids remain, unto this very day, one of the most startling mysteries on this Planet.
Other than that, I make no claims.

I am interested in the building by nature of my work. I am a land surveyor. Needless to say, I find the entire structure an anomaly.

As far as any questions go, I asked specific questions to the topic of this thread. They went unanswered. As you said yourself, I am more interested in the truth of this subject than anything anyone here says about my person.
This thread appears to be a complete waste of time. The subject of the thread hasn't been discussed AT ALL.

Truth be told, I have seen some pretty compelling evidence that the entire complex could be used to serve as a Polar Circumference Map. I don't remember the particulars, so that is an unevidenced claim unless I'm pressed to try and recreate the evidence (It was relayed to me in a chat room, hold your laughter, many years ago)...
That has led me to entertain a hypothesis of mine, that being that the people who built it were mathematical masters. Incorporating their mathematical knowledge into a building they produced a vast array of mathematical anomalies (equatorial circumference of earth corresponding in ratio to the base length of the structure, same ratio applies to polar circumference and height, etc, etc)...
This hypothesis of mine will remain just that as I can't be bothered to do the necessary research, at least not until I become more financially secure.



[edit on 11-12-2008 by Jay-in-AR]

reply to post by dooper

---

From some of the stuff that I've read, the Ancient Egyptians had a very good grasp on medicine.
There is some speculation that the Egyptians could accurately forcast the gender of the baby a woman was carrying. Along with the brain surgery and the world's first outpatient care facilities.

Before Egyptian civilization emerged, there was a widespread civilization in Sahara, which lasted several thousand years (8.000 - 2.000 BC), parallel to Vincan civilization around Danube, in the northern Balkan, where first alphabet was used, from which most European alphabets were derived including Phoenician alphabet, which was brought to Near East by Pelasti or Pelasgi (Palestine is called after them).

Tassilli in southern Algeria has many paintings from this era, when Sahara was fertile and rich land. It is quite possible that their civilization was at least partly embedded in Egyptian tradition, but pyramids are a very different brand of culture.

First traces of Egyptian literacy as well as Sumerian are at least 2.000 years after Vincan alphabet (they appear around 3.000 BC) and the first proto alphabet in Europe is from Lepenski Vir (6.000 BC), which was later in contact with Vinca and the whole Balkan area. This proto alphabet (6000 - 4000 BC) was derived from geometry, particularly triangle structures. Both Egyptian and Sumerian scriptures are independent from Vincan.

www.korenine.si...


What I am trying to say is that Sahara civilization could have been in contact with European cultural groups from Neolitic times, through Spain or even Asia Minor (less likely). But there is very little evidence that Egyptian culture had even remote direct contacts with European culture, in which we can see triangular schemes in use in architecture (Lepenski Vir) on a small scale.

So, question is what kind of background there is for Egyptians building pyramids? Is it possible that Sahara culture is the source, exploring this remote possibility that knowledge of geometry got to Egypt from Europe?

Here are some interesting links, maybe good for another topic.

Vinca
Vincan alphabet and all other alphabets derived from it, plus more...
www.omniglot.com...

Origin of runic alphabet
leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com...
Vincan culture
en.wikipedia.org...

www.prehistory.it...

This one is not in English, but pictures speak as thousand words. Their knowledge of geometry is obvious.
www.yurope.com...

Funny thing is the pyramids were built to align the orion constellation .. at 10,000 BC..when doing the computer star model for it.. there is no way that the more modern Egyptians had anything to do with building those pyramids.. There is very little evidence inside that supports that theory... What happened early on with the Pharaohs was that they created the tomb inside long after the pyramids were built..


My favorite researcher on the subject is Graham hancock

reply to post by thefreepatriot

---

Yes, Fingerprints of the Gods was a great work, IMO.
What gets me COMPLETELY RILED UP about this whole subject is that now people are, in fact, leaning towards the idea that the Sphinx was, in fact, built much earlier than previously believed.
It was Grahamn Hancock, with the help of Robert Schoch that pointed this out. It was met with ridicule and now is moving towards being accepted (the sphinx that is)... But people fail to realize that he came up with that number, not based solely on the weathering patterns of the Sphinx, but also with the astronomical chambers inside the pyramid. Which would necessitate, at least in my mind, that the pyramid is equally as old, as the research suggests...

Baby steps, I suppose.

Ancient Walled City, Older than Egypt\'s Pyramids, Unearthed off US Georgia Coast
  Posted 12 days ago with 101 member flags

Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 6 days ago with 96 member flags

12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags

The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 14 days ago with 70 member flags

Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags

Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags

42,000-year-old paintings : \'The oldest work of art ever\' discovered
  Posted 3 days ago with 26 member flags

R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 10 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: