reply to post by bloodcircle
It could very be that, with the pool cue paradox, if there is ever any movement that would ever cause the wormhole-exiting pool cue to prevent itself
from entering, that they would both simply disappear.
In other words, perhaps they both simply disappear if the ball would ever prevent itself from entering the wormhole in the future.. (Not necessarily
whether or not it does so in the present while hitting the ball and, thus, preventing the time-traveling ball from ever existing.) In other words the
simple probability that the ball will, in the future, hit itself and prevent it from entering altogether creates a whole other timeline in which the
ball CAN'T exist.. Except still on the pool table as if it never even left.
PERHAPS it would even be impossible to hit the pool cue into the wormhole at all. Because if the ball inevitably disappears by entering the wormhole,
exiting, and knocking itself off-coarse as it was entering the wormhole, then that simple inevitability will prevent the time-space continuum from
being able to organise that information and know what to do with it..
Thereby it would prevent you from hitting the ball at all.. Or perhaps it WOULD let you hit the ball towards the wormhole, but at the exact point
your pool stick hits the cue, the cue then disappears. It is not only the organisation of matter and energy that can feasibly create alternate
timelines, but also the inevitability of human choices and decisions. If you choose not to hit the pool cue, nothing will happen.. But if you do, the
inevitability that the ball would prevent itself from existing might make the information already be known before it even happens (something like
non-locality)..
And that could possibly make the pool cue disappear at the exact instant you DECIDE to hit the ball with the pool stick.
Not necessarily make it disappear at any point after that (whether it be before, during, or after its travel through the wormhole and going back in
time).
-ChriS
[edit on 23-8-2008 by BlasteR]