Originally posted by psylence1
To me it begins and ends here:
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." -Declaration of Independence
There is a legitimate argument that supports our being "reduced under absolute Despotism" or at least on our way, and one doesn't have to look very hard to establish a list of "abuses and usurpations". Perhaps Montana is one of the few states with the stones to let the federal government know that among other constitutional and fundementally accepted forms of recourse, they do have the right, in fact the duty, to throw off such a government.
Ok...Help me out here you guys...
Let's say that the people of the US decide to stand up and demand that those words in the Declaration is enforced and that the government is to be replaced.
Do you think that this is possible? I mean with the current people in office and current policies wouldn't all of the people be considered terrorists? I think the Pres. WOULD commit troops to deal with the issue and that seems like (to me) that it could get awful bloody.
The whole thing is really scarey deep down because of the strength the gov has now and the power over it's people. The current administration neither cares for or fears the people that put them there in the first place.
Absolute power is a scarey thing.
Very interesting times we are living in


