Palin Appears To Be Wearing an Earpiece During The Debate, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 60 times


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:18 PM by SkepticOverlord
After some internal discussion among staff, we found this photo from a reasonably recent news conference covering the Exon Valldez...



From that, I made this comparison...

It appears that the "lumps and bumps" of her natural ear, combined with the intense studio lighting, is creating the appearance of an earpiece.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:20 PM by nyk537
reply to post by SkepticOverlord



Just as I suspected.

Excellent work SO!

That's why they pay you the big bucks.



reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:21 PM by RealityisanIllusion
reply to post by Enigma Publius



I don't recall saying she was my candidate. I just tried to explain what the device was. I applauded her for wanting to hear the questions better. How horrible of me to do such a thing. I should be horsewhipped.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:25 PM by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
After some internal discussion among staff, we found this photo from a reasonably recent news conference covering the Exon Valldez...



From that, I made this comparison...

It appears that the "lumps and bumps" of her natural ear, combined with the intense studio lighting, is creating the appearance of an earpiece.


Love it, now does this go into the been totally debunked category?


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:31 PM by Stormdancer777



reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:32 PM by RFBurns
reply to post by Stormdancer777



That is the new proposed "fly on the wall".

Cheers!!!


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:33 PM by DrumJunkie
reply to post by mind is the universe



Well..speaking as a "hillbilly" though I don't "swing" to a side either. does that make you as dumb as my hillbilly self or and I a genius like you

you really should think before you speak. Everyone on hillbilly land are not like the Clampets sitting around the SEE-Mint-Pond

You have done nothing but offend anyone that might disagree with you as well as people that happen to live an an area that you apparently know nothing about.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:56 PM by Illusionsaregrander


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:59 PM by mmariebored
Originally posted by DocMoreau
The evidence I found my belief on is the photographic evidence presented here in this thread...

You should look at the video yourself, say, take it into
Photoshop and examine it meticulously. It's not a good idea to "believe" based on what you see in a thread. It may have been rigged.

but also the way in which Sarah Palin's responses sounded scripted

That would be a better reason to "believe" she was wearing an earpiece, but you're basing your opinions on how YOU think a person should behave when under the spotlight. Everyone behaves differently at different times, it's what makes us unique human beings. No need to be rude or judge a person for moving a certain way. That doesn't mean she has something in her ear. Maybe she had an itch. You don't know.

And EVERY politician is "scripted"...please.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 02:13 PM by slywhite
reply to post by centurion1211



Just back from lunch and you're still trying to school me about something you just became aware of according to your own posts. Still doesn't detract from the fact that you didn't know what a Rhodes Scholar is. So I mispelled it. I'm so confident I don't use spell check.
Back to the point, your candidates tried to parallel themselves with a Rhodes Scholar when each of them clearly had trouble finishing college.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 02:19 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by nyk537



Ridiculous. Nobody had the questions ahead of time. If it indeed is something it could be as simplistic as an ear monitor to ensure that the candidates could hear each other.



reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 02:25 PM by CapsFan8
reply to post by Illusionsaregrander



This is probably more indicative of what was going on if anything. Pundits and anchors have earpieces and we never notice except when they grab their ear and say "breaking news" when they are fed something, so why can't she have had an intentionally hard to see, very small earpiece that had her on track sticking to talking points and avoiding real questions?

On the other hand the candidates saw the questions first so they probably decided how to handle them beforehand. She's getting better with those talking points but it still shows she doesn't really know herself what to do. She couldn't answer anything not pre-scripted like the interview with the press and the difference seen here sticks out like a sore thumb. Some of the things she defended didn't seem like she would say that out of her own belief. Form your own opinion lady.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 02:27 PM by Alxandro
reply to post by SkepticOverlord



SO,
shouldn't this thread be closed now since it seems to be based on "Rumor and Innuendo"?


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 02:36 PM by slywhite
reply to post by RFBurns



I'm the one who started this particular thread because I was actually looking for ear pieces. Biden doesn't have glasses or hair to obstruct the visibility of one. He didn't have one. Additionally, the left arm of Palins' glasses doesn't have the white design(lines) like the right side. The pictures that the site moderaters put up make a more compelling case for the ear peice when you know what you're looking for.
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 9 days ago with 59 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 7 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 8 days ago with 10 member flags
White House pressure on Gulf oil leak figures
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags