Originally posted by MikeboydUS
I want to know what the OP thinks of the ONA, Dragon Rouge, and other "darker" sects of Satanism. Do you think they should not call themselves
Satanic? What about the Yezidis or the Luciferians?
Well, I have to admit it's a tough question since I have to claim a fair amount of ignorance on some of those subjects. I clearly don't know as
much about them as I would like and I will make it a goal of mine to research them further. I also make it a point to not comment on things I have
little knowledge of.
I believe it is fair enough to call one's self Satanic if indeed they worship Satan like the Spirituals do or if they follow the teaching of the
Church of Satan as the LaVeyens do, or I suppose if one were to follow an off shoot of the two afore mentioned systems.
I feel as though it would be detrimental to affiliate one's self and one's belief systems with a term that carries with it both a certain
connotation and a fairly concrete definition (in modern usage) if the term does not really apply.
As for the Yezidis I have this quote from Wiki:
In the Yazidi belief system, the world was created by a god, and the world is now in the care of a Heptad of seven Holy Beings, often known as
Angels or heft sirr (the Seven Mysteries). Preeminent among these is Melek Taus (Tawûsê Melek in Kurdish), the Peacock Angel. According to the
Encyclopedia of the Orient, "The reason for the Yazidis reputation of being devil worshipers, is connected to the other name of Melek Taus, Shaytan,
the same name the Koran has for Satan".[8] Furthermore, the Yazidi story regarding Malek Taus' rise to favor with God is almost identical to the
story of the jinn Iblis in Islam, except that Yazidis revere Malek Taus for refusing to submit to Adam, while Muslims believe that Iblis' refusal to
submit caused him to fall out of Grace with God, and to later become Satan himself.[9]
also
Yazidis believe that Melek Taus is not a source of evil or wickedness. They consider him to be the leader of the archangels, not a fallen angel,
and therefore comparable to the Christians' Lucifer,
I believe it would be inappropriate to call the Yazidis Satanists as they do not worship an evil or dark God in the same sense as a Spiritual Satanist
might. I feel that calling Yazidis Satanists may verge on an insult to their religion depending upon the person using the term.
It seems to me that Yazidis are closer to Dualist than Satanists. I believe there are other religions that believe in a higher Creator God and a
lower, almost Demi-God who is in charge of the Earthly realms. I do suppose it varies from group to group as to whether this Demi-God is indeed dark
and evil or not.
As for Luciferians I suppose it depends on what aspect of Lucifer they worship. Personally I like to make a clear distinction between Lucier and
Satan as Lucifer means "Light-bearer" and Satan means "Adversary" so in essence a Luciferian system would be different from a Satanic system.
Here's more from wiki on Luciferians:
Luciferianism is identified by some people as an auxiliary of Satanism, due to the popular identification of Lucifer with Satan. Some Luciferians
accept this identification or consider Lucifer as the light bearer aspect of Satan, and thus could properly be called Satanists. Others reject it,
arguing that Lucifer is a more positive ideal than Satan. They are inspired by the ancient myths of Egypt, Rome and Greece, Gnosticism and traditional
Western occultism.
So I suppose, when it comes to Luciferians, it really depends on what their personal or religious archetype of Lucifer is and whether or not they
believe him related to Satan.
As for the Dragon Rouge, from what I saw on Wiki there was little to point to them being specifically worshippers of Satan over other deities and it
seems too mystically oriented to really be tied with LeVayen Satanism.
Sorry for all the edits but I was doing a bit of that research I promised.
[edit on 3-7-2008 by Shadowflux]
[edit on 3-7-2008 by Shadowflux]
[edit on 3-7-2008 by Shadowflux]