|
reply posted on 24-10-2008 @ 01:23 AM by TH3ON3
|
reply to post by AmmonSeth
 Your gaseous bodies. Your star. Surely you don't really believe your a living god.
[edit on 24-10-2008 by TH3ON3]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 12:54 AM by AmmonSeth
|
Those planets and that star are part of your gift of life,
therefor they are 'yours'
Study them, You always seem to want to know the meaning of life,
Well the meaning of your life is a lot closer to home than you think,
Understand what made you exist, and you will then understand why,
If you are not capable then do not attempt it,
However as i said, study your larger gaseous planetary bodies,
And you will have a much larger insight into the topic being discussed here
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-10-2008 @ 02:17 AM by Old_One
|
If I had the hands to face palm through text... This is one of those things that makes one wish for a return to the 1920s. Recently it was found that
not all that long ago we had a much thicker Hydrosphere on Earth. Then it declined (a misguiding understatement I know). Studies suggest that the
Hydrosphere is capable of staving off various radiation pollution that comes with sunlight. Specifically in one study, this Hydrosphere staved of UV
light. It was found that if one removes the UV light pollution to what it was at the prime of the Hydrosphere plants and animals grow to a much
greater size than they do today. This continued to be the case with organics until roughly 100,000 years ago.
Recently, a study suggested that very shortly the changing magnetism of the poles could result in us actually seeing Aurora Borealis in many places
around the Earth as multiple 'poles' form, with this increasing for roughly 375 years. Eventually, two new poles should result or some other form of
magnetic balance. Similar studies have also found that currently the magnetic shield around the planet is at about 12% of its maximum output as
suggested from historical data derived from soil and fossil samples from the last 60 million to 100 million years. Some scientists believe this may be
something that is cyclic and there a good deal of evidence to support this. However, it is not certain what this means for our current era nor how
long it will be before the shield returns to its maximum.
I find this thread interesting because all of these things are being found in a decline recently. It could be that this is part of a greater solar
cycle which we have not enough history to currently make a clear hypothesis on.
It may also be this is unrelated, so much as things are to each other, and that this is really something unique to the sun and again not part of the
solar cycles as a whole. By solar cycles I mean, those cycles which involve the solar system as a whole; not just the sun's cycles.
This probably deserves a lot more attention than it is getting. Sadly, most funding that goes to space observation is ridiculously starved. It's
another one of those issues we'll probably severely neglect without understanding the impact that such neglect has on everything. Kind of like
electricity.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-10-2008 @ 02:25 AM by Lucid Lunacy
|
Originally posted by AmmonSeth
However, I think you will find that there are some who see everything,
Every possible outcome for every single second that passes,
So it is logical that the definitive outcome is included
Can we please arrange a meeting between myself and that someone you know? I am sure when you ask him or her they will tell you they were
expecting me anyhow...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 03:49 PM by AmmonSeth
|
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by AmmonSeth
However, I think you will find that there are some who see everything,
Every possible outcome for every single second that passes,
So it is logical that the definitive outcome is included
Can we please arrange a meeting between myself and that someone you know? I am sure when you ask him or her they will tell you they were
expecting me anyhow...
there is a difference between knowing all,
and knowing what will happen,
Clairvoyance is not real,
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 05:09 PM by Waitingsolong
|
Mmm, just read the article, 25% already. Doesn`t give one much hope for the future.
But it may be just a cycle it`s going through - I hope, for the sake of the Earth and all lifeforms.
NASA seem concerned enough to launch IBEX.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 05:23 PM by Lucid Lunacy
|
Originally posted by AmmonSeth
there is a difference between knowing all,
and knowing what will happen,
Clairvoyance is not real,
Thanks Lord Seth
You should know my loyalties are to Osiris though, so I am not just gonna take your Word as the living truth
[edit on 27-10-2008 by Lucid Lunacy]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-10-2008 @ 01:26 AM by pavil
|
reply to post by Old_One
Some very interesting observations and ideas. I think you are on to something there. Please provide some links to the things you discussed.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-10-2008 @ 09:25 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
reply to post by Wisdom of one
look up Kent Hovind's, The Hovind Theory and check out his theory on the ice age.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 02:12 AM by Webmusher
|
reply to post by TH3ON3
The status of the Heliosphere can only be plotted on a very short and very refined scale. due to the nature of the boundary it must exhibit some
fluctuations as the Sun drives toward Alpha Centauri and the Solar Wind meets the Galactic Garbage.
The gravity from the system as a whole would effect the shape of the heliosphere, thus lending an astroillogical aspect to the equations.
Isn't it a little telling that God was so allusory in his descriptions of the end games, almost like they could apply to any number of situations
across time and still be held as the immediate goings on by the true believers?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 10:32 AM by Skydancer
|
Seems those Mayan's might be brighter then most scientist ... meaning
this sudden decrease in sheilding might signal a new galactic cleansing cycle.
If those NASA specialist in solar research where to apply mendelbrot studies
they just might figure out whats actually happening.
From my angle I'd say its a cyclic event
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 05:15 AM by miriam0566
|
I knew this would happen because it states this as a fact in the writings of the Bible. It states the sun will scorch men in the end days!
just out of curiosity, which scripture says that?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 08:53 AM by Starwatcher
|
25% seems a bit much, especially in the last 50 years. With such a high percentage it should be noticable to us on earth. Yet it is not??? Maybe
this explains the warming of our solar system.
And leave the bible out of this, fictional books have nothing to do with science and what is happening to our sun.
[edit on 1-11-2008 by Starwatcher]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 08:57 AM by andy1033
|
Originally posted by Skydancer
Seems those Mayan's might be brighter then most scientist ... meaning
this sudden decrease in sheilding might signal a new galactic cleansing cycle.
If those NASA specialist in solar research where to apply mendelbrot studies
they just might figure out whats actually happening.
From my angle I'd say its a cyclic event
I think you would find that nasa scientists are alot into various spiritual stuff too. So you never know they may behind the scenes look at those
things. Just will not admit to it, in public.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |