It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nablator
reply to post by Balez
In the first two seconds there is something moving in the top left corner... not sure what's so interesting there. Later we see spinning debris, no surprise. We don't know how big they are. They could be some of the objects, bigger than about 4 inches, tracked by NASA.
100,000 Pieces Of Trash In Space Poses No Shortage Of Risks
So in your mind what would classify as an intelligently controlled object?
Obviously objects that can change direction on their own aren’t enough evidence, even if they’re two miles in diameter or some how happen to appear out of nowhere.
Seriously, I’m sure you’ve looked these videos enough times to have already made up your mind, but can you actually say that everything you’ve seen regarding the NASA footage is just normal and to be expected debris?
Originally posted by Balez
The first object comes from the lower right corner and moves up to the upper left corner, it reflects the station (MIR, ISS?).
That i think is interesting....
Are those our experiments or are we studying someone else's presence up there?
The eventual change of position of debris depends on the way they were created.
Originally posted by andre18firstly, Debris for what ever reason don’t just stay in one position do they – no, they fly in space in continues free fall…these objects and many others don’t seem to move at all…
Why should there be collisions between debris? The only way of that happening would be for the debris to come from two (or more) origins, if you break something the debris do not move against each other, and that is not because we are not in space.
Secondly, out of all the vids so far shown on this thread not a SINGLE object has crashed into another, you’d expect at least once or twice but by some miracle they seem to avoid each other….
By definition, any group of objects will be in a formation. If you do mean a geometrically precise formation, then those objects are not in one those, they look just like a group of objects. If you get a handful of pieces of bread and throw them in a river they will be in a moving formation but they are not under the control of any intelligence.
Thirdly, the formation of these particular objects are in a, well, a formation… with not a single one bumping into each other or moving the slightest.
And why should there be any intelligence behind it? Do you think that clouds are intelligently controlled objects? They do appear out of nowhere, they move on formations or they stay in the same place, but, as far as I know, they are not under intelligent control.
And lastly, an object appears out of nowhere which is larger then the other objects and remains motionless in the centre of the formation surrounding it…..
I don't want to prove you wrong, I just want to make you see that you may be wrong by assuming that what you don't understand has to have an intelligence behind it.
All these reasons surely point to intelligently controlled objects, if you would like to attempt to prove me wrong – be my guest..
Originally posted by andre18
And this.....well this is what I like to call - getting owned
3:25 please explain – object obviously changing direction and slowing down after changing direction
4:15 again please explain.....
4:30 large object is moving – 4:50 appears to have completely stopped while other objects are still moving.
5:36 object appears out of nowhere
6:21 object appears out of nowhere from the right
[edit on 30-3-2008 by andre18]
Originally posted by ArMaP
The eventual change of position of debris depends on the way they were created.
Originally posted by andre18firstly, Debris for what ever reason don’t just stay in one position do they – no, they fly in space in continues free fall…these objects and many others don’t seem to move at all…
If something breaks on the space shuttle, for example, the resulting debris will keep on moving (mostly) as the shuttle was moving.
On the other hand, if the debris are the result of a collision between two satellites, then they will move in all directions.
Debris from a geostationary satellite will have a tendency to keep on the same geostationary orbit, looking like they are not moving at all when compared to the shuttle, that completes an orbit in 90 minutes, I think.
Also, there may be other things in space besides intelligently controlled objects and debris.
Why should there be collisions between debris? The only way of that happening would be for the debris to come from two (or more) origins, if you break something the debris do not move against each other, and that is not because we are not in space.
Secondly, out of all the vids so far shown on this thread not a SINGLE object has crashed into another, you’d expect at least once or twice but by some miracle they seem to avoid each other….
By definition, any group of objects will be in a formation. If you do mean a geometrically precise formation, then those objects are not in one those, they look just like a group of objects. If you get a handful of pieces of bread and throw them in a river they will be in a moving formation but they are not under the control of any intelligence.
Thirdly, the formation of these particular objects are in a, well, a formation… with not a single one bumping into each other or moving the slightest.
And why should there be any intelligence behind it? Do you think that clouds are intelligently controlled objects? They do appear out of nowhere, they move on formations or they stay in the same place, but, as far as I know, they are not under intelligent control.
And lastly, an object appears out of nowhere which is larger then the other objects and remains motionless in the centre of the formation surrounding it…..
I don't want to prove you wrong, I just want to make you see that you may be wrong by assuming that what you don't understand has to have an intelligence behind it.
All these reasons surely point to intelligently controlled objects, if you would like to attempt to prove me wrong – be my guest..
People may have thought in the past that lightnings, thunders, earthquakes, etc. had an intelligence behind them, but now we have a different understanding of things, although that does not mean that we know all there is to be know, far from it.
And lastly, an object appears out of nowhere which is larger then the other objects and remains motionless in the centre of the formation surrounding it…..
And why should there be any intelligence behind it? Do you think that clouds are intelligently controlled objects? They do appear out of nowhere, they move on formations or they stay in the same place, but, as far as I know, they are not under intelligent control.
Originally posted by andre18
And lastly, an object appears out of nowhere which is larger then the other objects and remains motionless in the centre of the formation surrounding it…
For bloody sake an object magically appears out of now - that's pretty amazing for ice debris
Even in the video ‘Alien Abduct’ pointed out, there’s another object appearing at 5:36 out of nowhere…..dude…please explain.
So, do you think that appearing without any previous clue to an observer is a sign of intelligence?
Does this means that the cloud is intelligently controlled?
I didn't said (or at least that was not my intention) that the clouds make objects look like they appear and disappear, I said the clouds appear and disappear.
Originally posted by andre18
The difference is there are no clouds to cause objects to look like they've appeared and then disappeared - in space there isn't anything like that.
It makes sense, only you do not agree with it.
Don’t give an example like “I could be the shadow of the shuttle, making small ice particles appear / disappear from view.” Because as I explained no other objects were affected by the shuttle’s shadow – it just makes no sense….