It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
If elected president, Senator John McCain would reserve the right to run his own warrantless wiretapping program against Americans, based on the theory that the president's wartime powers trump federal criminal statutes and court oversight, according to a statement released by his campaign Monday.
Originally posted by Equinox99
Why is this even news for you? Voting for McCain is like putting Bush for another term. The war in Iraq will continue, the war in Afghanistan will continue, and the war in Iran will soon happen regardless of who you pick.
Tam Dalyell, a Labour party deputy and the longest-serving House member, said: “A Jewish cabal have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy alliance with fundamentalist Christians… There is far too much Jewish influence in the United States.”
Source
"Should telecommunication companies receive immunity for allowing the government to conduct past warrantless wiretaps?"
Not Clearly Pro or Con: "The struggle against Islamic fundamentalism is the transcendent foreign-policy challenge of our time. I am committed to winning this battle, enhancing the stature of the United States as beacon of global hope, and to preserving the personal, economic, and political freedoms that are the proud legacy of the great sacrifices of our fathers.
Every effort in this struggle and other efforts must be done according to American principles and the rule of law. When companies provide private records of Americans to the government without proper legal subpoena, warrants, or other legal orders, their heart may be in the right place, but their actions undermine our respect for the law.
I am also a strong supporter of protecting the privacy of Americans. The issues raised by S 2248, and the events and actions by all parties that the preceded it, reach to the core of our principles. They merit careful and deliberate consideration, fact-finding, and exploration of options. That process should be allowed to proceed before drawing conclusions that may prove to be premature.
If retroactive immunity passes, it should be done with explicit statements that this is not a blessing, there should be oversight hearings to understand what happened, and Congress should include provisions that ensure that Americans' private records will not be dealt with like that again."
Senator John McCain, who has long distanced himself from the Bush administration on legal issues involving the war on terrorism, this week aligned himself with conservative supporters of the White House on key votes related to the interrogation of prisoners and warrantless surveillance.
The vote was on an amendment to deny AT&T and other telecommunications companies legal immunity if they are proven in court to have violated federal privacy law by opening their networks to the National Security Agency.
Obama voted for the amendment. That's a vote for electronic privacy and for the rule of law. It means that AT&T and any other companies that may have violated the law would be held accountable for any illegal actions they committed. Conversely, if AT&T, et al, violated no laws, its lawyers have nothing to worry about.
McCain opposed the amendment. This is a flip-flop from his earlier statement to us that we published as part of our News.com voter's guide earlier this year.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)
Sen. John McCain McCain, the expected GOP nominee, has expressed concerns about the legality of the wiretapping program in the past, but in 2007 he did not vote on the bill. More recently, McCain has stood with Republican leaders in support of the overall bill and the immunity provision.
Unlike Clinton and Obama, McCain was present and voted for the FISA bill in February. He has also stepped up his rhetoric around the importance of the surveillance program. After the House of Representatives failed to renew the government surveillance program, McCain joined President Bush in calling the move "disgraceful."
Originally posted by Equinox99
Call me anti-semitic but the Jewish lobbyists are destroying your country.
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Even with all of these links posted for videos & articles that show how much McCain likes Bush...I seem to notice that there's no links to show how much Bush likes McCain enough to help
how much Bush likes McCain enough to help
Originally posted by RRconservative
If any American is talking to terrorists, and planning attacks against Americans, and our government sits back and does nothing to prevent this. I would call for that Presidents impeachment.
Originally posted by RRconservative
This is nothing more than collecting battlefied intelligence. Since 9/11/01 America is a battlefied. No one will ever know how many attacks have been prevented because of these measures. How can you agree with not monitoring potential terrorists plots. How easy do you want the terrorists to have it?
Originally posted by RRconservative
We haven't been attacked since 9/11/01 yet there are people out there who want to take away a huge reason for that. It makes no sense.
McInsane = McSAME = McBush