It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deltaboy
I've seen law enforcement officers carry AR15s. Submachine guns are just peashooters compare to that.
In the first counterterrorism strategy of its kind in the nation, roving teams of New York City police officers armed with automatic rifles and accompanied by bomb-sniffing dogs will patrol the city’s subway system daily, beginning next month, officials said on Friday.
Under a tactical plan called Operation Torch, the officers will board trains and patrol platforms, focusing on sites like Pennsylvania Station, Herald Square, Columbus Circle, Rockefeller Center and Times Square in Manhattan, and Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn.
Officials said the operation would begin in March.
www.nytimes.com...
Originally posted by Howie47
Any real terrorist threat, simply work round, (known) defensives. Like in the (1974?) Olympics!
Unless this is supposed to make the dumb public feel safe. It is a total waste of money. Unless, as I said it is for a more diabolical purpose!
Originally posted by CX
Originally posted by Maxmars
Can you imagine the next incident where cops kill an unarmed person by 'mistake'? Hundred's of rounds instead of dozens.
Contrary to what appears to be public opinion, most of these weapons have a single shot and semi auto option, and believe it or not the officers who carry these weapons are actualy trained to use that option.
Not sure i can remember the last time i heard of a cop spraying anyone with automatic fire like they do in the movies.
Mention the word "machine gun" and i'm sure some people think you'll have the cops stood there at the end of the platform with a big .50 cal spraying the crowds of commmuters!
CX.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by Howie47
Any real terrorist threat, simply work round, (known) defensives. Like in the (1974?) Olympics!
Unless this is supposed to make the dumb public feel safe. It is a total waste of money. Unless, as I said it is for a more diabolical purpose!
Are you suggesting that security measures are a waste of money because terrorists can outwit the police?
Sometimes, this kind of show of force is a deterrent that would make the subway a less desirable target, since soft targets are the terrorists' preference.
Then, of course, this is not the only operation to defeat terrorism. It's just one of the more obvious.
[edit on 2008/4/24 by GradyPhilpott]
Originally posted by TruthWithin
Anyone ever ride the A train at 2am?
A cop with a machine gun would actually be a welcomed site - well- at least more welcomed then getting stabbed by a crackhead.
reply to post by GradyPhilpott
At any rate, the M-4 is a carbine, not a submachine gun.
reply to post by GradyPhilpott
Are you suggesting that security measures are a waste of money because terrorists can outwit the police?
What part of "(known) security measures", did you not understand?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Dog sniffs out a guy with explosives in his backpack, cops ask for it, guy takes off, cops load him up with their MP5's ...
Originally posted by Maxmars
I'm not actually arguing against your point here, but 'soft target' is a media term to me. Targets are neither soft or hard, they are either opportune or not.
Originally posted by Maxmars
You raise a valid point. It would be interesting to hear, from a terrorist him/herself, whether the visibility of armed police/paramilitary actually is a 'deterrent' for them. I can say it would make a difference to me, but then I don't have the 'glorious death of a martyr' as my 'prize.'
But at the end of the day, it's population they are frightening, not the terrorists.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Originally posted by Maxmars
You raise a valid point. It would be interesting to hear, from a terrorist him/herself, whether the visibility of armed police/paramilitary actually is a 'deterrent' for them. I can say it would make a difference to me, but then I don't have the 'glorious death of a martyr' as my 'prize.'
A big, visibly armed deterrent sure didn't stop the guys who put a big honkin' hole in the USS Cole.
But at the end of the day, it's population they are frightening, not the terrorists.
I think that's really the whole point. Now the real question is, will there now be an attack that "coincidentally" happens at the exact same time police are conducting anti-terror exercises, just like 9/11 and the London bombing?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
But for those who intent of other types of terrorism the high profile security might work.
Originally posted by Maxmars
But what happens when you are ordered to do harm to your next door neighbor's boyfriend, or you're classmate's Dad? I just can't picture that going over without a hitch.