It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dalan.
If you take into account all of our ancient myths and legends they paint quite the image.
And you must remember that even the "scholars" are forming they're assumptions about ancient mythology on biases.
Originally posted by dalan.
reply to post by wytworm
And as far as reptilians goes, your lack of not seeing one doesn not make you an eyewitness. Quite the opposite actually.
Originally posted by sarcastic
Seems to me when we completely unravel and decode DNA we'll understand the genes and abilities that are common to some humans and reptiles.
Until that work is done we are all just still guessing.
The R-complex is named for the most advanced part of the brain higher mammals share with reptiles. It is responsible for rage[1], xenophobia[1], and basic survival fight-or-flight responses[1]. Often, the R-Complex can override the more rational function of the brain and result in unpredictable, primitive behavior in even the most sentient of creatures, humans included. A well developed and healthy neo-cortex can monitor R-Complex activity in sentient beings. The Reptilian complex is the most ancient part of a very successful brain scheme, evolutionarily speaking.
Originally posted by sarcastic
Seems to me when we completely unravel and decode DNA we'll understand the genes and abilities that are common to some humans and reptiles.
Until that work is done we are all just still guessing.
The R-complex is named for the most advanced part of the brain higher mammals share with reptiles. It is responsible for rage[1], xenophobia[1], and basic survival fight-or-flight responses[1]. Often, the R-Complex can override the more rational function of the brain and result in unpredictable, primitive behavior in even the most sentient of creatures, humans included. A well developed and healthy neo-cortex can monitor R-Complex activity in sentient beings. The Reptilian complex is the most ancient part of a very successful brain scheme, evolutionarily speaking.
I am an eye witness. I have never seen one. Do you dispute my eye witness testimony? Shall we count the eye witnesses on either side?
String theorists have not yet completely described these theories, nor have they determined if these theories relate to the physical universe or how.[1] The logical coherence of the approach, however, and the fact that string theory can include all older theories of physics, have led many physicists to believe that such a connection is possible. In particular, string theory is the first candidate theory of everything, a way to describe all the known natural forces (gravitational, electromagnetic, weak and strong) and matter (quarks and leptons) in a mathematically complete system. On the other hand, many detractors criticise string theory because it has not yet provided experimentally testable predictions.
Seek your therapist's advice on feelings of persecution. That is wholly your invention and gets no traction from me.
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by dalan.
I am an eye witness. I have never seen one. Do you dispute my eye witness testimony? Shall we count the eye witnesses on either side?
I'm an eye witness to. I've never seen any cosmic strings, and I think noone ever has. Jeah, that's it, String theory must be wrong.
[edit on 28/5/08 by enigmania]
Originally posted by sarcastic
Reptiles are non-verbal and practically non-vocal yet they form mating groups therefore they communicate.
I think humans who are very good at non-verbal communication and maybe even telepathic must have some reptile jeans.
At its most basic, the artifacts found are cleaned, catalogued and compared to published collections, in order to classify them typologically and to identify other sites with similar artifact assemblages. However, a much more comprehensive range of analytical techniques are available through archaeological science, meaning that artifacts can be dated and their compositions examined. The bones, plants and pollen collected from a site can all be analyzed (using the techniques of zooarchaeology, paleoethnobotany, and palynology), while any texts can usually be deciphered.
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by wytworm
[more
I concede the absurdity of your eye witness statement. The fact that you think that if you or others, haven't seen something, it doesn't exist, shows your closed mindedness and your insult to this site's motto, topped of with your spin tactics.
You have missed the point. It was a device to illustrate the untenability of your example. Apparently unsuccessful.
I am an eye witness. I have never seen one. Do you dispute my eye witness testimony? Shall we count the eye witnesses on either side?
All this to illustrate that to equate historic evidence with scientific evidence is problematic at best, and outright misleading at worst as it dresses a pauper in kingly robes. That is to say, it tries to apply the credibility inherent in the discipline of the scientific method incorrectly to the subjectively interpreted historic records.
I'm not equating scientific or historic evidence, I'm equating theories based on scientific and historic evidence.
Perhaps you can elaborate on the spin part. Don't see it.
I am an eye witness. I have never seen one. Do you dispute my eye witness testimony? Shall we count the eye witnesses on either side?
Originally posted by wytworm
reply to post by enigmania
I'm not equating scientific or historic evidence, I'm equating theories based on scientific and historic evidence.
You are. Your reply is indicative of fundamental lak of understanding of history, science, or evidence.
-or-
of intellectual dishonesty