I'm pretty surprised that this dropped off the top 100 so fast.

I guess no one wants to discuss something like this.

Personally, i'd say your source is pretty inconclusive - an audio dialogue is never to be trusted 100%, it's far too easy to imitate a person's voice, especially with today's technological ability.

Plus, there is the fact that Osama has had links with the CIA in the past, so i wouldn't be surprised if it turned out one day (perhaps when the CIA has finally been burned to ashes under the fires of the law - i can wish, can't i?) it turned out he's actually their henchman.


I do, however, have some belief in that the attack was carried out by extremists though, but whether or not those extremists were carrying out the attack in a completely sound state of mind is questionable.

I'm saying that they were brainwashed, if you don't get my meaning.

And of course, it is the person doing the brainwashing who is ultimately responsible, and as such it is his intentions which should be questioned.

I do understand your point - i could probably counter-argue all day about this if i had a mind to.

I'm not arguing a position here. I'm actually curious how this fits into the bigger picture.

Did the CIA put out this audio?

Is there no real Bin laden?

Is this all just part of the conspiracy?

Plus, don't get mad at me for posting a genuine question. This is all over the news services.

I'd really like to know how news like this is viewed.

Thanks

I don't see why al Qaeda would care? Isn't it their objective to undermine democracy?

Wouldn't getting the American people to distrust their government and think that they carried out the attacks be a giant "Mission Accomplished" sign for OBL?

I think what is so annoying about this is that they REALLY THINK people are going to buy this..

Does anyone else find it a total insult to our intelligence?

News like this is viewed in as many ways as there are ways to view a peice of art.

All the news people do is put the information out there, and they don't particularly give a damn if people think they're valuing one piece too highly or too lowly.

In all honesty though, i think they could've added a bit about how an audio dialogue is supposed to be questionable - their aversion to this seems... well.... Questionable.

Saying "The audio message could not be verified as authentic" doesn't really amount to much more than saying "We're not sure about this, but we've made an article about it anyway because we think it might be true!".

What happened to the good old days of journalism where people would only make articles about stuff they knew was the truth?

Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant


What happened to the good old days of journalism where people would only make articles about stuff they knew was the truth?

Not much profit in the truth....

You know.. I have doubted all my life that the 'voted politicians' every really ran anything at all..

But this is just so retarded it could have come from GWB himself.

More blatant propaganda from Al CIAda IMO...These guys have been desperate as of late to keep the fear-mongering (and in turn these profiteering wars) going.

False Flag up next...

Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
And now all these mysterious tapes surface out of the woodwork all very low quality of course, all from anonymous sources..

Kinda like UFO hoaxers you mean?

Amazing how a guy who has/had all the resources/finances to plan out such a high scale operation can't seem to get his hands on a fairly decent quality videocam.

All that's missing is the zooming in and out to obscure the 'target'.