This topic is in the ATS Skunk Works discussion forum.  (rss)


Reptillians - There is NOTHING to prove they exist


<<  15    16    17    18    19  >>



reply posted on 29-5-2008 @ 02:42 PM by Tim Winckler


reply to post by dalan.



Sorry but I have proven it beyond a shadow of a doubt!
I found their Roots so to speak! All historical with an archeologist making the find!
since there is no longer a question of existence it is time to make plans for our wood be rulers demise or conversion to much better global neighbors. Our existence with the lizards is symbiotic now, one cannot exist without the other but no longer can things stay the same! No longer is there any reason to keep this secret, it just doesn't matter anymore. Hear Credo Mutwa's testimony on google or just google his name. He and Arizona Wilder confirm that the Lizards like the Aryan looking people because they are the best food for their fix and a higher emotional level..
They get a kick out of torturing them for months to get as much adrenalchrine in the blood before devouring them. They want to replace all the rest of us with their favorite food.
what a kick in the ass for the Nazis and Aryan types!

Just Google my name, I am everywhere, remember the c in my name.

Read and be amazed!




[edit: exceedingly large nested quote removed, replaced with "Reply To"]
Quoting - Please review this link

[edit on 29-5-2008 by 12m8keall2c]

[edit on 29-5-2008 by Tim Winckler]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-5-2008 @ 05:48 AM by enigmania


reply to post by Tim Winckler



Well I googled your name, with a C, and i get nothing but non-existing pages and vague sites, but nothing that has anything to do with what you said, or with this thread.

So what's that about? Spam?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-5-2008 @ 08:10 AM by q_ball


reply to post by Tim Winckler



Got Boast?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-5-2008 @ 01:36 AM by Tim Winckler











reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-5-2008 @ 04:37 AM by enigmania


reply to post by Tim Winckler



Your attitude says enough about you, and I bet it is no coincedence that the few internet pages that link to your name are fllagged for removal. I only saw one post of you on a forum where you registered two days ago, just like on this site.
Again, with the attitude.

You are allowed to post links and movies here on this site, so if you have anything of substance to say, please do so.

If not, well, be gone.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-5-2008 @ 06:55 AM by q_ball


reply to post by enigmania



for once we agree on some thing



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-5-2008 @ 10:43 AM by Anonymous ATS





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-6-2008 @ 05:13 AM by Anonymous ATS


OK, but if you take this as a "proof" that they don't exist, you may be in for a big mistake...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-6-2008 @ 05:23 AM by Straight Razor


I think I have finally figure out where all this stuff comes from: If it can be imagined it must be so...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-6-2008 @ 06:53 AM by q_ball


Basically this argument between reptilian supporters and non reptilian supporters sits like this


Skeptics - Show us proof please?

Believers - There is no proof, if you can imagine it, it an exist! The ancient Egyptians did and other historical tribes etc etc

Skeptics - ok, so i guess harry potter is real too?

Believers - well religion doesn't have any real proof?

Skeptics - other then most the worlds populations believing in a God....

Believers - They exist ok, because we believe in them?

Skeptics - Show us proof?

Believers - no.


As you can see, the progress is minimal. Wasnt meant to offend, just a make a point. There is NO evidence at all. No hoaxed evidence, nothing. Dont talk about morphing videos or ancient artifacts (we all know they are symbolic and metaphorical in meaning, not literal). WE believe in UFO's but not reptilians, why? because more people can show us evidence of a UFO with valid footage. Yet reptilians only exist in our imaginations??


[edit on 3-6-2008 by q_ball]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 10:45 AM by wytworm


reply to post by q_ball



This reminds me of the Bugs Bunny where Daffy Duck is tricked into continuously getting shot by Fudd:

Watch 59 seconds in

In the middle you assign Skeptics a reciprocal argument. What 'skeptic' is arguing that populations believing in God constitutes proof of god? This is argument ad populi and is antithetical to a skeptic.

Your follow up to it attempting to conflate an assumed credibility (again ad populi) for UFO's and belief in reptilians. This is problematic as it relies on a 'Tu quoque' argument, that is to say, ours is true because theirs is true. It only works insofar as you restrict your audience to UFO believers who do not posses an understanding of critical thinking...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 10:55 AM by q_ball


reply to post by wytworm



yes, but...


is there solid proof of reptilians? putting religion aside??
we can show ufo footage, we have govt documents...

but there is nothing on reptilians.....other then some statues...its also a pyshical impossibility to shape shift..



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 11:02 AM by wytworm


reply to post by q_ball



So video footage constitutes solid proof? They both sound very shaky to me.



[edit on 6-6-2008 by wytworm]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 08:48 PM by q_ball


reply to post by wytworm



how do i put this now about the UFO thing every one keeps on saying that how i could oh so blindly believe in and not reptillian...

Lets break down UFO...


Unidentified Flying Object..


Unidentified..

unidentified

adjective
1. not yet identified; "an unidentified species"; "an unidentified witness"
2. being or having an unknown or unnamed source; "a poem by an unknown author"; "corporations responsible to nameless owners"; "an unnamed donor" [syn: nameless]

Flying

1. making flight or passing through the air; that flies: a flying insect; an unidentified flying object.
2. floating, fluttering, waving, hanging, or moving freely in the air: flying banners; flying hair.
3. extending through the air.
4. moving swiftly.
5. made while moving swiftly: a flying leap.
6. very hasty or brief; fleeting or transitory: a flying visit; a flying remark.
7. designed or organized for swift movement or action.
8. fleeing, running away, or taking flight: They pursued the flying enemy.
9. Nautical. (of a sail) having none of its edges fastened to spars or stays.
–noun
10. the act of moving through the air on wings; flight.
–adverb
11. Nautical. without being fastened to a yard, stay, or the like: a sail set flying.

Object...

1. anything that is visible or tangible and is relatively stable in form.
2. a thing, person, or matter to which thought or action is directed: an object of medical investigation.
3. the end toward which effort or action is directed; goal; purpose: Profit is the object of business.
4. a person or thing with reference to the impression made on the mind or the feeling or emotion elicited in an observer: an object of curiosity and pity.
5. anything that may be apprehended intellectually: objects of thought.
6. Optics. the thing of which a lens or mirror forms an image.
7. Grammar. (in many languages, as English) a noun, noun phrase, or noun substitute representing by its syntactical position either the goal of the action of a verb or the goal of a preposition in a prepositional phrase, as ball in John hit the ball, Venice in He came to Venice, coin and her in He gave her a coin. Compare direct object, indirect object.
8. Computers. any item that can be individually selected or manipulated, as a picture, data file, or piece of text.
9. Metaphysics. something toward which a cognitive act is directed.
–verb (used without object)
10. to offer a reason or argument in opposition.
11. to express or feel disapproval, dislike, or distaste; be averse.
12. to refuse or attempt to refuse to permit some action, speech, etc.
–verb (used with object)
13. to state, claim, or cite in opposition; put forward in objection: Some persons objected that the proposed import duty would harm world trade.
14. Archaic. to bring forward or adduce in opposition.

There are government files that even report UFO's, pilots, and thousands upon thousands of civilians sightings.


How come your post never mentioned this?

Are you ignoring the fact that the UFO phenomena has made its way to the government? Maybe even began with then?


As for Aliens or whats inside the UFOs, well if i or we or they knew that well they would no longer be UFO's now would they?????




[edit on 6-6-2008 by q_ball]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-6-2008 @ 05:35 AM by wytworm


reply to post by q_ball



I don't think you are saying anything new there, just saying it longer with BOLD text.

Don't get me wrong, I really am not interested in the UFO vs reptilian argument one way or the other except that it was being expressed weakly due to the points I already responded with.

If you were to structure it differently you might have a more persuasive argument.

As for the second post, do you really think dictionary definitions for each letter are an effective way of making a point?

1) Post a link if you think a word is too hard for someone, don't chew up space like that.

2) This type of argument seems more geared to inciting flame wars as you are defining in great detail where there is already understanding. If this wasn't the intention, then please explain what the intention was.

3) It does nothing to further your point. As I said before, just more detail saying the same thing with creative font effects.

4) Why not just say: UFO's have been more studied and we still don't know whats going on. How can something like Reptilians be presumed to have more acceptance without some similar effort?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-6-2008 @ 07:35 AM by q_ball


reply to post by wytworm



Yes, duly noted. However, I and other skeptics are still yet to see any convincing evidence and thats now become the point...

[edit on 7-6-2008 by q_ball]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-6-2008 @ 07:42 AM by cbass



Originally posted by q_ball
Hi All,

Just Posting to say that there is NO proof that reptillians exist other then mere speculation and imagination. We have all seen UFO footage that make it credible, but that whole 'look at the eyes' videos is just bogus. It seems that reptillian believers are basing on nothing but imagination show me solid proof...


Hey all, just posting this to say there is no proof thathe OP exists. I have never seen a single picture and even if one were produced I'm sure it would be photoshopped. Unless he can provide proof of his existance I will assume that this is another Gov't disinfo campaign!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  15    16    17    18    19  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.173 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread