It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sun's protective 'bubble' is shrinking - NASA will launch mission to study

page: 8
12
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 24 2008 @ 01:23 AM
link   
reply to post by AmmonSeth
 




Your gaseous bodies. Your star. Surely you don't really believe your a living god.


[edit on 24-10-2008 by TH3ON3]



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 12:54 AM
link   
Those planets and that star are part of your gift of life,
therefor they are 'yours'
Study them, You always seem to want to know the meaning of life,
Well the meaning of your life is a lot closer to home than you think,
Understand what made you exist, and you will then understand why,
If you are not capable then do not attempt it,
However as i said, study your larger gaseous planetary bodies,
And you will have a much larger insight into the topic being discussed here



posted on Oct, 26 2008 @ 02:17 AM
link   
If I had the hands to face palm through text... This is one of those things that makes one wish for a return to the 1920s. Recently it was found that not all that long ago we had a much thicker Hydrosphere on Earth. Then it declined (a misguiding understatement I know). Studies suggest that the Hydrosphere is capable of staving off various radiation pollution that comes with sunlight. Specifically in one study, this Hydrosphere staved of UV light. It was found that if one removes the UV light pollution to what it was at the prime of the Hydrosphere plants and animals grow to a much greater size than they do today. This continued to be the case with organics until roughly 100,000 years ago.
Recently, a study suggested that very shortly the changing magnetism of the poles could result in us actually seeing Aurora Borealis in many places around the Earth as multiple 'poles' form, with this increasing for roughly 375 years. Eventually, two new poles should result or some other form of magnetic balance. Similar studies have also found that currently the magnetic shield around the planet is at about 12% of its maximum output as suggested from historical data derived from soil and fossil samples from the last 60 million to 100 million years. Some scientists believe this may be something that is cyclic and there a good deal of evidence to support this. However, it is not certain what this means for our current era nor how long it will be before the shield returns to its maximum.
I find this thread interesting because all of these things are being found in a decline recently. It could be that this is part of a greater solar cycle which we have not enough history to currently make a clear hypothesis on.
It may also be this is unrelated, so much as things are to each other, and that this is really something unique to the sun and again not part of the solar cycles as a whole. By solar cycles I mean, those cycles which involve the solar system as a whole; not just the sun's cycles.
This probably deserves a lot more attention than it is getting. Sadly, most funding that goes to space observation is ridiculously starved. It's another one of those issues we'll probably severely neglect without understanding the impact that such neglect has on everything. Kind of like electricity.



posted on Oct, 26 2008 @ 02:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by AmmonSeth
However, I think you will find that there are some who see everything,
Every possible outcome for every single second that passes,
So it is logical that the definitive outcome is included


Can we please arrange a meeting between myself and that someone you know? I am sure when you ask him or her they will tell you they were expecting me anyhow...



posted on Oct, 27 2008 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy

Originally posted by AmmonSeth
However, I think you will find that there are some who see everything,
Every possible outcome for every single second that passes,
So it is logical that the definitive outcome is included


Can we please arrange a meeting between myself and that someone you know? I am sure when you ask him or her they will tell you they were expecting me anyhow...


there is a difference between knowing all,
and knowing what will happen,
Clairvoyance is not real,



posted on Oct, 27 2008 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Mmm, just read the article, 25% already. Doesn`t give one much hope for the future.
But it may be just a cycle it`s going through - I hope, for the sake of the Earth and all lifeforms.
NASA seem concerned enough to launch IBEX.



posted on Oct, 27 2008 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by AmmonSeth

there is a difference between knowing all,
and knowing what will happen,
Clairvoyance is not real,


Thanks Lord Seth


You should know my loyalties are to Osiris though, so I am not just gonna take your Word as the living truth



[edit on 27-10-2008 by Lucid Lunacy]



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 01:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Old_One
 


Some very interesting observations and ideas. I think you are on to something there. Please provide some links to the things you discussed.



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 09:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Wisdom of one
 


look up Kent Hovind's, The Hovind Theory and check out his theory on the ice age.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 02:12 AM
link   
reply to post by TH3ON3
 


The status of the Heliosphere can only be plotted on a very short and very refined scale. due to the nature of the boundary it must exhibit some fluctuations as the Sun drives toward Alpha Centauri and the Solar Wind meets the Galactic Garbage.

The gravity from the system as a whole would effect the shape of the heliosphere, thus lending an astroillogical aspect to the equations.

Isn't it a little telling that God was so allusory in his descriptions of the end games, almost like they could apply to any number of situations across time and still be held as the immediate goings on by the true believers?




posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 10:32 AM
link   
Seems those Mayan's might be brighter then most scientist ... meaning
this sudden decrease in sheilding might signal a new galactic cleansing cycle.

If those NASA specialist in solar research where to apply mendelbrot studies
they just might figure out whats actually happening.

From my angle I'd say its a cyclic event



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 03:57 AM
link   
reply to post by TH3ON3
 


Oi all i cn say is, watch a movie called Zeitgeist, its a 2 part movie, it will open your eyes



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 05:15 AM
link   


I knew this would happen because it states this as a fact in the writings of the Bible. It states the sun will scorch men in the end days!


just out of curiosity, which scripture says that?



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:53 AM
link   
25% seems a bit much, especially in the last 50 years. With such a high percentage it should be noticable to us on earth. Yet it is not??? Maybe this explains the warming of our solar system.

And leave the bible out of this, fictional books have nothing to do with science and what is happening to our sun.

[edit on 1-11-2008 by Starwatcher]



posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 08:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Skydancer
Seems those Mayan's might be brighter then most scientist ... meaning
this sudden decrease in sheilding might signal a new galactic cleansing cycle.

If those NASA specialist in solar research where to apply mendelbrot studies
they just might figure out whats actually happening.

From my angle I'd say its a cyclic event



I think you would find that nasa scientists are alot into various spiritual stuff too. So you never know they may behind the scenes look at those things. Just will not admit to it, in public.



posted on Dec, 19 2008 @ 03:31 AM
link   
reply to post by TH3ON3
 


The kind of radiation in question isn't the sort that scorches, but irradiates, the way apples are irradiated without getting scorched. Except, it would be a very big apple.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join