Originally posted by Mad_Hatter
The article also says Iran has rejected the UNs proposal of six different nations helping them develop a civilian uranium enrichment program.
There are so many 'strings attached' it wouldn';t be worth it in Irans eyes..
there would be teams of nuclear workers crawling all over the country, and a good portion of these nuclear workers would be spies and intelligence
agents with just enough training and false papers to make them credible.
Also, i imagine that the 6 european nations which would be aiding in the nuclear fuel procurement program would demand payment in USD...which Iran is
busy divesting itself of.
Which in essence , keeps Irans' attempt at seperation from American hegemony a failed policy.
So, is it unreasonable for Iran to reject teams of nuclear specialists under UN direction (but most likely NATO members)
And requiring Iran to buy nuclear fuel in USD/EUros,
And being kept under the thumb of the WorldBank as the $ transfer agent so unreasonable??
my answer is No its not unreasonable at all...
Western coercern is what's at play here, with Iran being played as the bad-guy... (that's strategic 'diplomacy' ~ as a kind terminology~)