It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by northof8
- He had every reason to do it. He is very afraid of Palin.
- There is no proof that he didn't do it on purpose.
- He was talking about her when made the statement. You can tell by the crowds reaction and his pause that it was intentional and he did mean to call her a pig.
- The media is in the bag for Obama and has been from day one. Just ask Hillary or watch PMSNBC
Originally posted by Sublime620
Just like what he said right afterwards, that a fish wrapped in paper that says changes will still stink after 8 years. The difference between the fish statement and the pig statement?
You can't take the fish statement out of context. But believe me, if she had fish lips you'd be all over it.
Originally posted by jamie83
Actually you are misquoting what he said. He specifically said "old fish."
The pig and lipstick referred to Palin. The "old fish" referred to McCain.
Originally posted by jamie83
Don't you understand how this whole email database he's built up works?
He can't just ask for money everyday. He needs a new reason every time they send out an email. Last week it was that Palin attacked Obama supporters because she dissed Obama's community organizer background. So send money to Obama.
This week it will be the false claims that Obama is sexist. So send money to Obama.
They need to create something everyday to justify sending out new emails asking for people to cough up cash.
Originally posted by Sublime620
reply to post by northof8
Hmm, proof that he didn't intentionally do it. Sure.
- He has no reason to do it.
- There is no proof that he did do it on purpose.
- He wasn't even talking about her when he made the statement.
- The media has a previous record of taking things out of context and blowing them out of proportion (and worse... people believing it).
reply to post by SectionEight
What worked against Hillary? Can you cite an example?
[edit on 10-9-2008 by Sublime620]
Originally posted by Sublime620
All this, just to stir things up and make some money... as you put it. The deeper you dig, the more absurd it gets.
Originally posted by jamie83
Originally posted by Sublime620
reply to post by northof8
Hmm, proof that he didn't intentionally do it. Sure.
- He has no reason to do it.
- There is no proof that he did do it on purpose.
- He wasn't even talking about her when he made the statement.
- The media has a previous record of taking things out of context and blowing them out of proportion (and worse... people believing it).
Yet knowing all this he said it anyway. And in spite of his protests that there are important issues to discuss, he drew more attention to this issue today by discussing it some more.
I think this is evidence he planned this whole episode.
Originally posted by Sublime620
reply to post by SectionEight
Did you just complain that he used the word "periodically".
Screw it. This man can't win.
I give up.
I hope he never has to reference the Periodic Table of Elements or people might start suing him.
Originally posted by Kesosip
for the sake of argument if that old saying was you can put Lipstick on a coon but its still a coon how would all the oboma suporters be taking it?