It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigbert81
and assuming that McCain is better than the rest because of it, is just another fanciful excuse as to not show any support for Obama.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by TheBandit795
Would it not be true to say that ALL candidates are compromised?[/url]
Originally posted by Chaoticar
play an Obama speech, and compare that with one of Hitler's -
Originally posted by TheBandit795
www.politics1.com...
Obama is definately out - because he doesn't have enough experience to get the job done
what he is calling for, financially, isn't fair and this country can't afford.
Originally posted by bigbert81
how ignorant that statement is.
It's pretty obvious you didn't read my last post reply
I cannot seem to find any information to back up your claims about a shotty economic plan.
Originally posted by bigbert81
It sounds like more information from Fox News if you ask me.
Originally posted by bigbert81
you give me ...
Oh, and ...
JFK and Lincoln,
Obama has held an elected office longer than Hillary, has more legislative experience, been in the Senate longer.
Obama was right about Pakistan while Clinton called him 'naive'.
Obama's and Hillary's voting records are near identical, except Obama voted AGAINST the war.
McCain's experience tells him he wants a perpetual war.
I tell you what, if 'experience' breeds people like Hillary Clinton or John McCain, give me someone with none.
TONS of good info
Uh .. no.
Sen. Hillary Clinton said that Obama's foreign policy views were "irresponsible and frankly naive."
No they aren't. Obama refuses to vote and just says "present" AND he wasn't even in office to be able to vote for or against the war. So he couldn't have voted against the war. He wasn't even there.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Don't assume anything! I haven't decided who to vote for. I liked a lot that Ron Paul said. But seeing as he won't make it .. I'm stuck with either Hillary or McCain. Obama is definately out - because he doesn't have enough experience to get the job done AND what he is calling for, financially, isn't fair and this country can't afford.
None of them give me the warm fuzzies about border security.
Hillary's health plan is better than Obama's but McCain is right about private care.
I don't like Obama or Hillary and their 'big government' nanny states.
I don't like Hillary's baggage (white water, vince foster, missing WH silverware ...etc)
I don't like Obama embracing a racist and an anti-American (he HAS to share the views or else he wouldn't have been able to stomach the freak)
I could go on forever with the 'I don't like .._________' list.
Originally posted by bigbert81
And of course, Lincoln and Kennedy did more bad than good now.
Another 'experience gone bad' story. She's been lying since her start.
Uhhh-yes.
Where was the 'outloud' thing?
it is bothersome that Hillary DID vote for it.
And as far as the 'Present' vote, that is a strategy used in the Illinois Senate.
Hurry along now little one, you've got some brushing up to do.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
Ron Paul is the best candidate running,
it seems you have already nominated Hillary for the Democratic candidate.
doesn't Hillary's plan sound more 'nanny-like'?
you might start to say something good about Obama...
Maybe you live in a world where your acquaintances are required to agree with your views, but I do not.
I support Obama for two simple reasons: he's honest. He's being attacked by both parties.
doesn't Hillary's plan sound more 'nanny-like'?
Could be ... but Obama's leaves people out. I'm able to be swayed on this .. my mind hasn't been fully made up.
I pick my close friends better than that. And if someone spews hate and/or anti-americanisms like that then I dont' bother with them. YES .. my close friends are required to agree with my view of not being racist pigs and anti-Americans.
Okay - lets discuss honest. He's lied about his stand on the war. He's flip flopped back and forth and at one point even admits to having held the same position as Bush and yet he claims that he's always been anti-war.
Tony Rezko. Honest? hmmmm ...
McCain has gone out of his way to be nice to the guy. He got on someone for using Obama's middle name (which I don't understand since it IS his middle name) and he has gotten on people for giving Obama a hard time about Wright.
Even if he were being attacked by republicans - so what? The way this country is set up is that we have opposing parties who are supposed to show that they are better than the other one. This isn't a hand holding spiritual moment kind of thing ... it's a political thing and we are supposed to scrub down and get all the facts out.
Question - when the dems start picking on McCain, will you switch sides and give him your sympathy vote?