Obama will actually vote to "help" Hawaii split from the US. , page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 12:29 PM by Dronetek
Originally posted by bknapple32
Because the bill is not intended to help Hawaii split from the US. You take a mess up of words from Akaka, who has since explained himself, and keep using it against him. Thats not really fair is it? Have you ever messed up what you were trying to explain? Im sure you have, we all have.


Gee, I wonder why? Why in the world would he say it if it wasn't true? The fact is he said it, than got back lash for it and now is trying to say he didn't mean it.

Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
reply to
post by Dronetek



The media hasn't touched this in relation to Obama because it is a non-issue. This is a matter of what is right. If anything, media attention on this story would shine light on Obama in a positive way.


So as always, its only an issue when its a Republican? Why in the world did the media (CNN, ABC & MSNBC) spend 2 days accusing Palin of wanting Alaska to split from the US?

This is the problem at the core of media bias. The media and lots of democrats, have one standard for Republicans and another for themselves.

[edit on 6-9-2008 by Dronetek]


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 12:32 PM by bknapple32
reply to post by Dronetek



One can't slip up and speak faster than a thought in their head? For all you know he was assuming people were thinking that while he was talking.

I for one think Sean Hannity would have attacked this if there was something to attack.

With this line of thinking , I could pinpoint Bush planning 9/11 on his speaking screw ups. But it doesnt mean Im right.



reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 12:54 PM by Dronetek
reply to post by bknapple32



Making a statement of "this is the first step in succession from the US" is not a slip of the tongue or misstatement., There is no way you could rearrange that statement to mean something else.

He knew what he was saying and meant it.

[edit on 6-9-2008 by Dronetek]


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 01:17 PM by bknapple32
reply to post by bknapple32



I guess this is what happens when proper research is not done before trying to attack the other side.


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 01:24 PM by bknapple32
reply to post by seagull



Ok but the thread title should be changed to either Obama and McCain or the split should be taken out. Otherwise its spreads wrong information.


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 01:31 PM by pexx421
Section eight, you made a comment to the effect that never did a welfare check from the government help anyone out of poverty, it just kept them there. I would beg to differ....our government gives massive "welfare" checks to the oil industry, to the agricultural industry, and to the pharma industry, and they make massive profits off of it. Now, apparently, the government is giving massive "welfare" checks to failed bankers who are so bad at their jobs that they are destroying the american economy....and those bankers will then go on to use those checks to buy million dollar mansions and cars and yachts, and further their fortunes as well. And soon our government will be giving out "welfare" checks to the collapsing airlines and automakers industries, and these people will use those checks to live the life that you and i could only dream of. Further the amounts our governments give to these big business has now outstripped the amount of money actually going to the poor. Regardless, even if we WERE giving hawaii back to the hawaiians, this would not be our government handing out free checks to poor people, it would be GIVING BACK THAT WHICH ALREADY BELONGED TO THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. I think the hawaiians were doin just fine before we invaded, in fact, from what i have read, their existence back then was much closer to paradise than most other peoples on this earth, so how do we give them THAT back? We have stolen from them their national innocence, much as a child raped is forever damaged and loses something special, just as we did to the native americans, and in truth, no reparation, no amount of money can ever repay what we took from them, so the least we could do for them is everything.


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 02:09 PM by Dronetek
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to
post by bknapple32


DONE.
OVER.
FIN.

The End

I guess this is what happens when proper research is not done before trying to attack the other side.


Not so fast...

He voted for the cloture vote, or as a courtesy because they knew it was dead.

www.hawaiireporter.com...
But Republicans played let’s make a deal with theirs, negotiating up until the very last minute. Organized in caucus beforehand, some Republicans who knew they would kill the cloture vote, cast their ballot in favor of the Akaka Bill because they either served on the Senate Appropriations Committee with Inouye, the co-chair, and wanted to show him the courtesy, or because they’d traded their vote with Inouye in previous sessions. Republican Sen. Jon Kyl, one of the biggest opponents of the bill, promised the Hawaii delegation he would not stand in the way of the cloture vote because of a previous deal he made, but he told them if it passed cloture, he’d be their toughest opponent.


[edit on 6-9-2008 by Dronetek]


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 02:17 PM by Annie Mossity
Originally posted by Dronetek

Not so fast...

He voted for the cloture vote, or as a courtesy because they knew it was dead.

www.hawaiireporter.com...
...
Republicans who knew they would kill the cloture vote, cast their ballot in favor of the Akaka Bill because they either served on the Senate Appropriations Committee with Inouye, the co-chair, and wanted to show him the courtesy, or because they’d traded their vote with Inouye in previous sessions.
...



Wait.. someone's opinion and mere speculation being paraded as fact?

... typical, all around.

Blogs, Opinions, Speculations... seems everyone has one and, for the most part, none have the essence of roses.

 


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 04:35 PM by hawaiigurl
reply to post by Dronetek



The Akaka Bill is not there to split Hawaii from the US, it's there for Hawaii to become a nation within a nation. It's there for the people of Hawaii to choose wether they want to be a part of it or not. It won't be a law it will be a choice. There are many Hawaiian advocate groups that want this to be done and if it passes then they can be a part of it, if not they don't have to. Why is there a pushing for an Akaka Bill, because some of the people of Hawaii are pushing for it and want it. The missionaries came to Hawaii, held Liliuokalani hostage in her own home and took over our Hawaiian kingdom. I do understand that without the movement of the missionaries we probably woulnd't have very much roads, homes and businesses. Queen Liliuokalani and King Kamehameha gave out acres and acres of land to the people of Hawaii, and now we have to purchase our land or go through the Hawaiian Homes organization to get land, I think thats crap. But yes, some Hawaiian were stupid enough to sell land or trade it for goods, but for most of the land, it was taken away from us, unlawfully. All in all the Akaka Bill is to help the Hawaiian people that want to be a part of it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Senator Paul is being detained at the Nashville Airport by the TSA
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 19 days ago with 88 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 10 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 4 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 6 days ago with 60 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 14 hours ago, 109 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 79 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 50 replies