Originally posted by Fathom
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
I have however heard from various sources that "timeline travel" with regards to remote viewing is possible, and that there are "remote viewing"
trained spies that specifically watch certain events, like as an example, the JFK assassination, and they are there to keep the "regular Joe
citizen" from finding out the truth about those events, via killing them while in the realm of travel.
this is the sort of delusional crap that i am speaking about.
this is the genius of the disinfo agent to make the quacks believe this crap and come out of the woodwork and discredit any real advances made in a
particular field...in this case remote viewing.
take all the sci-fi, men in black, holy roller spiritual crap out of the way and you will see the truth.
Wow, just wow, either I just got insulted really deeply, or you basically just called Me a complete idiot, and here I thought you actually were
talking about the topic, not being an overbearing snob about your perspective.
I don't know who the Hell you think you are, or where the Hell you get off attacking anyone's beliefs in something
YOU can
neither prove nor disprove yourself.
I do believe I stated I had heard, but not that I believed it.
I can neither prove nor disprove something like what the sources mentioned, but I'd never just turn around and call someone a quack.
Anything is possible and I do mean anything is possible, when it comes to something like remote viewing, astral projection, or out of body
experiences, because you are not dealing with regular linear thinking being that it's not the actual physical but the principle of more spiritual
aspect that you are doing things which are impossible in the regular realm of being, and going through meditation as well as a different state of
conciousness to be able to do something like this to begin with.
I'm thinking your stating here that a disinformation agent would be someone to tell someone something so silly so as to misdirect them into an area
where they have gone out of the range of believeability, but what if what you're stating here is helping do their work for them?
If an organization like the C.I.A. would spend more money than multiple Third-World countries have in their lifetimes, there has to be a lot more to
it to begin with, let alone the actual process where we as "Joe citizen" know of or consider.
I've read on Joseph McMoneagle and Russell Targ, both people who were supposed to have been involved directly with the C.I.A. in their research, and
I think they seem to be pretty forthcoming with the majority of what they have to say as well as they leave it open to interpretation based on the
fact that you are supposed to be open-minded in this area, because preconceived notions can pretty much totally sabotage your even being able to do
this process of remote viewing let alone someone being able to grow in all things spiritual.
Just from what you've stated here, I know from their stated beliefs that they would say you are extremely arrogant in what you're stating, even if
you're trying to prove what they had to say was 100% real and you were trying to bust a hoax.
I'm not insulting you here, and I don't go following blindly anyone because I do not totally trust anyone, but by your statement just in reply to
what I've said let alone what you've stated to other people, I pretty have to say I would never want to listen to anything you have to say in order
to believe it ever again because of your willingness to essentially thrash anyone else's beliefs that don't fit into your exacting specifications.
I think you need to work on your people skills, in that your reply was so basic in that it leaves it sounding like you're calling anyone you wanted
to listen to your point of view as a potential nutcase, just for believing anything you don't believe.
Yes, remote viewing is possible, but what we need to realize as fellow ATS'ers, is that while it is possible, until we can achieve the state of doing
something like it, we have absolutely no right to trash someone else's beliefs in it itself.
I thought you wanted a civil discussion, not a one sided rant against anyone who doesn't believe in your beliefs 100%.
Yes, I do know and understand a "disinformation agent" would go to any extreme just to throw someone off the right path, but by your reaction there,
I'd sure have an easier time believing anyone but you right about now.
[edit on 20-7-2008 by SpartanKingLeonidas]