^^

But looks kinda cgi.

from nasa website

If the Mars version of our Great Pyramid is indeed a structure, it would make sense as to why it is decaying and eroding, with elements and rock eating and covering it due to the fact that nobody is taking care of it anymore. I dunno, I know a lot of people will say "rock-formations" but regardless, you have to admit there are some EXTREMELY strange coincidences occurring here, especially in regards to the region (as the OP pointed out they're essentially the same location). The thing that gets me is that the whole Face thing has been debunked, and de-debunked so many times that it's almost like "Who cares." The pyramid structures though have always fascinated me.

Adding to this, haven't there been similar structures found on the moon as well? I might have hallucinated that though, I'll try and dig up some info on it. If not, 2 out of 3 ain't bad. Why don't we just send the rover there? Oh yeah...NASA

Originally posted by Phage
How about this one, higher res and different lighting:

EXCELLENT!!!! You found another face on Mars KEWL Great job

Looks like Jabba the Hut



And THIS picture is the Lion that Masqua found.... its not NASA but ESA Mars Express Complete with Whiskers

I have to admit after surviving millions of years of mars dust storms the cydonia pyramids are not so triangular as they used to be,
But they do resemble a pyramid.

The top 'pyramid' doesn't look like one at all. And while the Earth pyramids actually do mimic Orions Belt, the Mars ones do not. The top pyramid is actually lower, NOT higher, than the other two.

It's three peaks of mountians/hills, nothing more.

I could probably take a bunch of photographs of the Rocky Mountains, and find dozens of 'matches' with the Orions Belt. It means nothing.

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
I have to admit after surviving millions of years of mars dust storms the cydonia pyramids are not so triangular as they used to be,
But they do resemble a pyramid.

Here is a pyramid pair in China after much erosion

Come on, now. Aren't you playing a little fast and loose with the exactness of the measurements? Draw some thinner, more accurate lines and suddenly the alignments are off quite a bit, throwing the whole "advanced" engineering notion right out the window.

And what about the differences in the sizes of the pyramids? Also, you can fudge a little bit and claim erosion, but then you really should justify exactly why you chose a particular point or angle over another equally plausible one.

Try it again with a newer image, without the fat crayons and show me what you come up with. Here's a little help. Uh-oh, what happened to the "alignments?"



[edit on 8-9-2008 by Nohup]

Oh, and here's another little thing. The ancient Egyptians deserve a lot of credit for organizing themselves enough to build the Pyramids, but let's not give them any more credit than they are due. As for them being incredibly accurate with their representation of Orion, this composite photo shows that they were either less accurate than you might think, the aliens were less help than previously thought, or maybe the whole arrangement is just a vague, lucky coincidence:

Originally posted by Nohup
As for them being incredibly accurate with their representation of Orion, this composite photo shows that they were either less accurate than you might think, the aliens were less help than previously thought, or maybe the whole arrangement is just a vague, lucky coincidence:

Thanks for sharing, but have you also checked to see what the relationship of the stars was to each other at the time that the pyramids were built?

I think it would be only fair, considering you are basing your judgment on how the stars look today