It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by d60944
You forgot one:
2,768,361,562,83,950,386,656 BCE : Bilbo Baggins sets off to kill the dragon with the dwarves
Seriously - what is the point of this thread?
Originally posted by IvanZana
270,183 BC The gods arrive on Earth via the planet Nibiru.
[edit on 27-6-2008 by IvanZana]
Originally posted by rocksolidbrain
reply to post by merka
reply to post by damefool
Comon, you guys are trying to apply logic and brain on this thread ?
Laugh and move on ...
Originally posted by damefool
Originally posted by IvanZana
270,183 BC The gods arrive on Earth via the planet Nibiru.
[edit on 27-6-2008 by IvanZana]
I don't where you got your source from but the Peking man have been dated from around 500,000 years ago which is way before The Gods arrives???
Originally posted by merka
The timeline is a complete lie because there's no mention of Atlantis, wtf?
Originally posted by IvanZana
Another interesting thing is that the people of the old testement lived hundreds of years. Some of them over a thousand.
Their is an abundance of information that supports this chronology. Its obvious that some of the chronolgy is based on theory and speculation, afterall we are talking about 10,000+ years ago.
I understand that this thread will go over the heads of most pseudo-intellects.
If you dont agree with the thread, go to the alien threads. Most of you dont even know your daddie's history let alone whats presented here.
For you people who add and want to have a 'intelligent' discussion. Thank you, and your welcome.
Originally posted by BroonStone
So if I were to write a book on this subject with absolutely no evidence to back my claims would you buy it? Because that is what you have done, you bought and support claims and so called evidence that belongs in a fantasy novel! This is all speculation, there is no evidence to back any of this. So why argue and treat people as if they are subordinates with little or no intellect? I was willing to read your posts and take what you said as possible, but you have shown your true colors here and I will never dignify another of your posts with my "pseudo-intellect".
Originally posted by Hanslune
Okay I'm here - now lets see these facts, eh?
So that first date - what is the verifiable source for that?
CHAPTER SEVEN
PASSING TIME ON PLANET X
The Epic of Creation
Where did the gods come from? According to the Sumerians, the gods came to Earth from a planet called Nibiru. Their descriptions of that planet match precisely the specification of the so-called “Planet X”, which is currently being sought by modern astronomers within our own Solar System. This planet is believed to have an elliptical orbit that takes it into
the depths of space, well beyond the orbit of Pluto - hence it has not been seen in recent times.
The scientific evidence and ongoing search for planet X will be dealt with later in this chapter, but first we must review a mass of evidence that traces the history of that planet from the early days of the Solar System right up to the legendary Flood, which I will date
to 13,000 years ago.
Our quest for Nibiru/Planet X begins with an extraordinary source - a 4,000 year old Babylonian text known as the Enuma Elish. In 1876, George Smith of the British Museum published his translation of this sacred Babylonian epic, pieced together from broken clay tablets such as that shown in Figure 1.
Smith had already caused international headlines with his earlier translation of a Flood text which paralleled the Biblical tale. The Enuma Elish caused an equal stir, for it appeared to represent a creation myth that was far more detailed than the brief Biblical account of Genesis 1
d.scribd.com...
Arrival of the gods (Sitchin)443,000 BC (Alford)270,183 BC
Zecharia Sitchin dates the arrival of the gods to 443,000 BC, which he supports with a claim that they arrived in the Age of Pisces. According to my analysis, however, the precessional ages as we know them only began 13,000 years ago.
It is therefore invalid to count back beyond that time using precessional periods of 2,160 years. The gods may well have
arrived in an age of Pisces (the evidence is tenuous), but we cannot possibly date it. As can be seen above, my chronology gives a much more recent date for the creation of mankind, shortly after 184,000 years ago versus Sitchin’s 299,000 years ago.
Which date is more likely to be correct? As discussed in chapter 2, the question hinges on the appearance of the so-called archaic Home sapiens, which the experts believe must represent an earlier evolutionary step toward fully-fledged, anatomically modern Home sapiens. Since the latter is dated to around 200,000 years ago, the archaics, it is assumed, must have appeared around 300,000 years ago. The latter is a convenient figure which also matches the “accepted” date for the demise of Home erectus.
A cynic would suggest that the scientists have interpreted the data to match their preconceptions of a smooth evolutionary progression, and drawn their conclusions accordingly.
How reliable is the dating of the archaic specimens? As I pointed out in chapter 2, the accuracy of radiocarbon dating is limited to 40,000 years ago. There is not one reliable dating to suggest that the archaics preceded the moderns. Added to which, the archaic specimens represent such a small sample size that no-one is quite certain exactly what they are.
They combine features of modern man with other, more archaic features, but with considerable variability in the combination of archaic and modern features.-’ This can mean one of three things. Either this group had been evolving for a long time (and if so, where is the fossil evidence?), or they were the result of inter-breeding (genetically impossible?), or they represent unnatural genetic experiments by the gods, as indeed described in the ancient texts.