posted on Sep, 10 2008 @ 02:25 PM
reply to post by pavil
Again, if he wanted to prove something, why would he use it out of context? He wasn't even talking about Palin. He was mentioning McCain and his
If he really wanted to take a jab at Palin, he could have referenced her, and then slid that comment in. After all, if you are correct that he was
referencing Palin, he obviously didn't care that people were going to notice. So why go out of his way to hide it in a rant about McCain?
connection is between the two is the word "lipstick". He was clearly referencing McCain's policies - he even continued by talking
about stinky fish.
Is there something about stinky fish and Palin that I need to know about?
Though I do admit it damages him. You are correct about that. Whether referenced to her or not, he's on the defensive again over something stupid.
After this dies out, maybe everyone can bring up his lack of a lapel again... because that would be realllllll interesting.
[edit on 10-9-2008 by Sublime620]