Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
I think your idea is noble, but honestly, as a "new age" Christian, I doubt that it would work. These two religions have been at odds for so long
that I don't see any end to the conflict. I mean, it's like asking Hindus and Muslims to get along. It's not going to happen.
[edit on 28-9-2008 by SpeakerofTruth]
But that in itself DOES happen. India amongst many other places.
Huge muslim, sikh, christian , Buddist population (along with many others...)
So why can't the Western world deal with it?
--
Originally posted by dizziedame
I am a Christian. My religion teaches love for others. Where there is love there can be no hate.
Fair play... I appreciate that, but there are a lot of pseudo-christians out there (as with pseudo-Muslims) who take their religion and 'bend it to
their own will and translation.
--
Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge
The conflict is not a religious now - it is geopolitical and cultural before it is religious. Religion of course plays its part in the background but
it is not the main driving factor. There are areas were Christians and Muslims lived in relative peace. Then on the wake of some political instability
the real fightings started. And if you will say that removing religion will remove this "background" constant potential aggression - then i want to
remind you that racial , status and ton of other differences played the same background role. Religion is not the main problem. People who use it to
ignite sleeping fire are.
That is all true, and of varying degrees of importance depending on which corner of the globe we are standing on, yet you speak in past terms where
you speak of muslim/christian social peace. It exists still, in many parts of the world.
You speak of geopolitics, as of course in certain areas, religion plays a huge role in the political structure. The question is, is the Western world
going to readily accept it? I believe that is exactly where the divide is caused. I think most westerners, like to believe that religion should be
kept out of politics for many reasons, this generally works as a whole.
But then, the conflict is caused when cultures try to merge that have religious and politicial ideals that are one and the same. Is this our tolerance
that is the problem, or do we see the potential for bias involved in those courts?
A hot potatoe of a subject.
Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge
And as for your suggestion to "merge" religions - then guess what, somebody tried this solution and the result is that all the "original"
religions hate the result of the merger and consider it a heresy.
No easy solutions. Just everyone needs to take responsibility on his actions and understand that he/she will answer eventually for the blood on his
hands - his own,that of infidels or just of bystanders.
Okay... Who exactly will we be answering to? God? Angels? St Peter? Allah? Our Government? Someone elses Government? Who?
As i told you already, I'm an atheist.... Why?
Because I think we should answer our problems NOW... and not be cowardly enough to wait until the 'afterlife'.
This is our life. So why wait until we are dead to change things?
I'd rather bring my children up in a world where people can effectively be nice to each other, as a result of a handful of people taking the right
actions....
...as opposed to a ruined, burned out, hate-filled war zone that resulted from the blind leading the blind.
We have problems, but they can be sorted. Nothing is impossible.
Thanks so far to everyone for contributing to this thread.