This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Clinton Angers Iran




Topic started on 6-5-2008 @ 06:01 AM by AbsoluteLegend


Clinton Angers Iran


news.bbc.co.uk

Tehran has complained to the UN about remarks made last week by Hillary Clinton on the circumstances under which the US might attack Iran.

The Democratic presidential hopeful said last week the US could "totally obliterate" Iran if it attacked Israel.
(visit the link for the full news article)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 06:01 AM by AbsoluteLegend


I don't think anything Clinton has to say will 'deter' Iran from attacking Israel. Clinton even suggesting this will only make matters worse in the area. I somehow don't think that a US presidential candidates opinion will somehow resolve issues between Iran and Israel.

news.bbc.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 06:17 AM by Harlequin


Iran won`t attack israel - just look at history - iran has allways been the one defending from aggression - even the us supported iraq invasion to start the iran-iraq war



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 06:28 AM by AbsoluteLegend


Who knows... as they say you can only poke a dog for so long before it bites back. I think that Iran has the potential to strike out against Isreal. The Mid-East is an unpredictable place at the best of times and I don't think that history will have much bearing if Iran is provoked for much longer.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 06:56 AM by 123space


You know AbsoluteLegend thats a problem people like you in pentagon # os so hard ,more in cia too .peoples like you creates illusion & creates fear .if i REMEMBER people like you creates atmosphere before Iraq war TELL ME WHERE ARE WMD. IF YOU CALL CAMEL # A W.M.D WELL THEN YOU FIND LOTS OF THEM IN IRAQ TOO.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 07:10 AM by Harlequin


reply to post by AbsoluteLegend



try this : when iraq was using WMD`s against iran did they retaliate in kind ? or just use superior tactics to drive back the enemy?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 07:17 AM by Agit8dChop


Why in the world, would Iran launch an attack on Israel?
C'mon, im sick of hearing this like its gospel..

What makes you think IRan is going to be the aggressor?

What, because CNN, FOX and the Israeli media says so?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 07:39 AM by AbsoluteLegend


First and foremost, never once did I say that Iran WILL attack Israel I merely suggested it as a possibility. As for 123Spaces how well do you know me exactly?? It seems you are quick to catergorise people given their beliefs and opinions, thus creating undue hysteria...perhaps you are more like the 'people' in the CIA and pentagon you so fondly speak of!
All I was suggesting is that current events don't neccasarily follow a pattern dictated by history.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 07:47 AM by marg6043


The Israel Iran decimation is getting old and is nothing more than a propaganda tactic to gain support for a strike eventually by !!!!!Yes Israel!!!!!! and not the other way around against Iran with US support.

Clinton is trying to match McCain when it comes to dealing with the rest of the world, even if their words are empty and full of BS.

This about A woman showing that she can have as big or bigger cojones that her male counterparts.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 08:13 AM by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal


Well, at least what clinton says is true. What is Iran going to do? Lob missiles? If they have nukes then they're a threat. Any ground movement would be torn apart by U.S. and allied air superiority. How would any successful follow through after an initial attack be possible in the first place? It's true, they WOULD be obliterated... do I want war? No! But I can't argue with what she's saying here. Does it make anything better? Not really. Worse? Maybe... who knows, it's a toss up. I'm not in the leader's minds at this moment, are any of us?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.090 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory