It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Atheists should logically be completely opportunistic and self-serving without any regard for mores or morals, i.e. sociopaths. For an Atheist to be moral at all makes no sense whatsoever. Hence a well-behaved Atheist is mentally ill.
Originally posted by passenger
I don’t know that I would go so far as to claim that Atheists are mentally ill. Most of the Atheists I know are seemingly more intelligent and rational than the average person. That being said, I also find it a dichotomy because Atheism is essentially an irrational viewpoint at it’s core; which is one of the complaints Atheists generally lodge against religious beliefs. If one equates irrationality with mental illness then I suppose I can see the basis for the argument presented.
Originally posted by passenger
The reason being is that if one subscribes to the idea of Atheism as the truth then there is no rational reason to behave.
Originally posted by melatonin
[Such an amazing insight, passenger. I wonder if anyone has thought about humans having some intrinsic drive to behave morally, being social beings and all that jazz.
Could be a whole new research field, lots of articles, and publishable academic books studying that sort of thing.
Originally posted by passenger
Originally posted by melatonin
[Such an amazing insight, passenger. I wonder if anyone has thought about humans having some intrinsic drive to behave morally, being social beings and all that jazz.
Could be a whole new research field, lots of articles, and publishable academic books studying that sort of thing.
I was hoping for this sort of reply.
Yes, I am aware of the various articles, etc. that deal with the various aspects of human social co-dependence and inherent drive to be accepted. I am also aware that bees, ants and other sundry beasts also follow arbitrary “rules” that their society sets for them. Worker bees will work themselves to death for the queen and soldier ants will sacrifice themselves as bait to defend the colony. That does not make those actions rational or an intelligent choice; it simply means they are instinctual.
So what you are saying is, that by following the dictates of your genes in being a social creature, you are acting as rationally and intelligently as a bee. They behave as bees because they have to, no matter how self-destructive the course of action is. Are you saying you follow the same behavior patterns, even when you have a conscious choice? To what end? How is that rational? What ultimate difference does it make if you act in a “good” or “bad” manner? From an Atheistic viewpoint the answer must be no difference at all.
Therefore any behavior of an Atheist, counter to their own desire, is intellectually dishonest at best and cowardly at worst.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
You are making the very naive mistake of crossing morality and religion again. Read my previous post. The ability to judge and make the choice between good and bad is not a matter of a god. It is a matter of critical thinking.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
To suggest that a story and a make believe super hero are the only thing between society and chaos is hilarious.
Originally posted by passenger
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
You are making the very naive mistake of crossing morality and religion again. Read my previous post. The ability to judge and make the choice between good and bad is not a matter of a god. It is a matter of critical thinking.
Agree and disagree. I would submit that religion and morality are intertwined because of the potentially self-destructive capability of the human mind’s capacity for rational and independent thought. Religion, and by extension morality, is a meme that is constructed to prevent a fatal flaw in human consciousness: self-awareness. Bees and ants don’t have to struggle with this problem, humans do. Now, when self-awareness started to emerge in humans there must have been a conflict between an instinct for communal benefit and desire for self-gratification. There still is today. The meme of religion is constructed to prevent humans from looking around the hive and saying: “Why the hell should I do this?” But if we take it as a given that Atheism is true, then consciously submitting to rules and regulations counter to ones own individual desires is duplicitous.
Granted, there are circumstances when one must obey. But given a lack of supervision or potential blame there is no reason not to act accordingly to one’s own desire. That’s one of the reasons religious types don’t like Atheists: they can’t fathom why an Atheist would behave when no one is watching. I would query the same.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
To suggest that a story and a make believe super hero are the only thing between society and chaos is hilarious.
Yes. I agree wholeheartedly. But who ever said that I believed in a guy that made fish magically appear and would return to save the world? Or did you mean Batman? I do believe he can save us all…
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Well, consider that the questions of morality could very easily be CAUSED by the religious indoctrination of generation upon generation of humans.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Throw in the fact taht MOST of the most heinous crimes in this world are perpetrated in the name of one religion or another, and I dont see how this holds any water whatsoever.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Also, it was an obligatory statement, not an accusation of what you believe.
Originally posted by passenger
blah blah
Originally posted by passenger
Atheism seems to imply that the whims of an individual are completely temporal and therefore, logically, meaningless. Therefore, morality has no meaning and thus there is no need to be “good”. Doing “good” is thus, ultimately, inconsequential.
Originally posted by passenger
Agreed. That is a tricky one. But I believe that ties in with my argument: Religion as a necessary meme to combat the influence of anti-social tendencies in an independent and self-centered awareness. Again, the human mind has the capacity to say to itself: “I am more important than anyone else.” The meme of religion acts as a counter to this and therefore protects society from disintegration. I cannot see why Atheism is beneficial in this sense. Atheism seems to imply that the whims of an individual are completely temporal and therefore, logically, meaningless. Therefore, morality has no meaning and thus there is no need to be “good”. Doing “good” is thus, ultimately, inconsequential.
Disagree - partially. Were the Romans motivated by religious fervor in conquering? Was Genghis Khan? Were Hitler and Stalin? This is a very debatable issue. I wouldn’t absolve religion of causing great strife but I wouldn’t lay the blame for “most” of the crimes of humanity at it’s door either.
No harm there. Truthfully, sometimes I’m not even sure what I do believe. I admit that I am somewhat sensitive to statements of this type. It’s difficult because I often use the tactic of playing “Devil’s Advocate” to understand and explore my own opinions and beliefs. When someone immediately dismisses me as a zealot or heretic in order to belittle my arguments it can be disheartening. I understand that you were making the statement in a general sense and I actually agree with the sentiment you presented.