Car Bomb Explodes Outside Pentagon: A 9-11 Diversion?

Never heard of that one. Supposedly John F. Kennedy's older brother Joe died on a mission in WW2 that was a forerunner of remote control; airplane guided and used as a bomb. Needless to say, he was one of the first casualties of this technology.

I too do not believe a plane hit the Pentagon. Debris is all wrong for a plane crash.

But the big question I have, is why weren't the aircraft parts salvaged and reconstructed like we see in almost every aircraft accident? In most accidents, they take painstaking care to salvage every aircraft part larger than 1 inch. There was plenty of information that could be told by attempting this. At the very least, it would have proved an aircraft strike. Why weren't at least some aircraft parts salvaged and photographed for all to see???

I also have the same questions for the planes that hit the WTC.

www.freerepublic.com...

Read the posts this chat room had, it will take you back to that morning...

I also agree that the Pentagon crash was fishy. LOOK OVER HERE! CARBOMB!

swooooosh! BOOM! Everyone's paying attention over here, so they're not looking at the point of impact. Classic sleight of hand.

Was the airplane ever pieced back together with whatever parts were found, as Qwas mentioned.. was there enuff debris, period, to even try?

When the hell is the FBI gonna release those video tapes of the Pentagon hit? They were there, recording it all.

Hmm, I don't really get how you could NOT have seen the pics of so called debris of a 'plane'. The Main Media was full with it..
There were some small pieces being carried away, but they are not the size of a B737. Heres some pics:
www.publiceye.org...
But, unfortunately for the main media, it doesn't quite fit a b737:
the-movement.com...

Thats the biggest piece they found.. They also found a part of an enigine, but it didn't fit a B-737, i thought it even fit the Global Hawk (the done planes)
There are about 2 other small pieces, all caried away by hand! (meaning it could also have been put there by hand..)

Anyway i hope i helped u a bit with the pic

QUOTE : "swooooosh! BOOM! Everyone's paying attention over here, so they're not looking at the point of impact. Classic sleight of hand. "

sorry , that simply does not work , please look at the SIZE of the pentagon complex and the roads / vantage points surrounding it

your " diversion " will cause at least 20% of pottential witnesses who react to look TOWARDS wedge one , which is according to you exactly what you are trying to distract them from

No way did a plane hit the Pentagon. The hole it made was far too small for a jet.

Anyway, why is it that everybody in the US mentions a Boeing 737? The media in the UK reported it as a 747

If you look at the pics of pentagon the hole isn't as big as you think it would be for a plane to hit it..it looks like something smaller.(missle)