Excellent, now I can add "car" to the list of 'really silly things people see when they look at rocks' list.
Whoever said I must work for NASA.. yea, that's it.. obviously, if I don't see cars and statues and gorillas that apparently eat rocks since there
is no other food, I'm a stooge from NASA sent here to mess with your heads.
And then you ironically point to the "face" on Mars as proof as to why I am wrong, and why that is a structure, not a rock. Not a smart move. Here
is your "face" on Mars once photographed clearly. Convenient how you only posted old pics:
cr4.globalspec.com...
frankwarner.typepad.com...
Now, does that look like a face any longer? Hmmm.... could it just have been shadows and over-reactive imaginations all along? And yet just like
current pictures, people were adamant that that HAD to be a face, no WAY it could be a natural effect. Yet.. ta-dah.. it was nothing. A hill, as
many said it was.
So forgive me if I think a porous rock is just that, based on OTHER rocks DIRECTLY NEARBY that have the exact same type of surface, and the likelyhood
that it is much more likely to be a simple rock, than a small structure all by its lonesome in the middle of nowhere.
You know what.. they may find structures someday. That would be amazing if they did. But if they did, I think it would be a cluster of structures,
you'd realize it was once a populated area. Not statues, homes, and whatever else you are seeing, all by themselves in the middle of a dune.
Whatever you saw, you'd KNOW it was something amazing. And you know what? You'd never see it to begin with. NASA isn't this stupid.
You can't have it both ways. NASA is trying to cover up all signs of UFOs.. BUUUTT.. they purposely let photos of amazing things slip through? And
the government is also apparently, too stupid to notice.
[edit on 27-8-2008 by fleabit]
Wonder if it could be a fake. [Excuse my skepticism, but somebody's gotta do it. ] 
