Ineresting discussion I had with a Homeland Security agent, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 10:27 AM by samuel.iamenski007
reply to post by TheAgentNineteen



Regarding credentials (badges), I've had TS, TS/SCI and others over the years and as a matter of policy, the badge stays with me at all times, including at home. So in the context of this individuals badge, to say that nothing of a TS nature can leave a TS environment in incorrect.


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 10:35 AM by Supes
reply to post by samuel.iamenski007



Does the ID state the level of clearance on it? I'm curious as I only looked at the name and picture on the ID to verify the card he was using was his, I didn't look at any of the other information on it. That was part of the discussion early in the thread that he wouldn't have shown me an ID that showed his level of clearance, though as I said, I don't think TS is all that uncommon.

[edit on 22-11-2008 by Supes]



reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 11:29 AM by Supes
Originally posted by FlyersFan
To the OP - nice post. But I think you had someone pulling a fast one on you. He was way to chatty to be real and nothing TS would be out in the open like that.


Nothing Top Secret was in the open. Saying you have TS clearance isn't TS in itself, if it is, I know at least a handful of people who have spilled, including samuel.iamenski007 a few posts ago.

Originally posted by heyo
Interesting story. I have to ask myself "is the Op insane?". I have no evidence of this, and also the o.p. doesn't benefit from the post in any way (if he were insane there could be some mental reward for lying). Many are saying he guy "wouldn't show that id" or "wouldn't say he's an agent". I agree, under normal circumstances. However, if you add that he says "the gov't can't protect you", then you have a man who might be breaking protocol because it doesn't function the way it was meant to. If he sees these agencies as lumbering beauracracies then it would seem logical that telling the people themselves of impending disasters would be the next step. All in all, a frighteningly believable story.


Thanks for the vote of confidence on the state of my mental health but to counter the point about him not showing his ID; The guy is just a cop, cops do it all the time. Retired cops, off duty cops, cops on their lunch breaks, we get cops in here a lot as we're a specialty store and fairly well known in the area. Cops usually keep their badges in the same place as their credit cards. I don't get the whole "he wouldn't show his badge" argument.


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 02:59 PM by DocMoreau
Originally posted by Supes

Ever work retail? I not only see that every day, but I do it myself. As for the guy showing his federal I.D. I'm guessing he was looking for a discount.

As far as me being a victim...HUH?? I didn't tell him anything except that I carry a gun. Oh crap I just told ATS!!! This must be some social engineering at work

I didn't even tell him my name, so not sure how you read all that from my recounting.

Here's a thought, he was as paranoid as everyone on this board and he was only saying what everyone else is saying. I just thought it was odd hearing it from someone in his position.


Ummm. Yeah, I have worked retail. In fact I used to work retail in a very high dollar item store, and we required the customers to sign the card. If they refused, we refused the merchandise.

Do you know why? Someone can steal a credit card when it comes in the mail, activate it, write see id on the back, and then social engineer the cashier into accepting it. Then when the card comes up stolen, usually the business is out of their merchandise, and out the sale as well. Insurance covers parts, but usually not all of situations like that. But not if it happens often enough.

Do you often ask for them to take the id out of the wallet when you are checking the signature? Probably not. Most people don't. Most people don't even check to see if the name matches on the credit card and on the id. They just match the signature they now have to the one on the id.

I never said you told him your name, but you did tell him your ethnicity, and that you have a firearm.

DocMoreau


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 03:42 PM by Supes
Originally posted by DocMoreau

Ummm. Yeah, I have worked retail. In fact I used to work retail in a very high dollar item store, and we required the customers to sign the card. If they refused, we refused the merchandise.

Do you know why? Someone can steal a credit card when it comes in the mail, activate it, write see id on the back, and then social engineer the cashier into accepting it. Then when the card comes up stolen, usually the business is out of their merchandise, and out the sale as well. Insurance covers parts, but usually not all of situations like that. But not if it happens often enough.

Do you often ask for them to take the id out of the wallet when you are checking the signature? Probably not. Most people don't. Most people don't even check to see if the name matches on the credit card and on the id. They just match the signature they now have to the one on the id.

I never said you told him your name, but you did tell him your ethnicity, and that you have a firearm.

DocMoreau


I ask for it out of the wallet when I can't read it. I always note the signature, the name and make sure the picture matches the face.

And technically I lied to him concerning my ethnicity. It is a common misconception that Lebanese are Arabs. We're Mediterranean, more closely related to Phoenicians. And to top it all of I wear a cedar charm on my necklace. So once again I didn't give him any personal information that I don't give freely to everyone on a daily basis.


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 09:14 PM by manoffewwords
reply to post by whiteraven



I can't speak much on the National Guard incident. I am aware of the incident, however, I do not know enough details to comment on it. I would hope that the soldiers as well as their superiors were charged and convicted. Were they?

As for your other "Cop rants". Yes I agree these cops unneccesarily took lives, and should be held accountable for that. However, the Taser incident at the Vancouver airport, was not a deliberate attempt to kill someone, only an unfortunate accident. Police are armed with Taser's as a non-lethal option. When the RCMP used it on that man, they did not intend to kill him. And, not that I have any sympathy, the drunk driving situation could be a direct result of the cops involvement in that situation.

With more Taser incidents occuring, it won't be long before you see them banned. There is already much talk about it happening. I speak of Canada here not the States.


I could go on and on but I think my point is made.....


Your examples highlight the bad apples, the psychos that I spoke of. They would kill wether they wore a uniform or not, the uniform just emboldens them with an "above the law" attitude. You do nothing to disprove my post, which talked about the willful mass killings of civilians by the military. So either I don't get your point or you didn't make any, in reference to my statements.

Do you have examples of American/Canadian military or police killing civilians on a large scale? If you do please enlighten me, otherwise your post is just as you say, a "rant" nothing more.

Peace



reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 11:16 PM by Exmar
My 2 cents

I was stationed at Camp Pendelton during the Rodney King Riots. Was on standby to go up there and back up the national guard if things got out of control. Did not go but, we were ready and willing to go. Was 19 at the time and itching for a fight and didn't think (as I should have) about the possibilty of firing on "Fellow Americans", I looked at them as looters, thugs and criminals.

Had a Drill instructor explain to me in great detail the Military command structure. Federal troops ASAF, USA, USN, USMC fall differently in the command structure. Distributed command makes it harder for 1 group to gain control over the entire military during a coup attempt. Worst case scenario, Airforce/Army could end up fighting Marines/Navy. SF troops against regulars, SEALS against Green Beret, Rangers against Recon. National Guard is under command of the Governors of their states. They could end up fighting Federal troops. This almost came to be in Utah long ago when Brigham Young (Yes, the father of Mormons) was Governor and was trying to extort settlers on their way to California.

The most disturbing thing in my mind is the Iraq war. It has, in a way, Federalized the National Guard by deploying them on foreign soil alongside Federal Troops. Governors could have rejected the improper use of their State's troops but, none did. National Guard troops entering New Orleans after Katrina did so with weapons at the ready, they were recently back from deployment in Iraq.

Where does DHS fit in this structure? Who are they loyal too? And even more disturbing, where will Obama's volunteer corps fit into the structure? Equal authority to Federal troops? Superior? Congressional approval required to activate them? Does Obama see something coming and taking extreme action in an effort to protect us or is he apart of it? Patriot Act expanded Secret Service authority, former head of Secret Service now heads the Border Patrol.

Very, Very Disturbing to a simple Marine like me.
I guess the Black SUV's are going to come for me now. Fk it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



I Was Arrested At Occupy Oakland Yesterday
  Posted 13 days ago with 98 member flags
Something funny about ATS...and the whole world for that matter
  Posted 18 days ago with 26 member flags
Black Triangle With Three Lights Just Flew Over Our House!
  Posted 10 days ago with 25 member flags
The Solar Flares Effects on Humans.
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags