It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by philosopherrose
I have no opinion other than to state that maybe people shouldn't cast stones (the person in the video of course, not the OP)..
Originally posted by melatonin
You have little insight into an atheistic viewpoint, you are just projecting how you think you don't have internalised moral mechanisms. You just follow a bunch of written rules like a drone, and without the rules you think you would be a sociopath.
Indeed, I do accept that an ABC guide for not acting like a social moron might be useful for some.
However, I use my inherent ability for empathy, altruism, moral sentiment, and reason to guide my behaviour.
[edit on 14-8-2008 by melatonin]
Originally posted by passenger
This reinforces my previous points. Thank you for agreeing. Inherent ability for “empathy” and “altruism”? That means you are mindlessly following instinctual influences and not using your capacity for independent thought.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
First off, I have to say it's great to have a debate on here without being called a troll or it turning personal. props for that.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
I dont think Atheism is necessarily beneficial in terms of moral high ground. Most the atheists I know, though, are very compassionate people. Most have a sense of doing good, because of the feeling they get by doing so. So, I guess maybe it comes down to each individual, when speaking of what makes them do good or bad things.
[edit on 8/14/2008 by cautiouslypessimistic]
Originally posted by melatonin
[Did you purposefully cherrypick those two approaches I noted that guide my behaviour and ignore the rest?
[edit on 14-8-2008 by melatonin]
Originally posted by DickieDee
The Atheist is attacked more openly than any other religion.
:
Originally posted by passenger
Yes. Let’s take it that I did. So please explain to me why it makes sense for you, as an Atheist, to act in a manner defined as “good” if it goes your own personal inclination.
You have a very limited amount of existence. Why should you deny yourself anything that you can achieve because of any considerations other than direct punishment? What does it gain you? Who cares, ultimately, if you are good or bad? Everything will cease to exist - including the stars you admire - without any ultimate difference at all.
Let’s look at it this way: By your reasoning, Hitler and Jesus met the same fate. Mother Teresa and Elizabeth Bathory are in the same place. Charles Manson gets the same non-reward as Buddah. So why even bother to try and do good? A pat on the back? A gold star?
See, you can’t have it both ways. Either there are standards of morals and judgment which are real and relevant or there are just impressed illusions of proper behavior. I’m saying that if you are an Atheist then you cannot stand on precepts of good or bad, right or wrong because they are completely artificial. It’s all meaningless. Therefore, your concepts of morality are meaningless. Ergo, to follow such meaningless concepts is irrational. Furthermore, if you are obeying such imaginary concepts then you are in fact deceiving yourself as much as the person that believes that a bearded guy in a white robe really cares.
Originally posted by melatonin
I care. Other people care...When it all ceases to exist, I won't care.…For the second part, I bother to try because I care, and know it is in my best interests. I even get a nice fuzzy feeling when I make someone happy, when I help someone, even if this means I lose out in some way.
Originally posted by melatonin
It is not meaningless.
Originally posted by melatonin
Me: I don't kill people because… I think it would be wrong unless I had no other choice, it would probably make me feel real bad.
Originally posted by melatonin
You: you don't kill people because some imaginary god said it was bad (probably in some old mouldy book), and he wouldn't be happy. However, if he said it was good, then it would be fine - that is, totally externalised morals. I just hope this thing doesn't have a hotline to your mind.
Originally posted by passenger
So why bother to care now? This shows irrational thought. Ultimately, according to your creed, there is nothing to care about. In the final sum, you - or anyone else - is worth no more than a dog turd. You can’t have it both ways. Either things really mean something or they don’t.
Because it gives you a “nice fuzzy feeling”? Why is your “nice fuzzy feeling” any different or somehow superior to the belief that good behavior provides eternal rewards? You are merely transposing a belief in temporal good for eternal good. You are deluding yourself as much as any believer in the afterlife.
Ahhhh. Here we see the crux of the problem of the Atheist: the Ego. It always intrudes. The Atheist wants to smugly believe that, somehow, they are above it all. That like to tell themselves that they have a true, rational and stoic view of reality. But ask them if they would like to watch a loved one be butchered in front of their eyes and the stoicism fades. Ask them if you can have all their possessions and the illusory sense of all things being equal dissolves. Ask them to participate in something repugnant and the mask falls. Why? Somehow, they still feel that they are something special. Why is that? Why the sense of “meaning”? Again, and again, FOR WHAT END?
Bad? What is bad? There is no good or bad. There is only now. There are only occurrences. There are only causes and results. Good and bad are illusions. They are as much illusions as an afterlife. They have no basis in reality as they are only individual beliefs. As an Atheist you must surely accept that. For example, you may think that murdering someone is bad but I may think it is good. Where do you come to the conclusion that it is wrong? What are your standards for judgment?
Here it is: the Big Mistake. A jump to conclusions based on assumptions based on preconditioned thought patterns with automatic defense systems built in. Classic. Can you provide me with some evidence where I said I believed in some imaginary God? Go ahead, you made the accusation - back it up! You can't use any religion to throw into my face. Nice try at extricatng yourself with a holy hand-grenade but I don't have any religious beliefs to attack. Try again. And as for “externalised”(sic) morals….ummmm...how are they in any way different than internalized morals?
Originally posted by melatonin
We give things meaning. To us, they really mean something. This is getting pretty tedious. ?
Originally posted by melatonin
As a society, we come together and determine what we think is right and wrong, using our intuitive sentiments and reason...My standards of judgement come from what I consider most effective for society.
Originally posted by melatonin
Heh, are you some sort of anarchistic agnostic sociopathic libertarian or something?
Originally posted by melatonin
No [sic] needed, the z is one of the american bastardisations of english. Suppose it was too difficult to spell with the 's' for some.
Originally posted by melatonin
I don't need to back it up.
Originally posted by melatonin
Perhaps it's all a preconditioned thought pattern with automatic defence systems... I like to try to make sense from the apparently non-sensical.
Originally posted by melatonin
There is a difference between external and internal motivation. It is a similar difference to those who feel racism is bad because social norms say so, and those who feel it is bad because they personally believe it to be so.
Originally posted by passenger
Ok. So how is your contrived “meaning” any different than the fantasy constructs of religious types? They are both based on artificial standards. Both entail inductive reasoning. The Atheistic viewpoint must admit that ultimately there is going to be nothing. Therefore everything is eventually worth nothing. It is a zero sum game. No winners or losers, no right or wrong. The results of any given action are utterly meaningless. So why try and pretend to give it any meaning at all? That’s deluding oneself. Delusion is a sign of mental illness. If you can explain why anything should have "meaning" I would gladly listen.
That’s fine and it is logical from the perspective of willing engagement in an established social construct that ensures the welfare of the greatest portion. But if the psychopath refuses to participate and follows their own personal judgment, what difference does it really make? If a psychopath cuts someone’s throat, so what? Soon the killer will be dust. Soon the victim will be dust. Soon society will be dust. Soon the whole Universe will be dust. In the great scheme of things it really makes no difference. So why even concern oneself with such actions at all?
Ouch. You may have touched something there, I admit. I couldn’t honestly answer that one without consulting a therapist. I’m going to let that one lie for a while.
Ok. You got that one. I apologize for my cultural bias. USA! USA! But I refuse to say “shed-yule”. No way. We fought wars to keep that kind of thing out of our country.
Well, that certainly settles that. I’m rubber you are glue… Nah..Nah
At this point, I was expecting a bit more than that from you. That was disappointing to read.
So why is that any different or superior than those that like to construct a religious system in order to make sense of a nonsensical world? Without an ultimate standard there can be no logical sense to anything. It’s all just stuff that happens and none of it really matters.
Rubbish. Every internal motivation is created by an external motivation. Some societies promote certain behaviors and some don’t. Those who believe that they have an isolated belief that is entirely independent are wrong. We like to tell ourselves that we have truly unique and original thoughts but they are simply reconstructions of paradigms that we have been exposed to. We all do it. You may choose within a certain group of possibilities but none of the choices you make are in any way truly “yours”. They have all been pre-programmed or thrust upon you at some point.
Again, I find it interesting that you use terms of morality and emotion repeatedly. I stand by the assertion that they are artificial. They are simply memes created in order to ensure a measure of cooperation amongst beasts that could have other selfish inclinations. Religion is a beneficial meme in that it promotes long-term control based on the premise that actions have a lasting effect. Atheism makes no sense in that, by definition, everything is ephemeral. Yet you are saying that you believe in making sense and order out of an inconsequential existence and are experiencing emotional and moral motivations for doing so.
Furthermore, if you are doing so then you are deluding yourself. An Atheist making moral judgments is the equivalent of arguing about the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin. You are believing in illusions and fantasy, i.e. emotions and morals, just as much as the person that believes in a warm fuzzy god in the sky.
Originally posted by passenger
I find that people that like to cast the aspersion of “troll” usually are themselves of that ilk: people that want to blast others with heated and unreasoned argument. Trolls are those that think loudly repeating the same statement without responding to inquiries is valid debate. I haven’t seen you do that at all so why would I call you a troll?
That’s what I am trying to get an answer to: Where does the sense of doing “good” make any sense at all? Why bother to behave when you only have to be able to hide an action for the amount of time you live? Why bother to care what anyone else thinks or feels? I’d like to hear a devoted Atheist tell me why these things make any difference at all.