 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 09:04 AM by COOL HAND
|
Originally posted by mrmulder
This www.geoffmetcalf.com... is part of the plane? Excuse my ignorance but when did that fall off? I see no burn marks on
it. Plus it looks completely clean. 
The other article talks about the physical effects on the aircraft at impact. That should answer your question.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 11:49 AM by EastCoastKid
|
Originally posted by Seekerof
The topic of the Pentagon and what hit it was and has been discussed very extensively here within ATS.
Has anyone discussed the diversion of the car bomb, though? I've never seen such a thread. It's interesting to note, that a few others do
remember it being reported. The supposed airplane that hit the Pentagon is an offshoot of this discussion. My claim is that the story on the car bomb
was put out there to divert attention from the larger target. Is this not reasonable?
As such, ECK....
Have you even found anything remotely confirming your theory or what you heard concerning this car/truck bomb episode, in regards to an article or
such?
If you do or did...a link would greatly be appreciated.
Cool Hand provided a link to an archive of 9-11 coverage that mentioned an alleged carbombing outside the state department. And that it was a false
alarm. Or, a diversion, if you will. I've been taking a look at the site.
Cool Hand, thanks for the link. It's got a lot of documentation, both mainstream media and legit government sources. The only problem I have is that
it is an obviously pro-Bush site, which could be considered biased. There is only one view, the government's view. (If you don't believe me, peruse
the books for sale.) The mention comes within the president's 9-11 timeline provided by Ari Fleischer. Official government version.
Kudos to mrmulder for the link of the photo showing debris. It would support my contention that there would at least be wing/tail fragments on the
lawn near the building.
Take a look at the debris photo and then jump over to this shot from American Airlines: www.amrcorp.com...
Looks like part of the tail. But then again, the debris photo could be a fake. (?) Any experts out there? An opinion of the debris photo would be
helpful.
Btw, I do recall hearing a report about a carbomb going off outside the Pentagon. Anyway, though; I hope that answers your questions,
Seekerof.
regards
seekerof
[Edited on 11-3-2004 by Seekerof] 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 01:29 PM by Banshee
|
ECK, you've been asked to back up your initial claim with links or other data that a car bomb at the Pentagon was reported before the plane struck
the Pentagon.
Others have shown evidence to the contrary, and evidence that reports of a car bomb at the State Department were later corrected & retracted by the
media.
If all you're going on is your memory of the events... well, that's not evidence. That's remembered info muddled by two and a half years of time
passing and hate.
-B.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 01:40 PM by McGotti
|
oh wait...we cant find any internet links....time to shut down the coversation...
I remember it aswell...It was probably set off to scare people out of the pentagon to reduce casualties...after all these were government personal and
not innocent people like in the trade towers..
Lets keep this debate going just for spite
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 02:13 PM by EastCoastKid
|
Thanks for the support McGotti.
I, too, see this as a useful debate. Afterall, what else is this site for? Discussion and debate. This is a valid thread that people have
contributed to and viewed. To shut it down would sort of support my contention, would it not? The state apperatus pushing their version would like
nothing better than to see a discussion of this nature shut down. No one has flamed anyone, and ideas have been bandied about. That is useful
when trying to sort out all of the extraneous details. Do you not agree, Banshee?
Originally posted by Banshee
ECK, you've been asked to back up your initial claim with links or other data that a car bomb at the Pentagon was reported before the plane struck
the Pentagon.
Others have shown evidence to the contrary, and evidence that reports of a car bomb at the State Department were later corrected & retracted by the
media.
It takes time to explore the links provided and to come up with more details.
If all you're going on is your memory of the events... well, that's not evidence. That's remembered info muddled by two and a half years of time
passing and hate.
hate? Sorry, where do you get that from? Everyone's been cool. I don't know, maybe there simply is something to this.
-B.

|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 02:46 PM by John Nada
|
Originally posted by Banshee
Others have shown evidence to the contrary, and evidence that reports of a car bomb at the State Department were later corrected & retracted by the
media.

To be fair Banshee my only involvment in this thread is I remember the reports of the car bomb as clear as day, they were on BBC and CNN. After I
never saw it mentioned again but I may have missed reports of a retraction of these claims, so I just wanted that clearing up.
Do you have links to reports retracting the car bomb story? If you do that would be great. Thanks.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 02:55 PM by Banshee
|
Have at it.
Archive of news reportings on 9-11 10:06am EST - 1ish EST
Remember that most information on that day was via TV & radio. I don't know of any online archive of 9-11 news as it happened other than
this.
Sarcasm duly noted, BTW.
-B.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 02:57 PM by John Nada
|
Originally posted by Banshee
Sarcasm duly noted, BTW.
-B.

Oh, I resent that Banshee, you don't know me very well do you? I was being serious, I was just asking for a link and thanking you in advance. 
I'm a nice guy for Christ's sake, I guess it just doesn't pay to have manners these days.
[Edited on 11-3-2004 by John Nada]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 03:08 PM by EastCoastKid
|
Originally posted by Banshee
Originally posted by John Nada
Have at it.
Archive of news reportings on 9-11 10:06am EST - 1ish EST
Your site mentioned a report on Fox news. I ran a search of all Fox news stories relating to that specifically and there was no match.
Still searching...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 03:11 PM by Banshee
|
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Your site mentioned a report on Fox news. I ran a search of all Fox news stories relating to that specifically and there was no match.
Still searching... 
Remember that most information on that day was via TV & radio. I don't know of any online archive of 9-11 news **as it happened** other than
this.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 03:37 PM by EastCoastKid
|
Agent of Disinformation?
Here's some of what I've found...
As If Reality Wasn't Bad Enough
Dan Rather spread alarmist rumors on September 11
By Jim Naureckas
In a national emergency like the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the first thing required from the news media is accurate
information. Unfortunately, TV journalists too often delivered misinformation instead. One who did so repeatedly was CBS News' Dan Rather.
www.fair.org...
This site is no good:
TCM Breaking News - 2001/09/11: Car bombing outside of State ...
TCM Archives > TCM Breaking News > 2001/09/11
> Car bombing outside of State Department. ...
archives.tcm.ie/breakingnews/2001/09/11/story23319.asp -
25k - Cached - Similar pages
Been scrubbed, maybe?
An article from Slate.msn.com:
Bruland passes on a rumor that a car bomb has exploded at the State Department. We race over to Foggy Bottom and find utter quiet. A State Department
cop says of the bomb rumor, "That's unconfirmed, sir." We walk the perimeter of the building, and find no sign of a bomb or any other chaos. Yet
when we return to the Slate bureau at 12:05 p.m., National Public Radio is reporting that a bomb has indeed exploded near Foggy Bottom. Perhaps there
was a bomb elsewhere, or there was no bomb at all. It's impossible to know anything this morning.
slate.msn.com...
Excellent diversion, huh?
Colin Powell to Nato en route back to Washington:
"You may have gotten an earlier report that there was a car bomb outside the State Department, but that is not the case."
www.nato.int...
Nato was worried about it. No small thing.
Pentagon attacked
by Ron Fournier
Associated Press
WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon was struck by aircraft, a car bomb exploded outside the State Department and agents patrolled outside the White House with
automatic weapons Tuesday as an apparent coordinated terrorist attack spread fear and chaos in the nation's capital.
www.savannahnow.com...
"The day didn't just end at [the Pennsylvania crash of United Airlines Flight] 93," said Army Brig. Gen. W. Montague Winfield, who was at the
Pentagon that day. "We were responding to possible hijackings. … We had a car bomb reported at the State Department."
"It ran on the crawler on the TV that a car bomb had exploded outside the State Department," Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said. "I
went out and looked with diplomatic security and didn't see anything, called my colleagues around town and, on the video conference screen, told them
there was nothing to it."
abcnews.go.com...
From Poynter:
8:41 NBC cuts to correspondent Jim Miklaszewski, who reports from the Pentagon that the building just shook and he sees construction workers
scattering from the area. “It appears to be a small blast. Windows rattled. The building shook.” He promises more details as soon as he can gather
them. “Please be careful,” urges Katie Couric.
8:42 ABC’s Clair Shipman reports smoke coming from behind the Old Executive Office Building. There is video of the smoke, from a camera position near
Lafayette Park. No definitive word on what we are seeing.
NBC’s Miklaszewski is back with word that the Pentagon is being cleared. “This appears to be a highly sophisticated, coordinated attack.”
CBS reports from the Pentagon that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine has claimed responsibility for the acts.
8:44 ABC reports a fire at the Pentagon and evacuation of personnel.
9:32 ABC reports that an American Airlines headed from Dulles to LA was hijacked, with 60 passengers and crew on board. Jennings reads an AP report of
an car bomb outside the State Department.
www.poynter.org...
There are many reports. All of a car bomb outside the State Department, not the Pentagon. At least I havn't seen any on that. So, I was wrong on
that part. Apologies.
The bottom line, though, is that if Colin Powell had to re-assure Nato that there was no bomb at State, it was taken very seriously. I do believe it
was an attempt to divert attention away from the big target: whatever it was that went into the Pentagon.
[Edited on 19-09-2003 by EastCoastKid]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 03:42 PM by Banshee
|
Thanks for finding those, ECK.
There was a lot of confusion that morning and a lot of incorrect reports.
I wouldn't call that diversion, though.
When you report news and are faced with a breaking story of this magnitude, all you can do is go on what you've got. Witnesses will report seeing
smoke somewhere, and you get that word out because people want to know. After confirming the information, some of it will prove to be false in some
way.
The same thing plays out in any breaking news situation. Trust me.
-B.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 03:54 PM by John Nada
|
Originally posted by Banshee
When you report news and are faced with a breaking story of this magnitude, all you can do is go on what you've got. Witnesses will report seeing
smoke somewhere, and you get that word out because people want to know. After confirming the information, some of it will prove to be false in some
way.

I don't doubt that for one second Banshee, but there was never a retraction of the story which is what's always bugged me about it. I heard it on 3
seperate news sources including CNN and BBC, but after even years passed I just let it go as I assumed that it had been retracted.
However, ever since ECK mentioned it I've looked into it and found no retractions from ANY of the 3 sources. Sure, these things play sometimes but
out of 3 one of them was bound to have retracted the story, they nearly always do, trust me.
I think we can be certain this bomb didn't take place, but I'm certainly going to look into it now as it's got my attention.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 04:43 PM by EastCoastKid
|
You're right, John Nada. They simply swept the story under the rug. It does bear further looking into.
I'm well aware of what the media pulls, Banshee. You have no idea how well I know.
And diversions do happen. When needed. When you are not trained in the art, you do not recognize it. That's the "beauty" of it.
[Edited on 19-09-2003 by EastCoastKid]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2004 @ 05:31 PM by flexipaul
|
you are right they did report that they also had a witness on the ground not sure if it was live or by phone who said they were clearing people away
because they thought there was a bomb
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-4-2004 @ 09:29 PM by tigre35
|
Is THIS The Carbomb You Meant?
"Within the hour, an aircraft crashed on a helicopter landing pad near the Pentagon, a car bomb exploded outside the State Department, and the West
Wing of the White House was evacuated amid threats of terrorism. And another explosion rocked New York about an hour after the crash."
www.staugustine.com...
[06:42] how long ago did all of this styart ?
[06:42] lphabuck> confirmed bomb blew up at pentagon heliport
[06:44] alphabuck...where did you hear confirmed bomb at Pentagon?
[06:44] haronelle> Wender - right - Israelis can't simply complain about terrorist acts - they have to act to solve the underlying problem.
[06:44] juleee....near NY...I think
[06:44] KenBz, the behaviour of the US is hardly analogous to that of Israel
[06:44] pentagon being evacuated
[06:44] * CarlSwanson would hate to be one of the men on the roof of the White House, watching everyone else being evacuated
[06:44] *** Quits: juleee (QUIT: User exited )
[06:44] lphabuck> pixy...live video on messybc
[06:44] shooby, I don't mind being reprimanded, but at least try to impress me with the typing, too. Okey doke?
[06:44] PixyStix its on nbc
www.newsgarden.org...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-4-2004 @ 09:39 PM by AceOfBase
|
I also remember hearing that on my way to work.
Once I heard them say an airplane had flown into the building, I just assumed that's what had made the noise and explosion and they had just got it
wrong on the first report.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-4-2004 @ 09:44 PM by J0HNSmith
|
Originally posted by mrmulder
My mom claims she saw them lift airplane pieces out from the rubble on tv but I've never seen anything to back up her claims. 
Yeah man, your mom is part of the conspiracy to cover up... ummmm.... what exactly would the cover up be? I think wee should get your mom on here and
interrogate her for answers!!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-4-2004 @ 09:51 PM by Esoterica
|
I do remember hearing something about a car bomb. I also remember thinking to myself "They just crashed airplanes into buildings, why are they using
car bombs, those are like firecrackers compared to this?"
However, I also remember hearing about an explosion in London and the Capitol being smashed to bits. We were in my AP Gov class, oddly enough, and we
actually drew a map of where all the attacks were taking palce on the chalkboard. It was like a war room. I distinctly remember a classmate erasing
the Capitol Building on the map when it was later corrected.
That was a very tense time. People were going on anything they could get.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-4-2004 @ 09:59 AM by FiberOptik
|
Originally posted by pyxsul
I would see the tail as one of the weaker parts of the plane which probably burned up. Look around, there are pictures of plane tires in the wreckage
along with other little bits and pieces. If I find a link, I'll post it. 
Perhaps a little late to reply to this, but I'm newly registered.
I have to disagree with this statement. First off, are you saying that the entire tail section was burned up in the ensuing fire, but the tires did
not? Secondly, I've provided links that show that the tail section usually survives intact (or at least recognizable as the tail section):
www.planecrashinfo.com...
www.planecrashinfo.com...
www.planecrashinfo.com...
www.planecrashinfo.com...
www.planecrashinfo.com...
I'm not saying that I believe an airliner didn't hit the Pentagon, but just saying that there seems to be no debris of substance to be 100% certain.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |