It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Car Bomb Explodes Outside Pentagon: A 9-11 Diversion?

page: 6
1
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 25 2004 @ 10:31 PM
link   
Please go here:

letsroll911.org...

and tell me what you think of the evidence there?




posted on Jul, 25 2004 @ 10:45 PM
link   
I really didn't read through all of this thread....and I really don't want to. But I don't know if you're anywhere near the DC are ECK, if you were then you would know that there were NUMEROUS false reports (maybe only a few important buildings went without a report that they were attacked or on fire or something to that effect) that day throughout the day. Were those "distractions" too?



posted on Jul, 26 2004 @ 11:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
I really didn't read through all of this thread....and I really don't want to. But I don't know if you're anywhere near the DC are ECK, if you were then you would know that there were NUMEROUS false reports (maybe only a few important buildings went without a report that they were attacked or on fire or something to that effect) that day throughout the day. Were those "distractions" too?


I have eyes and ears there and nearby.

What 'numerous reports' are you referring to?



posted on Dec, 31 2004 @ 05:36 AM
link   
Along these same lines, did anyone hear Rumsfeld 'misspeak' about Flight 93 being shot down when he visited the troops on Christmas?


Here is a theory page about Flight 93



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 09:01 AM
link   
I didn't hear that. What did he say exactly?

Flight 93 is not a part of this thread, but I will add my two cents re: the info. you posted. I believe the aircraft was being flown by remote control. The passengers probably disabled the hijackers (who thot they'd be safely landing somewhere), and as they were making their way toward the cockpit, the aircraft was shot down. Had they gotten into the cockpit, they would've had access to the radio - and transmitting that the plane was being flown by itself was definitely not part of the plan. The powers behind the coup simply ordered the plaine shot down. End of story. Begin fiction.. Information regarding this theory can be found at the ATS 9-11 research thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 09:49 AM
link   
Just to add, I'm in the UK and there were definitely reports of a car bomb going off outside "somewhere" (definitely not the Pentagon) on the BBC and I'm sure ITV and C4 as well. As said, this was early during the crisis when everything was confused - but nothing more was ever said about it, and I watched the news for about 24hrs solid. I always wondered what happened but just figured it was a "crossed wire" and the networks dropped it once they released.......they had plenty of other things to report that day after all



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Curio
Just to add, I'm in the UK and there were definitely reports of a car bomb going off outside "somewhere" (definitely not the Pentagon) on the BBC and I'm sure ITV and C4 as well. As said, this was early during the crisis when everything was confused - but nothing more was ever said about it, and I watched the news for about 24hrs solid. I always wondered what happened but just figured it was a "crossed wire" and the networks dropped it once they released.......they had plenty of other things to report that day after all


This is exactly what happen as far as I'm concered. And I remember this well as well. BECAUSE, it was the first thing I heard when I turned on the TV set. The cable was out in our building (as they were trying to install cable in to my new apartment.. so of course they instead screwed it ALL up) so I was trying to just get some morning news.. didn't have a clue anything was going on at all.. my girl was just getting up for school and work.. so when I finally 'tuned' in a channel I heared.. "AND A TRUCK BOMB HAS JUST EXPLODED OUTSIDE THE PENTAGON" and so I right away called up my family to say "Did you hear what just happened at the pentagon.. a truck bomb just exploded!" to which they replied "Did you know that the towers are gone TOO?!"

So yeah, it was CBS news and it was .. Rather who told me the truck bomb went off. I remember it VERY clearly (though the picture itself was of course terrible). It was the begining of my personal 9-11 experience.

But was it a distraction dude? No man, it was just a bad report like the 100s of other ones. If anything it should perhaps call in to question the fact that a plane hit the building.. why would ANYONE think a truck bomb had gone off if a frelling plane hit the building? Why.. well we know why.. no wreckage.. not much damage.. etc..etc..

... but I don't want to get in to THAT stuff on THIS thread.

But I did want to let you know (like curio) that you did not hear wrong, and a report of a truck bomb at the pentagon was reported... even though it was .. not accurate.



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 10:53 AM
link   
Has anyone here ever heard of the term "rumor?" Do you honestly expect CNN to be 100% correct 100% of the time?

And as for the cell phone issue. It is quite possible to make cell calls in flight.


money.cnn.com...



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 10:56 AM
link   
I was monitering the developments on several screens/channels/and internet. I only recall the one report of the carbomb. It was actually reported to have gone off outside the State department, as noted previously in this thread. I believe it was a diversion away from whatever it was that went into the Pentagon. It was forgotten as quickly as it was reported - and never corrected, to my knowledge.



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 01:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by wolfpsy
Please go here:

letsroll911.org...

and tell me what you think of the evidence there?



JMHO but I think most of what he stated about WTC7 appears to have been made up. If the building was a controlled demolition why is there no mention of the series of explosions that would have taken place?

Again JMHO but I think he saw the video of the men in the fire house and heard them "say it was like a demolition" he then made his story up. Surely if the building was pulled as he put it everyone around would have heard the exlosions won't they?

Enough said.



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 03:10 PM
link   
And this has what to do with the thread's topic? I appreciate the post, but we should try keeping to the subject.



posted on Mar, 6 2005 @ 02:42 AM
link   
I've always wondered this. I live in BC canada and I woke up to my dad on the answering machine from work at 6:30 am saying "turn on the tv". I definately remember the car bomb thing, I believe it was CNN reporting a car bomb had exploded outside the STATE DEPARTMENT. I clearly remember that report, I'm positive thats what they said, i remember thinking holy # i wonder what else is going to happen. then they just sotpped reporting it and it fizzled away. interesting you brought this up.



posted on Mar, 13 2005 @ 01:33 PM
link   
It's funny how we remember things, like the events of that morning. So much was going on, and we were all pretty much in a state of shock as we watched events unfold. You are correct. There was a report of a carbomb going off outside the state department. I THOUGHT it was the Pentagon. I believe it was a diversion of some kind.



posted on Mar, 23 2005 @ 07:00 AM
link   
CARBOMB AND EPILECTIC ATTACK!!!! IF WE REMEMBER CORRECTLY SHORTLY BEFORE THE EXECUTION OF KENNEDY THE DIVERSIONARY ATTACK OF A MAN HAVING AN EPILECTIC ATTACK WAS USED IN DALLAS..A MAN THAT ATTRACTED A LOT A POLICE AND SERVICES ATTENTION AND WAS TAKEN AWAY IN AN AMBULANCE BUT SUPRISE SUPRISE NEVER ENTERED A HOSPITAL AND VANISHED WITHOUT A TRACE..



posted on Mar, 23 2005 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by andy1972
CARBOMB AND EPILECTIC ATTACK!!!! IF WE REMEMBER CORRECTLY SHORTLY BEFORE THE EXECUTION OF KENNEDY THE DIVERSIONARY ATTACK OF A MAN HAVING AN EPILECTIC ATTACK WAS USED IN DALLAS..A MAN THAT ATTRACTED A LOT A POLICE AND SERVICES ATTENTION AND WAS TAKEN AWAY IN AN AMBULANCE BUT SUPRISE SUPRISE NEVER ENTERED A HOSPITAL AND VANISHED WITHOUT A TRACE..


Interesting.. I don't know if I recall that detail about JFK's assassination. Seems like I do.. Where did it occur? Did it take eyes off the grassy knoll, perhaps?



posted on Mar, 23 2005 @ 01:27 PM
link   
1. There was an early report of a bomb outside the Pentagon, I remember that bieng reported. NOt sure how this ould be a diversion, and for who???So people aren't watching the sky for the BIG ASS jet coming toward the Pentagon. I thought the initial report was becasue of the plane hitting. THey changed it from a car bomb to a terror attack wit the plane. I remember this chain of events that day.

2. A plane hit the pentagon. I know witnesses that work in DC.

3. We shot down flight 93. Even if the occupants were taking control, we shot it down.

4. No controlled demo's in NY.There is no way that could be covered up...

5. Never forget the innocent lives of the civilians and fire fighters/police who died that day. That is all that truly needs to be remembered.



posted on Mar, 23 2005 @ 01:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71
1. There was an early report of a bomb outside the Pentagon,


The bogus report happened after the towers were hit. Documented report said it was the State Department - tho I swear I remember they said Pentagon (?). It may have been a diversion to draw attention off what maybe actually went into the Pentagon. Wish they'd let the world see those videos from nearby the FBI spirited away and threw into hell's black hole. That would be difinitive. Can y'all imagine how nice it would be to finally put that argument to rest?




3. We shot down flight 93. Even if the occupants were taking control, we shot it down.


I totally agree with that. Why? I contend those airplanes were hijacked by remote control (technology we have had for years despite what some say). The passengers were rushing the cockpit. Imagine if they had actually gotten in there, realized NO ONE was flying that plane, and they got on the horn and told the world. That was NOT an option. So they shot it down and put out the heroic tale instead. (not to say those folks weren't heroic in their effort.)



posted on Mar, 23 2005 @ 06:06 PM
link   
ECK

I can't buy the fly by remote aspect for the planes. Do we have it, yes, and they can land on their own now, can't they? If this was true, more than one person would know that it was bieng flown, and I think that is too much to keep quiet in this new CNN/Fox news century.

I feel they had to take out that plane fast, before reaching a major matro area, or continuing on to DC. I think we did not know the people aboard were close overtaking the hijackers, and that we shot it down.



posted on Mar, 24 2005 @ 12:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71
ECK

I can't buy the fly by remote aspect for the planes. Do we have it, yes, and they can land on their own now, can't they? If this was true, more than one person would know that it was bieng flown, and I think that is too much to keep quiet in this new CNN/Fox news century.


The technology is there. It has been for many years. You should look into it. (the technology was put in place/used specifically b/c of the many airline hijackings back in the '70's.) And just remember, the military's not gonna tell the public about the goodies they have. At least not until they're moving into a whole new arena of development.

There was an episode of the x-files spin-off LONE GUNMEN that specifically used this plot (to fly an airliner into the WTC). That was BEFORE 9-11. And the show was yanked shortly after. Hmmm... coincidence? I think not.



posted on Mar, 29 2005 @ 10:39 PM
link   
: si señor...the good ole U.S.A has had technologhy like that for many a year...it all began no doubt with the capture of the "craft" at Roswell in ´47(i think) ever read the book "El Caballo de Troya" by J J Benitez...in 1969 your country sent 2 pilots back 2000 years in time..and they spent a month with Jesus of Nazareth...Read it..




top topics



 
1
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join