Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
yes, let's encourage immature machismo of taking statements out of context for the purpose of an infantile attempt to defame.
con has no argument, so he's doing something to show it. he's given up the rational discussion.
sure, i could retaliate with quite a few of his statements, but i prefer to go for the arguments, not the person.
madd they are quotes! That was all! How can you say they are out of context when they haven't been said in the context of any argument? Do they
embarrass you? You can quote anything I have said madd I would be honored. I just never say anything so fathoms deep as,,, well allow me to
demonstrate why I don't see how they can be taken out of context.
You said; "Atheists have no belief"
Then you said: "I don't preach Atheism, I am just telling people about it"
If you have no belief,, What in Gods name are you telling them about??
So don't accuse me of taking anything out of context when the context contradicts itself in the same sentence.
Again, like wraoth has said and Ashley and now Gormely,, it is YOU that has the problem. If you can't stand seeing your own sound bytes, the same
ones I have seen you use again and again,, then I figure maybe seeing them rotate before your eyes, you would see what we have all been trying to tell
you. That when someone says tells a Christian that Atheism is not a religion by twisting the meaning of Theology taking out from the sublist of
theistic branches of religion and philosphy,, you are doing it to confuse them. Theologians who study Religion and Philosophy know the of those
religions come subsect theistic and Non theistic.
That means I don't tell someone Religion is the belief in God which is Theism, and since we don't believe in God we have no Religion hence the
"A" in A-Theism.
That isn't Right though,, you see they are ALL religions and divided by their theistic philosophy. "Pan-Theism" is one Mono-Theism is another, the
distinction is not whether one is a Religion and one is not for they ALL ARE Theistic, and it is the "theism" that designates it a religion while
the Greek or Latin part in front describes God type Gods type or no God type. Theism is a God Religion and A-theism is a Godless one but they are BOTH
theism's. Otherwise, start calling yourselves Non Theistic having no ideology no worldview or Philosophy what so ever.
They won't do that though because we all know they have a worldview.
So I Imagine by now you have alerted the Mods (again) that Con is using a signature quoting Maddness (no pun) and for some reason (as i know you
can't explain why) some reason it bothers you.
For some reason it bothers you when you see yourself say "I have never been beat on this forum" or that you were calling a post names and not the
person who wrote it. Like you did calling wroath post a troll.
BTW, Madd,, Wraoths post wanted me to tell you,, "sticks and stones".
You know I read the rules on the signature I had and I really have no idea how it could have been in violation when I took pains to make sure they
were your best and most thought provocative while at the same time making sure they had no expletives or personal attacks.
Unless seeing my own logic, posted in a sig made me want to eat my very own words,, I would be un ashamed as you should be you big lug.
I mean I could have used the quotes that led up to you accusing me of calling you a Homosexual as if it was some kind of accusation. When as we BOTH
know,, those quotes I could have taken in their full page context and everyone would see how you just couldn't believe the FBI would do such a thing
as take Atheist websites down for the hate and porn they had.
Now I will agree before you jump the gun like you do,, I agree the FBI doing that,, is rather questionable but to just slam me because you are never
wrong and accuse me of lies three or four times in one post?
Now Madd,, which is why when you sent me that U2U calling me spitefull challening my masculinity or insisting that I have a vendetta against you.
I got to ask myself?? Who is the only one that has anything, any belief to actively attack? Which one of us, has the only belief in something?
Which of one of us got called a liar for not being able to prove the FBI took sites down asking me to show you the site.
Which one of us got called a liar for not being able to show the site that was no longer there? Yeah and do you know why I couldn't show you the
The FBI took them down THAT'S why.
That doesn't mean you can start calling me a homophobe a bigot or use more of those convoluted excuses to as you put it ,, merely used a creative way
to explain why my suppositions were lies or made up.
Because they come from my rectum?
I got to say,, YOU might call it creative, I call it like, I see it
Furthermore, when it comes down to it, that has always been, what you have against me.
You see mad I DENY Ignorance while you,, someone I have apologised to on several occasions when I was wrong yet my Apology went Un-accepted because as
we discover you don't forgive either.
Therefore, don't send me U2U's asking me if there is more wrong with me or am I just spiteful. You messaged ME,, I didn't message you.
You have not ever said you were sorry to me even when it was suggested by Ashley, and albeit I would accept it,, I don't expect it.
You cannot admit being wrong and is why I don't bother debating someone like that. It is also why I wanted you to see your very words rotate "I
have never been beat" I bet that looked pretty arrogant didn't it.
Then again would anyone be surprised,,, if you said no.
It's ok madd,, like I said,,
I deny Ignorance,,
while you deny,