Mars pyramids identical to earth pyramids!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 12:25 AM by Phage
reply to post by zorgon



You're kidding, right?

Also upside down and not even close.




reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 12:32 AM by daddyroo45
reply to post by xbranscombex



That picture looks amazingly like a bombed out area.Notice how the surrounding landscape is blackened and the inside has the look of impact debris



reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 04:09 AM by kirky
Fascinating as always this subject. I used to be on the “its all lights and shadow” until I read Dark Mission by Richard Hoagland. Now that really does open your eyes up.

Theres enough stuff on the red planet to keep us talking and typing for a millennia. Anyone ever saw this site

www.marsanomalyresearch.com...

Got loads of stuff which is mind boggling also Hoaglands site

enterprisemission.com...

Its a great read too. Sorry if its been mentioned elsewhere...Tons of info on those sites for the inquisitive. There’s a lot of stuff up their guys, which is common knowledge for those that have studied and/or are in the know.

Seems like an ancient civilisation was pottering around up there long time ago. I’m not going to even talk about the moon. Data’s head anyone lol.

Fascinating kudos to the author

Peace
Kirky


[edit on 9-9-2008 by kirky]


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 01:39 PM by Phage
Originally posted by Triton1128

As for those who are super imposing images on top of each other and saying they don't line up. What height ratio are you using?

Do you know the relative size of the terrain in relation to the height the photo was taken? Or are you nabbing the first pic you find on the net and just topping it on the other??

Very sloppy attempts on both sides to prove which is which. Both sides need to take a step back and put a bit more effort into this one


I'm not trying to prove anything. Just showing that Giza and the Hills of Cydonia do not show the same layout. As I said, I did resize the Giza photo in order to try to match at least two of the pyramids with two of the hills. The relative positions of the pyramids did not change with resizing. Since I was working with relative positions, neither the absolute size of the area nor the elevation of the viewpoint matter. The purpose was to show that the relative positions of the hills does not match the relative positions of the pyramids.

Hoagland et al selectively use "precise" alignments when convenient and ignore the mismatches. If the pyramids and the hills of Cydonia are based on the same layout, where are Hoagland's calculations that show it? Instead, we get an aerial view of the pyramids (inverted) laid next to an aerial view of Cydonia, a vague implication that the layout is the same. All I did was put one on top of the other to show that they are not the same, or even close.


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 02:02 PM by Nohup
Originally posted by SuperSlovak
fast and loose? not really... my allignments were made by a mathematical professor studying the cydonia region for years
yours could have been made by a 2 year old


Here's what I mean. Why did this math professor select the points he did? The ones I have pointed out in green? Why, for instance, did he select a seemingly random point roughly but arguably not exactly in the middle of the cluster of "pyramids" in the upper left corner of the image? There's no feature there.



And he did it with a lot of things. The lower right hand corner of the "face" feature, for instance. Why select that point and not something more obvious, like the eyes? And we know now (see other photos above) that the "D&M Pyramid" doesn't have one sharp point on the top, but rather a worn line that doesn't result in a regular pyramid at all. The line on the D&M Pyramid that points to the Face is really off. If you use an accurate line coming from where the real ridge is (see my previous image), it doesn't intersect the Face at all!

Well, the guy selected those points because they fit in with his theory. If you line up (or try to line up) the actual features, they don't have any good alignments. So he had to fudge the measurements with thick lines and strangely selected points. And you can say that he's allowing for erosion, he still has to justify his determination of where he thinks the lines or features originally were. Which he never does.

I don't personally care if he's a mathematician or not. That's just sloppy geometry.

[edit on 9-9-2008 by Nohup]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 113 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 11 hours ago, 96 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 10 hours ago, 63 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 6 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 14 hours ago, 50 replies