It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes, you can go to space and find what are, in sight of the evidence, space-ships of extraterrestrials.
There is more evidence to show this than to show the opposite.
do some research.
Second, the fact that you have failed to debunk the theories encircling the 2012 date doesn't mean that someone else will fail. It only means that you don't have the knowledge that you presume you do.
the theories of 2012 don't come from a single book. I'm not going to explain it to you, at all. When you do the research necessary, you'll understand just from where the theories spring-up.
Three figures within the New Age, the artist and theorist José Argüelles, John Major Jenkins, and …. Terence McKenna, have publicized theories concerning the significance of the end of the cycle.
Although Argüelles states that his tools and calendar are clearly not a Mayan calendar, much criticism of it focuses on the fact that his works remain completely unsupported by any professional Mayanist scholar
The 'Galactic Alignment'…..was originally popularised by John Major Jenkins, and is now a integral part of many new age proposals of how 2012 might affect us.
The precise alignment of the solstice point with the Galactic equator was calculated to occur in 1998 (Jean Meeus, Mathematical Astronomy Morsels, 1997 - mentioned by Jenkins This date was further refined by Smelyakov to May 7 1998 Therefore, if the significance of 2012 is related to a precise intersecting of the Galactic Equator, whatever that significance would have meant would already have occurred.
Despite the publicity generated by the 2012 date, Susan Milbrath, curator of Latin American Art and Archaeology at the Florida Museum of Natural History, stated that "We [the archaeological community] have no record or knowledge that [the Maya] would think the world would come to an end" in 2012.
"For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle," says Sandra Noble, executive director of the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. in Crystal River, Florida. To render December 21, 2012, as a doomsday or moment of cosmic shifting, she says, is "a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in."
Originally posted by andre18
[edit on 16-7-2008 by andre18]
Originally posted by andre18
In that case in all seriousness, I prepose that everyone on 2012 will turn into vampires. Now according to you that can’t be debunked because we have to wait until 2012 to see, BS. A theory is a theory, no matter if it’s a prediction, the prediction has to be able to be proven or disproven otherwise it can’t be taken seriously.
Is there is any evidence to support the theories leading up the prediction? No, if I can’t time travel to the future and asses the event, then I can attempt to debunk the theories leading up to the prediction.
Eg: Nibiru theory suggests a planet is headed to earth that may either hit or pass by. Is there any evidence to prove it, no, so it is debunked? Yes, because the evidence for it is proven to be false. We don’t need to wait until 2012 to debunk the theory because we know there is no planet on its way. The evidence leading up the prediction has been debunked so the prediction itself is debunked.
The evidence to support the conspiracy theories leading up the prediction of 2012 are debunked because the evidence has been disproven.
There is no need to wait until 2012 to see if: a world wide ascension, higher uplifting of human consciousness, alien contact, end of the word scenario, apocalypse, seconding coming of Christ or Nibiru happens because the evidence leading up to the predictions have been debunked so the predictions themselves are debunked.
But thats where you are wrong Andre, there IS evidence that support the ancient sumerian texts.
I haven't seen you disprove a thing and don't see how you can. How can you explain hiroglyphics depicting our planets our moon all orbiting the Sun thousands of years before copernicus? All of them to scale? You don't see that as a scandalous hint strange given the time and technology for that period?
Name what has been debunked?
So the Sumerian tablets have been, somehow, dis-proven?
Originally posted by andre18
Nothing will happen in 2012, no aliens, no ascension, no higher level of consciousness...
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
Originally posted by andre18
Nothing will happen in 2012, no aliens, no ascension, no higher level of consciousness...
How can you possibly say that? Can you see the future?
I believe something will happen around then, but I won't state that it will, because I can't see the future.
Originally posted by andre18
Do your research…..OWNED
[edit on 16-7-2008 by andre18]
Why don’t you show what I should be researching exactly because all I found are theories upon theories with no actual evidence that anyone can prove or disprove.
Originally posted by andre18
The only link the Sumerians have with 2012 is Nibiru, the fact that it hasn’t been discovered should be enough for any sane person to acknowledge that it doesn’t exist…… If Nibiru doesn’t exist then the Sumerians have nothing to do with 2012. You debunk the planet you debunk the theory.
Nibiru is debunked!
(It’s been debunked I can’t remember how many years ago
I didn’t debunk Nibiru, it’s already been done)
[edit on 17-7-2008 by andre18]
You can't see gravity either andre so does that mean it doesn't exist?
Before we were even able to see a nebula did that mean nebula's didn't exist ?