NIcon: 1. I don't think we can use the 2 collapses in the case your arguing as their times have large discrepancies between NIST time and
LDEO's which is being explained by the fall time for the debris.
NIcon, that's pure BS what they (NIST?) try to sell there. If you ever stood beside a pile-driver driving piles in the ground, for foundation
construction, you have felt the shocks through your soles.
So they want us to sell that the whole top impacting the rest of the building, and then progressively destructing that building, didn't send a huge
seismic signal into the underlaying bedrock?
That's a straight out fairytale, meant for the ignorant masses.
I hope you don't fall for it, how on earth could a progressive collapse not send signals, until 12 seconds later the first exterior panels hit the
ground? See the BBC camera man running while filming backwards.
The NIST theory of tower destruction is based on a progressive gravitational collapse. How could an exterior panel, dwarfing in mass compared to the
whole structure falling THROUGH itself like they said, be the first seismic signal, 12 seconds after collapse started?
Do you see their complete senseless lie?
It seems like you are just starting to investigate the day of 9-11, so it would be an eyeopener, if you visited one of the best history sites on the
It's constantly correcting their data, when new info emerges for a historic timeline of before, during and after 9-11:
The History Commons website is an experiment in open-content civic journalism. It provides a space for people to conduct grassroots-level
investigations on any issue, providing the public with a useful tool to conduct oversight of government and private sector entities. It is
collaborative and thus allows individuals to build upon the work of others. Each investigation is organized as a “project,” which is made up of at
least one timeline. You can contribute to a project by adding new events to the timeline associated with that project. All submissions are
peer-reviewed by other users before being published.
Then visit this link for a complete timeline of 9-11:
It is stocked to the neck with mainstream press article links, to build the timeline on. You can't say that they use biased sites.
Still, a worrying stance of corruption rises from this pile of official information, when all these decades of momentum leading to 9-11 and its later
repercussions for all individuals on earth become obvious.
Sorry for the time it will cost you, but it is definitely worthwhile, one of the most unbiased historical truth seeking sites around.
[edit on 3/9/08 by LaBTop]