Some of the best ghost footage ive ever seen...or is it?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 26 times


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 02:33 PM by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by h3akalee
reply to
post by gimme_some_truth



No im just trying to be rational by suggesting some possible explanation's that are a little more down to earth.

Please dont be offended by them im just trying to be logical.

Take care.

Regards
Lee



Dont worry Im not offended at all. I went back and reread what you said and realized you were just responding to my question of way it could be faked. My fault.

Forgive my screwup there buddy

To everyone in this thread: Still nothing from the video owner yet. of course it hasnt really been that long since I wrote him. Untill then I cant wait to hear more of your opinions about these video.

[edit on 22-7-2008 by gimme_some_truth]

[edit on 22-7-2008 by gimme_some_truth]

[edit on 22-7-2008 by gimme_some_truth]


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 02:47 PM by inspiringyouth
Theres a few things no ones really addressing... The paper towel roll the way it flips through the air, that wouldn't happen from a string, it couldn't. The light in the attic never went off, it was more like a filter was placed on the lens, you can still see the light is on it just becomes dark.

No one said anything about the camera losing focus either, that doesn't happen to a stationary camera with out objects in the view moving, and it seemed to be a good camera, it didn't lose focus when the dogs, paper towels, or the door moved, but when nothing is moving at all it goes out of focus?

In the video with the "spirit" watch his shadow as he walks back into the room, if he edited it right he could have faked that one pretty easy, but again the picture frame it sways not just lifts, if he did that with fishing string it would lift peak and then fall back, the frame sways pendulum style.

It could be faked, but not to easily, it would take a lot more effort then others have suggested.

Although there are a few things that got me, like why he would be filming his dogs in the first video? Also why he would just set the camera down facing that particular direction and not turn it off. I can understand the other two videos, but he could just be a weird animal person to, which would also explain why he was talking to himself in the attic, I'm skeptical but by far these are some of the creepiest videos I've seen in a very long time.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 02:58 PM by kidflash2008
reply to post by gimme_some_truth



I do know how he could get the dogs to be terrified and the cat to be angry. I know some of you will laugh, but I think the owner could of had a vacuum cleaner off camera. My dogs were terrified of the vacuum cleaner and it took quite a while after I would get done using it to calm them down. Yes, they would go under a bed, or all of them would cram up in a crate, but they hated the dreadful vacuum. When I would take out the vacuum, their ears would fold back and they would give me those sad puppy eyes. I don't know how he did the other tricks, but I know how he got the dogs to act scared by really scaring them with a vacuum or some other thing they might be scared of.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 03:10 PM by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to
post by gimme_some_truth



I do know how he could get the dogs to be terrified and the cat to be angry. I know some of you will laugh, but I think the owner could of had a vacuum cleaner off camera. My dogs were terrified of the vacuum cleaner and it took quite a while after I would get done using it to calm them down. Yes, they would go under a bed, or all of them would cram up in a crate, but they hated the dreadful vacuum. When I would take out the vacuum, their ears would fold back and they would give me those sad puppy eyes. I don't know how he did the other tricks, but I know how he got the dogs to act scared by really scaring them with a vacuum or some other thing they might be scared of.


You know, you raise a very good point. I didnt think of that. The thing is that the dogs are looking up at something that seems to be scaring them. Of course it could be possible that he picked up the vaccuum. hmm..

good point. star for you.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 03:22 PM by kidflash2008
reply to post by gimme_some_truth



Some auto focus cameras tend to focus by themselves if there is no real focal point they are pointed at. My dad had a camera that would try to focus on other objects if someone went out of the range of the camera. He could set the camera to refocus in a certain time. With the way anything can be programmed to do what you want it to. He could of turned on and off the lights and moved the cameras. In the one video, the dogs go back into the living room and are looking at their master. I am beginning to think this is a hoax the more I think about it.
He did a very good job of hoaxing it though.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 03:38 PM by justamomma
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to
post by gimme_some_truth



I do know how he could get the dogs to be terrified and the cat to be angry. I know some of you will laugh, but I think the owner could of had a vacuum cleaner off camera. My dogs were terrified of the vacuum cleaner and it took quite a while after I would get done using it to calm them down. Yes, they would go under a bed, or all of them would cram up in a crate, but they hated the dreadful vacuum. When I would take out the vacuum, their ears would fold back and they would give me those sad puppy eyes. I don't know how he did the other tricks, but I know how he got the dogs to act scared by really scaring them with a vacuum or some other thing they might be scared of.


first off, this is a very good alternative view point to the animals acting the way they did in the 2nd view.

had a friend who rewatched the first and since i should be working, therefore not paying THAT great attention, i concede my paper towel arguement. still, the whole thing seemed pretty cheesy to me, imo.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 03:51 PM by alienj
As a photoshop editor i clearly saw editing done around the door everytime it was pushed open, there had cleary been some type of editing done. Also the ball of light is frequent in filming during daylight hours indoord due to the amount of dust that is kicked up. They are dust particles floating that the camera see's but doesnt know how to interpret. As for the dogs, well, how accommodating was it that what the dogs was looking at was off camera and everything else was on camera. This is in my opinion a ver elaborate hoax. I wont even comment on the fake glowing eyes, btw I have a set a pull out at halloween time if someone needs to borrow them for a tube video just holler. Also did you guys notice in the 3rd video how the dog reacted to the camera, the dog hates the camera, more than likely the camera has a red light on it that freaks the dog out. Basically its all a:
FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA_______KEFAKE________FAKE__________FAKE_FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFF______FAKEFAKE_______FAKE________FAKE___FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFF_____FAKEFAKEFA______FAKE_______FAKE____FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKE__________________FAKE____FAKE_____FAKE______FAKE_____FAKE______________
FAKE_________________FAKE______FAKE____FAKE____FAKE_______FAKE______________
FAKE________________FAKE________FAKE___FAKE_FAKEFA________FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKEFAKE___________FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKEFAK____________FAKE______________
FAKEFAKEFAKEF______FAKE__________FAKE__FAKEFAK____________FAKEFAKEFAKEE_____
FAKEFAKEFAKEF______FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA__FAKEFAKE___________FAKEFAKEFAKEE_____
FAKEFAKEFAKEF______FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA__FAKE_FAKE__________FAKEFAKEFAKEE_____
FAKE_______________FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA__FAKE__FAKE_________FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE____FAKE_______FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE_____FAKE______FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE______FAKE_____FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE_______FAKE____FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE________FAKE___FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE_________FAKE__FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE__________FAKE_FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEAK

[edit on 22-7-2008 by alienj]

[edit on 22-7-2008 by alienj]


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 03:54 PM by Swingarm
reply to post by gimme_some_truth



Yes thats right , I think it's fishing line. Some guy/gal in the closet, and the dogs are afraid of either weather or the vacuum cleaner as someone else said.
That being said my wife has seen shadow people before, twice in the same public building. I believe in the paranormal just reject this particular attempt at it.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 03:56 PM by Alethia
I'm gonna take a stance similar to that seen on TAPs, which is trying to see if something could be explained by something other than paranormal activity. I only watched the first video but it was enough for me to say that all those things could be explained by something else.

The radio interference: The radio is off-screen, so somebody could be manipulating it in time with the other events. Alternatively, the sound could even have been added in post-production, after the fact. It's sound that we can't see eminating from a stereo or speaker system so it could be explained a number of ways. I wasn't there, so I only have the visual evidence, which isn't conclusive.

The kitchen towel moving: Could easily be done by someone hiding behind the chair and pulling it via a string.

The dogs reacting to something at the end of the video: They are reacting to and looking at something behind the camera off-screen. Because it's off-screen, it could be anyone, we can't see, so it can't be claimed as paranormal, someone could be standing there

The closet door opening and closing: The weirdest thing to me about this is that it happens in clear stages, not one smooth movement. First the handle jiggles. Well someone could have been behind the door jiggling it. Then it opens a bit and stops, then opens further and stops, and then closes. This reminds me of Ghost Hunters episode where they were on the QE2 and the bed apparently unfurled itself before they realized someone had tampered with the camera. The camera was locked off, and someone hid behind the bed, pulled it a bit, then someone paused recording, then started it again whilst someone hid behind the bed and pulled the bed clothes down further.

The same thing here. The camera is locked off so someone could have been behind the door, jiggling the handle. Then the recording was paused and re-started once someone got into the new position and the door was opened either using some string pully system, or someone could've been on the top shelf of the closet out of sight and just pushed the door open (my closet has a top shelf that sits above the door frame and a kid could easily get in there and hide from view). The recording is paused again, and a string pully system is reset to open it further (hence the non-smooth motion we see int he footage, because it's a two stage process), then the camera is paused again to reset a string pully system to close the door shut.

Is this what happened? I don't know. Do I think I could produce a similar result using the above techniques outlined? Yeah, I think I could. So on that basis, and as accepted by TAPs, you have to say that it is not conclusive evidence of paranormal activity.


reply posted on 22-7-2008 @ 04:10 PM by LeeHawt
FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA_______KEFAKE________FAKE__________FAKE_FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFF______FAKEFAKE_______FAKE________FAKE___FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFF_____FAKEFAKEFA______FAKE_______FAKE____FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKE__________________FAKE____FAKE_____FAKE______FAKE_____FAKE______________
FAKE_________________FAKE______FAKE____FAKE____FAKE_______FAKE______________
FAKE________________FAKE________FAKE___FAKE_FAKEFA________FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKEFAKE___________FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKEFAK____________FAKE______________
FAKEFAKEFAKEF______FAKE__________FAKE__FAKEFAK____________FAKEFAKEFAKEE_____
FAKEFAKEFAKEF______FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA__FAKEFAKE___________FAKEFAKEFAKEE_____
FAKEFAKEFAKEF______FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA__FAKE_FAKE__________FAKEFAKEFAKEE_____
FAKE_______________FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFA__FAKE__FAKE_________FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE____FAKE_______FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE_____FAKE______FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE______FAKE_____FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE_______FAKE____FAKE______________
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE________FAKE___FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE_________FAKE__FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKFAK
FAKE_______________FAKE__________FAKE__FAKE__________FAKE_FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEAK


Looks FAKE to me also its easy to scare dogs
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Paranormal photos: separate the wheat from the chaff.
  Posted 8 days ago with 67 member flags
What the hell is this next to my son....?!?
  Posted 19 days ago with 42 member flags
Shared Dreaming Experiment
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
To those who can have OBEs
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
My Ghost Radar Predicts a Mega-Quake on June 15, 2012 at Noon!
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags
Bompa
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags