reply to post by counterterrorist
the system works. I like the gun lovers. Look at the Swiss. If our way was like theirs, how likely would the gov be willing to lie to 300 million well
armed citizens.
[edit on 29-8-2008 by Gorman91]
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by BloodRedSky
I think the army would be on your side that day. Most soldiers come from places of high gun ownage. Why would they fight for a governemnt that steals for what they stand for?
As former Clinton spokesman George Stephanopoulos said, "Let me make one small vote for the NRA. They're good citizens. They call their Congressmen. They write. They vote. They contribute. And they get what they want over time."
www.nra.org...

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by BloodRedSky
I think no matter how much stress you go through, you simply can't crush a patriot.
Also, who's saying they'll GIVE back they're M16![]()
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by badmedia
I don't recall him claiming 4 more years. That's a bit odd.
And he didn't say war on Iran. he said toughness against them. Now that could mean anything yea, but not necessarily war.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by badmedia
But the thing is that within a few years we'll be able to afford them.
But yes, they should be more strikily enforced to only help those who seriously need it.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Loki
Sure, give aks to the store owners. That way, out of fear, you don't steal. Fear is very useful.
I prefer the Switz method: Train ALL your civilians in the art of war and give them ALL gun operation knowledge.
An armed and trained populace, is a protected and self serving populace.