Originally posted by Areal51
Who are you? I'm not in the business of convincing you to do anything. Make up your own damn mind.
You just proved my point area51, and you are like every Obamanoid I have ever seen that argues to defend the marxist senator from Illinois only to
fight off allegations made but damn when it comes time to JUSTIFY their OWN damn reasons they are supporting him,, we see the typical temper tantrum
tirade you just displayed saying "I'm not in the business of convincing you. Make up your own damn mind"
This of course is not entirely true, as what you are doing is attempting to keep ME from convincing others, having no alternative to offer as reasons
FOR supporting Obama other than the spell you are under or the infatuation you have with his studly good looks, clever witt and repartee.
Makes for a better understanding as to what motivates you but last I checked,, he is a Married Man.
You write these big wordy posts and back them up with nothing.
Big Words are a problem for you? Perhaps Ill choose words having only two syllables from now on, I certainly don't want t be accused of having a
made you feel inferior with or without your consent. Oh and when you say back "them" up with nothing?? Could you please be more specific, I am at a
loss to understand which post you are talking about where Obama himself didn't prove my point.
Why? Because you just spouting off your knee-jerk opinions, but you want the appearance of depth.
Oh I wouldn't say that,, I mean Obamanoids like yourself have a tendency to resort to the same tactics you are using here because your post is
nothing more then a critique of mine but one based on your opinion as to what "depth" really is. After getting this far in your post I would say
your the type of guy that thinks if beauty is only skin deep then you want beautiful skin damn it!
There's nothing deep about anything that you post.
Like I said, I am talking to Obamanoids like yourself, if I went any deeper you wouldn't know what I was talking about because I'd have to use even
bigger words then those you are already having a problem with now.
And your latest response is typical.
lol umm yeah,, most of mine are typical of how I am, the way I am in spite of how YOU are. Or maybe I should say "what" you are.
You avoid the meat of what I said, which is that you don't know jack about the case,
Well that's assuming I saw any "meat" in your post, I may have glanced over that part by mistake trying to avoid all the ad-homs and insults words
to the effect I am nothing compared to your staggering intellect.
The difference is I don't care to read your combative hostility centerd diatribe much less feel like I need to explain something so academic as my
advice you should try to be more "at cause" than at "effect" and then maybe YOUR posts would be a shining example as an alternative to my typical
ones rather than looking like they come from the mind of a child with a temper.
yet you come on board preaching to everybody as if you are an authority on it.
Oh how can that POSSIBLY BE when YOU ARE! Right?
That is besides being the "authority on worthwhile posts" and how to use more depth without the superfluous "big words"
You want the power that you condemn. You who want to convince. All this talk about politicians working for us... That is the dream right
there! They promise to work for us, but usually end up working for themselves. Politicians are not employed by us. Politicians are employed by
city, state, and federal governments. Does your signature appear on the paychecks of government employees? No! Quit dreaming that it does.
No,, I never said I signed their check nor did I say they are "employed" by us. I said they work for US and they do but now I know why you don't
think I prove anything because the thought of my being right and your NEED to be right being in jeopardy, is so devastatingly distasteful to you, that
you have even gone as far as saying YOU know more then the founding fathers who wrote that FACT into our Constitution, why they are called "OUR" not
the federal state and local governments, but OUR "ELECTED" represenatives. When they don't satisfy our expectations we fire them by not putting
them back in office for another term like what happend to many Republicans back in 2006.
If you actually owned a security company that ran background checks on government employees, you would actually have more influence on employee
behavior than you do now. Why? Because you, along with the pharmaceutical companies, would lobby Congress not to legalize certain drugs. You would
lobby Congress for more stringent drug testing. You'd create scales of reliability and trustworthiness that the personal and professional background
checks of potential employees would have to pass. You'd create ideal psychological profiles that some employees for some agencies would have to
measure up against for some types of jobs. Because of that, you would in fact have people working on your behalf in government. Those that get hired
would be representative of your company. Their performance would reflect on your company. And the politicians would pass more laws and authorize
more contracts on your behalf. That's if your work was actually worth a damn.
Was that the Oxford study or the loyola study?
I like all that stuff ya said about Backround checks to make sure the right people get in the right position and is one of the reasons when
"Certain" people are attempting to get a Job that my tax dollars pay his salary and he isn't going to comply with backround checks birth
certificates things like that,, then I got to ask myself, why hire them.
But the point is that you don't know anything about this case, and you should just admit that to yourself.
I admit it, I don't know that much about the case. (apparently)
Now getting back to what I DO know,, and that is what I DON'T KNOW and I don't know where Barack Obama was originally born. So my NEEDING to know
about this case is simple because it only requires one easy to accomplish, easy to understand, simple action, which would make all that complex stuff
you know so much more about, a lot easier and that would be PRODUCING THE BC LIKE EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING JOHN MCCAIN HAS DONE. So if you know so
much more than I do when all I really need to know can only be proven by asking you one simple question.
Does Barack Obama's Vault Birth Certificate say unequivocally, that he was born in Honolulu or Kenya, or just what DOES it say? Has anyone ever seen
a picture of that part of it that actually saw it for themselves and not heard it from someone else, who heard it from someone else, who heard it from
someone else, that it does? Hell at this point I'd even settle for that, but we have never even got that as an answer because the person who again
said a BC is on record there could NOT answer the question what country was he Born in. So if anyone is spreading lies,, it is you because I HONESTLY
DON'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS BORN! and NEITHER DID THE DOH ELSE THEY WOULD HAVE SAID YES HE WAS BORN IN THIS VERY HOSPITAL!
[edit on 4-11-2008 by MAINTAL]