Breaking UFO News! - Stephenville, Texas Radar Report

page: 16
223
<< 13  14  15    17 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 30 2008 @ 06:07 AM
link   
reply to post by BlasteR
 


thanks for your reply i think your all over this 30 yrs ago sitting on a porch swing with my grandpa he told me boy tell no lies and your life will be enriched of course ive tried to sneak a few white lies in there over the years but theyve some how made their way back to me in a bad way but the thousands of truths i have told were never heard from again hello fortworth joint reserve base are you listening try the truth this time




posted on Jul, 30 2008 @ 08:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by BlasteR
They thought this was going to go away with a lie.. But they were mistaken.


Hi BlasteR, thanks for your reply.
You are right about that, they where mistaken this time, but despite they where mistaken they still has behind the scenes total control over it in my opinion.
And not only in this case but so many others as well.
They still control the important BIG media so to speak and therefore the BIG majority of the people.
Because those people still think that this phenomenon is nothing more then misinterpretations or secret new military stuff, definitely not Aliens, because the military says for decades now that they don’t exist.
And those two are very powerful joker cards they use to keep it under wrap.
Look for instance how it really goes in the Larry King shows with this phenomenon, yes it is live, yes there are people/witnesses who may tell the story, but on the other hand, they [those who controls the show] has always one or more professional debunkers in the show and the BIG majority of the people still think that they are telling the truth.
But that is only my opinion of course; I really hope I am wrong.



posted on Jul, 31 2008 @ 12:21 AM
link   
The point goes beyond the existence of alien technology or not. What it points to as other posters said is the existence of a government within a government and US military doesn't have to answer legitimate queries from civilians. Who is in charge? What's worse is that Americans seem to think this is normal and that nobody can do anything about it!

[edit on 31-7-2008 by ManInAsia]



posted on Aug, 11 2008 @ 05:11 PM
link   
reply to post by ManInAsia
 


Can you elaborate on "Radar shifting"? I am not familiar with that term.

-rrr



posted on Aug, 16 2008 @ 11:46 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 10:40 AM
link   
nobody has posted this one yet i dont think, pretty amazing!
www.vimeo.com...



posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 11:23 AM
link   
earthquake.usgs.gov...

2 earthquakes (minor 3.0) in Dallas today. Not sure if this has anything to do with whats going on just south of there but its interesting. I'm 44 and I don't ever remember any quakes in Dallas. Could they be using HAARP to chase these things away? Could HAARP be whats causing these sightings? Lots of questions but not very many answers.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by aceace]



posted on Nov, 13 2008 @ 04:41 PM
link   
reply to post by ufo reality
 


Just NorthEast of Stephenville is a place where the original Super Collider was going to be built. All the land was bought and the project was in the planning stages when it was shut down. Could be something in that same area, that was reused.



posted on Jan, 4 2009 @ 10:23 PM
link   
seek radar data before and after 9:42 pm around this location: lat=32.2254617023, lon=-98.2009440076

object first seen (stationary) at above location at 9:42pm..
object last seen headed east approx 10 deg north at 9:44 pm..
object is atleast 650' lg and min 350' wide..
at an approx altitude 1500 ft..

KoomBahYa My Ass!!
Just Do it!! Seek the Data..!!



posted on Feb, 3 2009 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by aceace
earthquake.usgs.gov...

2 earthquakes (minor 3.0) in Dallas today. Not sure if this has anything to do with whats going on just south of there but its interesting. I'm 44 and I don't ever remember any quakes in Dallas. Could they be using HAARP to chase these things away? Could HAARP be whats causing these sightings? Lots of questions but not very many answers.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by aceace]


Using HAARP to target a 524ft craft is like using a demolition ball to crush a dust mite.

Wrong tool, wrong job, nearly impossible.

Does anyone know how I can get an official copy of the Larry King show? Has anyone done it before?



posted on Sep, 17 2009 @ 04:08 PM
link   
Why is there not one mention in this thread of it being the Stealth Blimp?

the stealth blimp



posted on Sep, 18 2009 @ 02:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by alexander_delta
Why is there not one mention in this thread of it being the Stealth Blimp?

the stealth blimp


Ricky Sorrells didn't describe what he saw as being triangular in shape and it took up the entire sky above him. Doubt we have a blimp that large.
ovnis-usa.com...

The Stephenville officer-x described it as being saucer shaped about approx 600 ft wide.
www.stephenvillelights.com...
www.stephenvillelights.com...



posted on Sep, 18 2009 @ 03:12 PM
link   
Recently taken UFO pics from Stephenville:

s45.photobucket.com...

s45.photobucket.com...

s45.photobucket.com...



posted on Sep, 18 2009 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by ufo reality
 


On the third picture it looks like another ufo in the lower left hand corner.

I've been wondering if they are still seeing them.

I guess the news media has been told to not cover this . It sure seems that way to me.



posted on Sep, 18 2009 @ 03:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by alexander_delta
Why is there not one mention in this thread of it being the Stealth Blimp?

the stealth blimp


Good point!

This case reminds me a lot of the Lebanon, Illinois case which is referenced in your source, and that also seemed to have characteristics of a stealth blimp. That object was also described as very large so I imagine the blimps can be made extremely large. In fact think about it for a minute. If you design a lighter than air airship, it's lift and payload capacity will be partly related to its size so if you want it to carry a large payload, it might need to be pretty big.

The fact that Lockheed holds a stealth blimp patent adds credibility to the idea.

I'm not sure what they saw IS the stealth blimp but if I were to list possibilities of what they saw, I think I have to put the stealth blimp very close to the top of the list, if not at the top.



posted on Sep, 18 2009 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by MagicaRose
reply to post by ufo reality
 


On the third picture it looks like another ufo in the lower left hand corner.

I've been wondering if they are still seeing them.

I guess the news media has been told to not cover this . It sure seems that way to me.


Yes, UFOs are still being seen in the Stephenville area. I'm friends with a key witness from the 2008 sightings. Don't know why the media isn't covering them.



posted on Sep, 18 2009 @ 03:28 PM
link   
reply to post by ufo reality
 


Could you ask your friend if anyone has more pictures of them?

If he/she does they could be posted on ATS and that would help get the word out that they are still seeing them.



posted on Sep, 19 2009 @ 12:13 PM
link   
After reading the MUFON report in its entirety, I wonder why nobody appears (as far as I can see) to place the following interpretation on the events.

The whole thing was a demonstration, planned, prepared and monitored by those same airforce departments who refused any useful information. I have no doubt that a large aircraft of some type overflew the area and everything the witnesses reported is true. However, I have some reservations about their ability to determine the true size of the craft. The MUFON report adheres to the visual estimates based on angular dimension, which is notoriously difficult to estimate. Very few people under these circumstances would know the difference between a degree and ten degrees. At least one witness had difficulty even understanding the concept, so the value of his statement was effectively dismissed. A slow flying 747 at 500 feet is visually gigantic, but as aircraft go, not particularly unusual.
And why no offensive action from the fighters? After all, any unidentified craft getting withing ten miles of the Bush residence would be attacked as a matter of course. This thing had an escort! The AWAC was there because of the security ramifications. Dubya was said to be not at home at the time. Maybe cos he was actually on board?
WG3



posted on Sep, 19 2009 @ 11:26 PM
link   
stealth (stlth)
n.
1. The act of moving, proceeding, or acting in a covert way.
2. The quality or characteristic of being furtive or covert.

Now call me picky but what apart of stealth does this sighting conform to? last time i checked the whole raison d'etre of stealth craft was to avoid detection, not fly, in plain sight, and set off every radar in the area with a return that suggests someone is flying a stadium through sovereign airspace?

Personally, if i was running a black op department and Lockheed announced they'd just spent dot suqillion dollars of developing a *stealth blimp* that lit up radars like Blackpool illuminations, it would be consigned to the big red file marked *FAIL*.



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 05:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by LAUGHING-CAT
I'm not sure if anybody has asked this question before, but with what we DO know about military aviation, why would any military need an aircraft of such immensity?
We can deliver death with the size A/C we already fly.
I think most of us know the answer.
It ain't ours.
Great thread s&f


Yes, great thread, i revisited ATS and the Stephenville case for more information and watched the Larry King CNN show once more. So, nothing more then, the military explanation of 10 F-16 doing night training in the area is the only official explanation?

laughing Cat, huge aircrafts can serve as troop transport and support logistics vehicles, they would be extremely useful in a war. I come to think of the Aurora project and the TR-3B.





new topics
top topics
 
223
<< 13  14  15    17 >>

log in

join