Explosions at WTC 7.
Barry Jennings - 9/11 WTC7 Full Uncut Interview - 1 of 2:
Barry Jennings - 9/11 WTC7 Full Uncut Interview - 2 of 2:
WTC 7 Explosion on Audio (heard by firefighters)
Rescuers at payphone startled by secondary explosion.
Note that one of the rescuers is saying, "We got to get back, 7 is exploding":
"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."
White Doomsday plane over Washington on 9/11.
CNN Discusses Mysterious White Plane over W.D.C. on 9/11
Rare footage from the day of the Oklahoma City Bombing that reveals that there were 3 explosive devices planted INSIDE the building.
Pentagon PSYOPS propaganda programs.
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
For the past two years, U.S. military leaders have been using Iraqi media and other outlets in Baghdad to publicize Zarqawi's role in the
insurgency. The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.
Two slides from a briefing prepared for Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, describe a U.S. military propaganda campaign that was
intended to highlight the role of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian terrorist, in the Iraqi insurgency. By emphasizing his foreign origin, the
"psychological operations" effort sought to play on a perceived Iraqi dislike of foreigners and so split the insurgency.
WTC 7 FINAL REPORT?
As federal agency declares 'new phenomenon' downed WTC 7, activists cry foul:
I took out some of the more eloquent comments on the above article at RawStory.com, from their Comments” link on this article; they speak for
Well, last December, NIST said that the fires died down in 20 minutes in any given location in the building.
"At any given location the combustibles needed about 20 minutes to be consumed."
Do they now explain how such short-lived office fires could have caused ANY steel to weaken in ANY way? According to a Finnish engineering document, a
typical office fire can raise the temperature of fire-protected steel to a maximum of 200 degrees Celsius in 20 minutes' exposure.
It seems that a narrow Finnish wooden plank is more fire-resistant than massive WTC steel:
Wake up, America!
This final report has been “fixed” by ARA; take some time to find out what kind of research in what field exactly this firm does for the US DoD.
And what they get paid for it.
As we can see in their final WTC 7 reports, they had an A and a B scenario computed, and they inserted fire exposure times of beams, columns, trusses
and girders, of 4 and 5 hours long
…… Not 20 minutes as NIST stated all these past years.
I posted a photograph from late morning 9/11 (circa 11:30), which fact can be calculated from the shadows in the picture, and this photo was taken
just after most of the heavy dust from the North Tower had precipitated to the ground (which also delivers a fairly accurate time for this
You see a sun lit picture, with the South façade of WTC 7, and the west façade also, clearly having no fires burning in it, and no heavy smoke on
that side yet from WTC 5 and 6.
So much for debris invoked fires on the south façade of WTC 7.
Thermal expansion doesn't happen? For steel the coefficient is .000012; look it up.
The linear thermal expansion can only be defined for solids, and is common in engineering applications.
The thermal expansion coefficient is a
thermodynamic property of a substance.
It relates the change in temperature to the change in a material's linear dimensions. It is the fractional change in length per degree of temperature
Alpha = 1/L0 x deltaL/deltaT
where L0 is the original length, L the new length, and T the temperature.
The proposed maximum temperature reached in WTC 7 and used by NIST was 735° Celsius.
Calculate now how far the longest beams, when heated over their total length will have expanded, in centimeters.
In addition, contracted back to their original length again, after cooled down again to room temperature of 20° C.
Then look up the Cardington University experiment from the mid-nineties, where Scottish engineers heated a non-fireproofed steel building with a
raging fire for prolonged times, and only minor buckling occurred, no collapse, and NO breaking of welded and bolded connections!
Look up the “Tyndall experiment” in your old physics books. It shows thermal expansion and following contraction influenced by heating and
cooling, by breakage of a thin iron rod, stuck in a ring at the end of another thick iron rod, which ring’s inner end is shaped like a V.
This thick rod which is threaded at one end, with a nut on it is placed in a long “U” formed thick iron base, and the nut is fastened.
The thick rod is then heated with a Bunsen burner, and then the nut is fastened again, since the rod expanded; and cold water is poured over the hot
The thin rod will break by the contracting of the thick rod, with a loud crack.
This works only when you fasten the nut again…. And such external help to fixate one end was not available for the heating-up and subsequently
cooling-down of structural steel parts of WTC 7, they were part of a steel structure and had enough freedom to expand and contract again, moving
connection points up and down (columns) and left to right(beams and girders). No more than 15 cm, and then only in case the whole length of the steel
would have been exposed to that max. temperature of 735° C.
This risk is already known for hundreds of years, and is nothing new, and basic engineering practice in designing fire proving on steel, to protect a
structure for a standard time of endurance to fire.
The expansion and contraction would have been visible in displacement of the facades for no more than plus or minus 15 cm at floors with heated
trusses in them. But in most cases for much less displacements, since heating of a full length of steel, to the max temperature of 735° C will have
been impossible in practice. In that case we should have seen raging inferno’s on whole floors, lasting for hours.
And we did not see that, the fires progressed fairly fast from one room to the other, as we could see clearly in the video from the cascading fire and
breaking windows on the west façade, on the 9th floor.
And burned out in the preceding rooms also fairly fast.
There were also no diesel oil fed fires, then we would have seen the same pitch black smoke as in the diesel generator burning at the Pentagon.
VIEW THIS SHORT INTERVIEW
the FULL and UNCUT interview with Barry Jennings (Office of Emergency Management)
Barry was in WTC 7 on the morning of 9/11 and puts his account on the record.
He tells of EXPLOSIONS, DEAD BODIES, and a BLOWN OUT LOBBY.
Kindly let me explain what NIST is really saying:
George Washington at blogspot.com.
Now this is the scary part of all comments, this person hit the nail on the head:
For me, what is infinitely more scary than finding out that the Neocons attacked us on 9/11 is that some Americans can learn the truth and say
"So what ?". There is one in my department at work. I overheard him laughing at 'truthers' so I went over and clicked a few links with him. After
some evidence he got quiet. I asked him what he thought and his response was...
"At this point does it really matter?"
I think the mindset is "we are at war and nothing else matters". Nevermind that your "war" is an invasion followed by a potentially endless
occupation. Nevermind that this is all for corporate purposes rather than the defense of our Constitution and way of life. If Cheney held a press
conference and went into detail about how he planned and executed 9/11, the (fill in ATS banned word) I work with would still think Bush is a hero.
This is the most programmable society in history. They think what the TV tells them to think. The TV is their only source of entertainment and
reality. Centuries past, we had The Church dispensing myths, now we have television. What the TV says is real, IS real and anyone who doubts it is an
outcast, pariah, and blasphemer. This society does not warrant a Nazi SS, as it silences itself. Anyone who does not fall in line is ridiculed and
silenced by their fellow citizens.
This is a way for the engineers at NIST, who studied the failure of building seven while under incredible pressure from the false-flagging,
duplicitous neocons, to communicate that they were forced to conclude that building 7 fell from a "previously unknown force..."
REALLY? A PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN FORCE?
It is such an easily disprovable hypothesis it appears more like a signal for help and attention and begs others (professional, peer-reviewed
scholarly engineers) around the world to test and refute NIST's findings.
Logically, it makes sense. The engineers were not allowed to publish the facts of their original conclusion. (Hence, the 7 YEARS of Study of this One
Building, Building 7, omitted completely from the official 9-11 Report) Therefore, they prop up a theory that others in their field cannot ignore and
would not believe men of their stature would normally put forth.
20 years from now, these same engineers will proclaim, on their deathbeds or in their memoir’s, that "they were the hero's."
Let's see: JFK and Governor Connelly were both shot by the same 6.5mm bullet, which passed right through both their bodies (and the car seat, if
I recall), before being found, almost undamaged, on Connelly's ambulance gurney.
An incredible coincidence.
Flight 800 was brought down by a spark that occurred in the center fuel tank of the 747, something that had never happened before and has never
happened since, despite literally millions of 747 flight hours over about 40 years. Dozens of witnesses who saw a missile fly from the sea upward that
ended in a white flash (high explosives), not the yellow flash of a fuel explosion, must have been mistaken.
An incredible coincidence.
WTC Building 7 is brought down by limited structural damage and, in a new theory, those structural beams, which were buried in feet of concrete and
swathed in asbestos, expanded and failed due to office fires, although this has never happened before in thousands of fires in steel-framed
An incredible coincidence.
I am amazed that only the building WTC 7 collapsed, what about the adjacent buildings, they all stay intact! This point alone sufficed to refute
this ridiculous "new phenomenon"...
WTC 5 and 6 were totally engulfed in flames and those fires really raged for several hours, but they did not collapse. They were much lower, but
breaking of essential connections should have been far more commonplace in these buildings, but those parts of them which still stood after impact by
WTC 1 debris, stood still up, after WTC 7 debris also fell on them.
The fact is that suddenly the building started to descend pretty symmetrically at the average speed of 7 floors per second. This leaves about
0.15 seconds for the dropping AND destruction of each individual floor. All the resistance was suddenly gone.
NIST also states that there was no loud sound of explosion. What, then, about the *very* loud sound of an explosion that startles the first responders
towards the end of this video clip?
See George Washington’s blog post for some more WTC 7 explosion sounds, filmed on 9/11