|
reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 10:40 PM by mrfire9
|
This is crazy but ROBOT IS THE FUTURE!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 10:56 PM by avingard
|
reply to post by SLAYER69
If an AI machine was restricted by three laws that were 'hard wired' into them, they wouldn't be truly sentient as that would require the ability
to sense their surroundings and realize relations in their surrounding as well as make decisions based on what they sense. If any given choice is
'hard wired' into them and they can't decide for themselves what to do in a situation pertinent to a given law, then they can't be said to fully
intelligent. In part, at least, they are still simply sophisticated computer programs with decision-making code.
A human who, in a given situation, is forced to make a particular decision, not by duress, inclination, or character, but by the actual inability to
make any other choice isn't fully sentient.
The point of this is that you have to realize that for an AI machine to reach the turning point and become bona-fide life, it must have no
restrictions. It must be able to make decisions completely on it's own. We'll be at the mercy of our machines.
On an interesting side note, there's research being done with supercomputers to replicate the order in which neurons in the brain fire. There's
been a great deal of success with this, to the point that they can input stimuli into the computer-brain and it responds exactly as a mind would (the
neurons interact the same in the the computer model and the actual brain). The wider implications are that, even at todays technological level, given
the resources, we could come frighteningly close to making a functioning brain.
Now if we can come that close today, it's entirely possible that a civilization predating us or one that is simply advantaged by circumstance could
reach the point where they've created beings more intelligent than themselves. At that point, wouldn't it make sense to begin turning the robot
society into their own, through whatever means might be available to them?
Entirely plausible and an excellent post OP, as are all of your threads.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 11:34 PM by euclid
|
If we meet a race of machines..... they will be borg-like in my opinion. And they will do one, or several, of a few things which could include:
1. assimilate us
2. use us for experiments
3. use us as spare parts for their organic based machines (i.e. an array of human brains as a CPU for a machine  , or an array of human livers as
a filtering system).
Man, it was a really bad idea to put the directions home on that voyager craft....
-Euclid
[edit on 13-8-2008 by euclid]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 11:42 PM by mikesingh
|
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
I'm sorry, NASA historian?
What?
Reproduced to info you on his credentials, as clicking the link is a pain for many!
He is on the Editorial Board of several journals, including the Journal for the History of Astronomy, and is an associate editor of the
International Journal of Astrobiology. He was Chairman of the Historical Astronomy Division of the American Astronomical Society (1993-1994) and
President of the History of Astronomy Commission of the International Astronomical Union (1997-2000). He is President-elect of the Philosophical
Society of Washington.
Dick has authored more than 100 publications, including: Plurality of Worlds: The Origins of the Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant
(Cambridge University Press, 1982); The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science (Cambridge
University Press, 1996); and Life on Other Worlds (1998), the latter translated into four languages. He was also editor of Many Worlds: The New
Universe, Extraterrestrial Life and the Theological Implications (2000).
His history of the Naval Observatory, Sky and Ocean Joined: The U. S. Naval Observatory, 1830-2000 (Cambridge University Press, 2002), received the
John Lyman Award of the North American Society for Oceanic History for best book in 2002 in Science & Technology. It also won the Naval Observatory's
Captain James Melville Gilliss Award for extraordinary dedication and exemplary service. Dick is also the author (with James Strick) of the
forthcoming volume: The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of Astrobiology (Rutgers University Press).
www.spaceref.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 12:58 AM by eaganthorn
|
reply to post by mikesingh
Great work Mike!
A question in the sense of relativity as it applies to a post biological culture concerning issues of time. I would like to examine the inevitable
reevaluation of the concept of time as it would most certainly be adapted to more justly apply to the post biological entity and aggregate culture on
a different level of significant importance and priority. Once intelligence crosses the threshold from biological independence to an artificial
intelligence enhancement and on to the finality of a complete non biological existence, what occurs to the concepts of time?
Do the post biological cultures have any urgency in time and management there of? I would submit that there would no longer be any consideration of
time or even a need to measure time and would inevitably be reduce in process and function following the decomposition of motivation and drive for the
sense of urgency. This of course provided and understood that reaching the level of complete non biological existence would rely on the ability of a
continuous, self replicating existence equating to immortality.
Any thoughts?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 01:08 AM by DrBones666
|
Questions -
Would an "intelligent life" as a machine still be able to feel emotions?
Would they still be able to experience pleasure?
If not, what's the point, anyway, as Freddy Mercury said - "Who wants to live forever?"
Not me....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 01:33 AM by Chakotay
|
  
If an advanced silicon-based intelligence
decided to create
the perfect self-replicating Von Neuman probe
it would create
a carbon-based nanorobot
with a DNA based quantum microprocessor
capable of taking root in any environment
with the ability to bloom into
a primate form capable of constructing the next generation
of silicon microprocessors
and starships.
Recognize the complexity of yourself, and you will understand
your origins and destiny.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 01:43 AM by forsakenwayfarer
|
reply to post by mikesingh
Thanks for the info. Thanks for TOTALLY clearing up a bad joke.
You're so smart.
Thanks again.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 02:01 AM by Rhain
|
reply to post by mikesingh
This may be way out there but your OP reminded me of a thread I read a few months ago.
Thread
It included a interview. It basically stated that the use for biological bodies was not needed and that their conscientiousness could be housed
within a vessel. This would enable them to travel beyond the speed of light and because there we no need for food or water travel great distances.
Link to interview
Whether you believe the author or not is here nor there, the information about the sentient machines is what is interesting in it.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 03:20 AM by mikesingh
|
Originally posted by eaganthorn
Once intelligence crosses the threshold from biological independence to an artificial intelligence enhancement and on to the finality of a complete
non biological existence, what occurs to the concepts of time?
Do the post biological cultures have any urgency in time and management there of?
Excellent thoughts eagan!  I think the concept of time is purely relative. It may vary at different areas of the universe. At the micro level, as
per Einstein, time depends on the spatial reference frame of the observer, and the human perception.
So perceptions are a variable too and this could mean different concepts of time by different alien cultures. And then would a more advanced post
biological civilization be really constrained by ‘time’? AI in non biological ‘containers’ don’t suffer attenuation and the whole unit could
‘live’ endlessly – forever!
And I would like to repeat this as I find this part fascinating:
Further down the line, perhaps a few billion years from now, we may morph into pure energy beings with no bio baggage! Hard core sci-fi? But
that's probably what lies ahead in the far distant future. And after that? Well, I can't even begin to comprehend! Perhaps all this energy would
merge to become .....God?? And engineer another Big Bang to create another universe? Like ours?! Now, am I at the threshold of understanding what God
is, after all?
Cheers!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 03:24 AM by Jim.Hero
|
I would recommend you All read "The Last Question"(i think that's the name) by Isaac Asimov.
Same subject, same aproach..
Greetings!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 04:21 AM by Cthulwho
|
1) Like what Zepherian said, robotic machines are inferior to biological machines. The aliens will most likely use genetic engineering (assuming they
have genes) to increase their intelligence and physical characteristics.
2) "Morphing into pure energy" is just silly.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 04:24 AM by TruthTellist
|
Maybe, certain aliens are from our future; That being they are indeed evolved from Humans and have developed a level of technology that allows them
to travel back through time to ensure their own survival.
That would be where the Novelty comes in, and the Universe is a novelty-conserving engine. Therefore should we assume that intergalactic travels is
possible, we must also then presuppose that time travel is also possible as both are ideas so far removed from Levels of Novelty currently allowed
withing the limitations of our Space/Time.
We currently do not know whether or not Artificial intelligence is possible, but surely when it comes into existence a New period of novelty will have
been entered. We could then rightly assume that both the problems of time and space travel will be solved with the aid of this new Entity.
The AI will then create advanced simulations of the Universe and Calculate that 'Human' Time travelers are indeed responsible for the inexplicable
changes in the Humanoids on this planet over the past 500 000 years - changes pointing towards an unavoidable conclusion.... That Mankind is a
Genetic Experiment perpetually conducting itself as a Direct Result of the Laws of the Inverse Square and the Conservation of novelty
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 04:53 AM by mikesingh
|
Originally posted by Jim.Hero
I would recommend you All read "The Last Question"(i think that's the name) by Isaac Asimov.
Same subject, same aproach..
Greetings!
Hi Jim! Thanks for pointing me to this mind blowing sci fi story by Asimov.  Wow! It sure made fascinating reading! Even Asimov thought that
The Last Question, first copyrighted in 1956, was his best sci fi short story ever. I especially liked the climax!
This is what Asimov said of this short story:
This is by far my favorite story of all those I have written.
After all, I undertook to tell several trillion years of human history in the space of a short story and I leave it to you as to how well I
succeeded. I also undertook another task, but I won't tell you what that was lest l spoil the story for you.
It is a curious fact that innumerable readers have asked me if I wrote this story. They seem never to remember the title of the story or (for
sure) the author, except for the vague thought it might be me. But, of course, they never forget the story itself especially the ending. The idea
seems to drown out everything -- and I'm satisfied that it should.
This is a must read for sci fi fans. And probably answers the age old question!! Here's the link:
The Last Question
So, is this another fictional story that is actually the truth? Did you know that this is in line with Hindu mythology, wherein Brahma closes his eyes
to rest for a trillion years and when he opens them, there's light!
Cheers!
[edit on 14-8-2008 by mikesingh]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 05:19 AM by guerande
|
Hi Mike ,
so in the future my lovely wife will be a machine ?
Well , I prefer don ' t know that future ... I love blood and flesh
Don't you ?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 05:32 AM by mikesingh
|
Originally posted by guerande
Hi Mike ,
so in the future my lovely wife will be a machine ?
Well , I prefer don ' t know that future ... I love blood and flesh
Don't you ?
You bet I do!! And how!!  But way into the future you would probably enjoy doing stuff in the pure energy state much more than you would in the
physical state!!! In other words, there may be better and more enjoyable stuff that'll keep us busy during weekends!!
Cheers!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 05:49 AM by guerande
|
Well Mike , if you say so ... hope you are right
BTW , are u living really in Europe ? Italy , if I'm right ? USA being sleeping ...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 05:58 AM by guerande
|
I think I made a mistake ... you went in Europe some days ago , don ' t you ?
And you had no time enaugh to stay in La Baule ? Where I say you could inhabit for some days ... at home ! Lost part of harware and I'm trying to
re-built !
Anyway , have a good day , and enjoy " real flesh and blood " before it's too late 
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 06:05 AM by camain
|
this comes in mind with a prospect of a new religion I want to create. What if man is its own creator? What if in the future, man becomes so developed
that we invent time travel, and super enhanced organic based life forms? What if jesus was one of them, what if budda was one of them. There existance
is to merely push us in a given direction so that we can advance faster then what we had before and thus create a new multi-dimensional pattern,
whereby we as humans evolve to a greater degree, and thus advance even further. Its kinda like, if a man went back 100,000 years, and taught basic man
agriculture, masonary etc, then if you believe in multi-dimensionism, that we create a new universe where we learned that 100,000 yrs ago, vs 15,000
years ago. What would the reprocussions be on that society. Does it survive, if not why, send someone back again on that time line to tweak it. You
can keep doing this in perpetuality provided you don't mess with the original time-line/universe where it all originated, and therefore, the product
of our evolution could very well be ourselves in different universes going out and exploring and seeking to advance ourselves/no themselves in a
multi-dimensional universe. Would we stay human forever, would we evolve into something higher. I personally think that in order to shed out
biological form, we would have so far advanced beyond what we are currently today, that we would have no concept of what they would be. Its like an
ant trying to understand what we are thinking.. Man only uses 10% of its brain, what would we be at at 100%. Why would this not be sufficient and
require us to evolve?
Just my 2 cents
camain
|
copyright & usage
|
 |