Are the British God's chosen people?

reply to post by Naya


1535 huge mass migration from the Netherlands towards Great Britain, from Great Britain to the Netherlands, was under the Synode of Dordrecht. somewhere around 1565 again the same switching of a huge group of religious flocks , the Brits and the Dutch [ talking the whities here ] are for a big part bloodrelated family. another white mix is the Dutch/Frisians especially with the Danish , this mixed group migrated to Great Britain as well.

I read somewere the English language came from the Frisians
around 500 AD.
Gazbom.

reply to post by Naya

God does not nor did he choose one group, those who believe they where dealing with god were fooled by some good old Alien; needing one group to believe in its godlike self so he could invest them with his genes thus them believing/fearing/obeying/worshipping this alien into the position he is now.
Yes he did, he has chosen 144,000 to join him in heaven!

Gazbom.

reply to post by Naya


Leuk!
en groetjes van
Gazbom!

En bedankt voor de thread, het was zeer interessant.

Gazbom.


[edit on 11-7-2008 by gazbom56]

Originally posted by Wotan
reply to post by candyfloss

 

Of course God is an Englishman, its undeniable. Whoever said otherwise. We cant have a bally foreigner being God can we? perish the thought.

Please. If god was an englighman it would have taken him 21 days to create the earth, and the local councill would still be trying to decide whether or not to allow him to add the moon. Not to mention once finished, the sun would go out everytime it rains and the earths electical field would be constantly on the fritz.

All these so called "Miracles" may be nothing more than coincidence, but theoretically, all of the attempts to invade, conquer, etc.. that were unsuccessful, (in my opinion of the laws of probability), have only established a national ego that has multiplied the pompous attitude of the Brits to the brink of all their heads experiencing simultaneous spontaneous combustion. Maybe the ratification of this treaty will remove their status as a nation, but it surely will promote additional pompousness and allow the Rothchilds to step one rung farther up the ladder of global control without the red tape of multinational acceptance.

As far as being God's chosen people, I can only assume that this may be a ruse set in God's master plan from the beginning to keep the Brits around long enough to eventually fall when the time he set arrives.

If this is the case, God probably rolls his eyes at the British every time he must rescue them because of their constant attempt to destroy themselves prior to the time ordained for this to happen.

Any further miracles would only support this theory at this juncture.

reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed

Were have you been? On the bottle by the look of your spelling,
might you be pissed may I ask?
And if so, fair play to you.

Gazbom.



[edit on 11-7-2008 by gazbom56]

[edit on 11-7-2008 by gazbom56]

Originally posted by gazbom56
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed

 

Were have you been? On the bottle by the look of your spelling,
might you be pissed may I ask?
And if so, fair play to you.

Gazbom.



[edit on 11-7-2008 by gazbom56]

[edit on 11-7-2008 by gazbom56]

Not yet, its only 5pm here.

reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed

Victoria (queen) (1819-1901), Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1837-1901) and Empress of India (1876-1901). Born Alexandrina Victoria on May 24, 1819, in Kensington Palace, London, Victoria was the daughter of Victoria Mary Louisa, daughter of the Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, and Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent, the fourth son of George III. She ascended the throne on June 20, 1837, on the death of her uncle, William IV, who had no legitimate children. At this stage she was an unknown figure, even by name, to most of her subjects. When she died on January 22, 1901, outliving the century, she was one of the best-known figures, by reputation as well as name, not only in the United Kingdom but also in a greatly expanded British Empire and in the world, including the United States. Her reign had been the longest in British history, and she had given her name to an age—the age of Victorian Britain.
Sure, including United States!

Gazbom.

Originally posted by gazbom56
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed

 

Victoria (queen) (1819-1901), Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1837-1901) and Empress of India (1876-1901). Born Alexandrina Victoria on May 24, 1819, in Kensington Palace, London, Victoria was the daughter of Victoria Mary Louisa, daughter of the Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, and Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent, the fourth son of George III. She ascended the throne on June 20, 1837, on the death of her uncle, William IV, who had no legitimate children. At this stage she was an unknown figure, even by name, to most of her subjects. When she died on January 22, 1901, outliving the century, she was one of the best-known figures, by reputation as well as name, not only in the United Kingdom but also in a greatly expanded British Empire and in the world, including the United States. Her reign had been the longest in British history, and she had given her name to an age—the age of Victorian Britain.
Sure, including United States!

Gazbom.

Really, at least in America we have the sense to keep those of us who practise inbreeding hidden away in the mountains. You lot give them palaces and titles.

reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed

And make hollywood movies about your hillbillies, men raping men!
Is that how you get it off over there?

Gazbom.

reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed


Batman ..lol some people start early !!lol

Missed your input ...been keeping an eye out on this thread..found some of your threads sometimes informative...but very amusing !!lol

Please keep up the entertainment!!!lol

reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed


Way to go!


FIRST TEST, Lord's, day two (close): England 593-8 dec v South Africa 7-0


By Jonathan Stevenson



Ian Bell celebrates reaching his eighth Test century on day two

Ian Bell struck a magnificent 199 as England made South Africa toil in the field on day two of the first Test.

England piled up 593-8 before declaring in the final session after Bell fell one short of a double century, when he was caught and bowled by Paul Harris.

Kevin Pietersen was earlier out for a superb 152 and Stuart Broad made his highest Test score of 76 as England punished the wayward visiting attack.

How can you debate on our level when you don't understand this!

Gazbom.

Luck will run out for them soon!!! In 1910 they attacked South Africa and got their asses kicked by Farmers 45000 brit soldiers died 4500 boer soldiers but what did they do when they saw they where losing ? Started killing innocent women and children 29000 of them!!
In this country there lived a prophet - Siener van Rensburg - he prophesied the whole war and the curse that would befall them!
Remember this was pridicted 1910 :
--Loss of all their colonies
--Blacks and indians flooding to the uk
--racial tenson leading to civil unrest
--Giving the east all the US weapon secrets and tactics because the are sissies and afraid of the east and a nuclear attack
--they will obviously be on the otherside of the next world war and the us and germany will destroy them


Everything this dude prophesied has come true !!

Originally posted by gazbom56
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed

 

Way to go!


FIRST TEST, Lord's, day two (close): England 593-8 dec v South Africa 7-0


By Jonathan Stevenson



Ian Bell celebrates reaching his eighth Test century on day two

Ian Bell struck a magnificent 199 as England made South Africa toil in the field on day two of the first Test.

England piled up 593-8 before declaring in the final session after Bell fell one short of a double century, when he was caught and bowled by Paul Harris.

Kevin Pietersen was earlier out for a superb 152 and Stuart Broad made his highest Test score of 76 as England punished the wayward visiting attack.

How can you debate on our level when you don't understand this!

Gazbom.

Please son, sports noone understands?
We invented midget tossing.
nuff said.

[edit on 7/12/2008 by Shazam The Unbowed]

reply to post by Anonymous ATS


I have read this so-called prophets work and as far as I can see it is all bull****, at best circumstantial and very biased against Gods Chosen Nation - GB. The man was nothing but a Nazi bigot and a Boer to boot.

If you really think Germany will rise again as a military player then you should be 'sectioned'. I suggest you read up on post-war Germanys Military prowess or lack of it i should say.

Like all prophets and their prophecies, it is very easy to make things seem the way you want them too after the fact. Nostrodamus has never been proven right yet. Where were the prophets on 9/10?

If we are going all esoteric then I will channel my spirit guide'the Earl of Rochester'(good friend to Charles the Second)

'Ladies,I am up for it.Let's have some good,solid debauchery and who on ATS would like a jolly good rodgering?Man servant ,bring me my wine!Oh yes and God Save the King'

Hope that helps.What did he say I was in a trance at the time.

reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed


Yes ,but it's just not cricket old chap is it?I do like it when the colonials get a bee in their bonnet .It's qiute amusing and entertaining.However ,the civilised world must pity them in their plight.Why are there no missionaries helping these poor devils with their many sorrows;poor command of the English language and spelling,uncomely appearance(particularly the ladies who sometimes appear to the be the results of some dreadful experiment that Mary Shelley and Byron himself would be hard pressed to dream up) a distinct lack of appreciation of the arts and a lacking in backbone and moral fibre.Lord Wellington would soon lick them into shape.Failing that ,a learned diarist such as Peyps should be dispatched immediatley to the Colonies so he can record the miasma of despair so other civilised cutures will recognise the pitfalls of theland of that is the Americas.

How can we not be proud?

Mel B's Crib

uk.youtube.com...

[edit on 12-7-2008 by Cantwara]

as regards genocides, the Americans did a fine job of disposing of north american Indians, battle of wounded knee springs to mind.

Originally posted by gazbom56
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed

 

Victoria (queen) (1819-1901), Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1837-1901) and Empress of India (1876-1901). Born Alexandrina Victoria on May 24, 1819, in Kensington Palace, London, Victoria was the daughter of Victoria Mary Louisa, daughter of the Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, and Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent, the fourth son of George III. She ascended the throne on June 20, 1837, on the death of her uncle, William IV, who had no legitimate children. At this stage she was an unknown figure, even by name, to most of her subjects. When she died on January 22, 1901, outliving the century, she was one of the best-known figures, by reputation as well as name, not only in the United Kingdom but also in a greatly expanded British Empire and in the world, including the United States. Her reign had been the longest in British history, and she had given her name to an age—the age of Victorian Britain.
Sure, including United States!

Gazbom.

thank you for starting this..

The fourth and final overturn began on Christ-mas Day in 1950 when God inspired and Christ assisted four Scottish Nationalists to remove the real Lia Fail / Stone of Destiny / Coronation Stone from Westminster Abbey for Him and replace it with the fake (Stone of Scone).

King George 6th knew of this prophecy in Ezekiel 21:27 concerning the British Throne - the Stone of Destiny - and the fourth and final overturn and was vexed and afraid that the loss (of the Coronation Stone in 1950) portended the end of his dynasty, as Ian R. Hamilton Q.C. states in his book "The Taking of the Stone of Destiny", Lochar 1991, page 139, "Forty years on" line 8:-

"Privately we learned that he (George 6th) had a superstitious fear that the loss portended the end of his dynasty."

George 6th must have known, as must his daughter Elizabeth, that the stone that was left at Arbroath Abbey on 11th April 1951 was a Scottish sandstone fake and that she was cursed by God and never really crowned. She must also have known the prophecy, as did her great, great grandmother Queen Victoria, who said that if Christ came to take the Throne, she would immediately step down and give it to its rightful owner, and everyone of them knew it down to George 6th. It is unthinkable that George 6th would not also have taught this to his children - that Christ would come one day and rightfully claim the British Throne, in fulfillment of prophecy.

Elizabeth 2 who is descended from the royal line of David from the tribe of Judah, was then fraudulently crowned on that fake stone in 1953, so in actual fact was never officially crowned queen of Britain in the eyes of God; as God Himself prevented her from being, by having the Stone taken from her.