Originally posted by l0rds0fcha0s
I don't believe that by civil war it means te country split from north and south or east and west. Here's a senario.
Obama gets assassinated or found to be not eligible, that will cause a "civil war" the people who voted for him will riot and we will have to
protect ourselves..
You are just confusing the battle lines of the first civil war as an idealisim of civil war. The reason the first civil war had those lines were over
the subject of slavery. The North didn't require slavery as it had been moving toward indrustralisim where the south still wanted slavery as it was
more farming and such.
Unless a topic such would devide the nation again no clear cut lines can be drawn. If things were to get as bad as they could then you could see
pockets of rebelious zones pockmarking the landscape and several types of pockets of resistance according to the particular land people's adjenda.
Imagine if you will not 2 clear cut sides but 10 diffrent sides all against their own perception of "evil big brother government" and against
eachother to boot.