It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wytworm
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by dalan.
I am an eye witness. I have never seen one. Do you dispute my eye witness testimony? Shall we count the eye witnesses on either side?
I'm an eye witness to. I've never seen any cosmic strings, and I think noone ever has. Jeah, that's it, String theory must be wrong.
[edit on 28/5/08 by enigmania]
So you concede the absurdity of 'eye-witness' testimony? Great! We finally have common ground.
He's speaks of science in a blasphemous way and also contradicted himself through self-bias.
He's acting like an egotist or an elitest.
Anyone who understands reality will tell you that the mind is the controller of humanity (and hence, reality as we know it) and the scientific method that ignores that, as if some certain individuals can deny this "objective" weakness, is a scientific method that does not apply to reality.
You're arguing that we should look at everything to understand a truth, with science as a subset.
He is arguing that the scientific method is the only way.
Originally posted by wytworm
Yes they are non-verbal in that they do not use the spoken word. They are except for 3 or 4 species non vocal, if by that you mean making noises that emanate from their mouths. They communicate through non-verbal means, yes, but it isn't telepathy. They communicate using body language: pushups, change of skin color, head bobbing, dewlap extension, posture changes, movement (strutting, for example) or making themselves look tall or flattened out.
I have seen plenty of humans exhibiting the same behavior as you describe above. I have never seen any of those wearing jeans made from a reptile. If you mean genes, I would say you have a good start on a hypothesis. Go run your studies and let us know what you find out.
Originally posted by 1234567
Remember - The LACK of evidence does not prove seomthing does not exist, only that NO evidence has yet been found to support the idea.
You need to remember that so far there is NO evidence to prove they DONT exists either, so in reality your argument is fundamantalyl flawed.
However there is a great deal of paintings, sculptures of no human beings dating back to pre Egyptians. Now, why would the acients be creating non human art ? We will probably never know the answer.
When people come out and say this is a FACT - Something exists or does not exists, they are basing their reasoning on their own assumptions. Have you travelled across the milkyway galaxy ? Or the universe ? If NO, then please refrain from making statements like this, because we are such a young species, we must open our minds to the fact that life exists throughout teh universe.
Need proof ? What about GOD - Need proof to believe in Jesus ? There is none, but millions believe it!
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by 1234567
the evidence, no matter how insignificant to some, is there.