Why is Lear no longer a consp. Master?, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 35 times


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 05:04 PM by Palasheea




reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 05:07 PM by thehumbleone
reply to post by scientist



I believe Skeptic Overlord and Co. have done the right thing by putting a stop to Lear's shenanigans.

I mean seriously, he's the only member I know who could get away with all the false info and conspiracies he posted without getting banned.


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 05:08 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by buddhasystem



The knife cuts both ways.

And while we're cherry picking quotes let's not forget this one:

Originally posted by goosdawg
This entire situation is pathetic, IMHO, and it is a disgrace to what I thought this forum stood for.


I find it interesting that you should be so quick to jump to the defense of the ad hominem attackers, why would that be?

All such behavior should not be tolerated, from any of the parties involved.

Originally posted by buddhasystem
Moderators did their jobs. The bulk of the discussion and critique was directed at John's material...


I disagree.

There are events of which, apparently, even you are ignorant, more's the pity.

Originally posted by buddhasystem
I personally won't miss him but I understand you will.


I am not the only one, and I am proud to be counted among their number.


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 05:13 PM by Kellter
reply to post by yankeerose



Yankee, I don't think John was "Banned" per say. There was apparently a public spat between Conspiracy Masters that appeared to be getting out of hand so all parties were temporarily Post Banned till they could cool down. During that time, John told the owners he wasn't coming back to ATS ever again (probably a heat of the moment reaction). In response to that, figuring he wasn't coming back, he was removed as a conspiracy master.

After all was cooled down the Post Ban was lifted for all involved so they could respond.

At least thats the way I understand based on the owner's posts.

I hope John decides to stay, I liked him.

edit spelling

[edit on 4-2-2008 by Kellter]


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 05:15 PM by Navieko
Any "baiting" or first strike -- was done by those asking questions in which they knew very well he could not answer to their liking. If he says he believes that many of the planets in our solar system are inhabited on a thread or forum -- must mean he has 100% solid evidence that would convince even you? Obviously if the evidence was that freaking great, he'd present it in a much larger way for everyone to see. Get a clue and have some common sense. It's that sort of disrespectful ignorance 'innocently' thrown at Mr. Lear all the time, that makes him reply/not reply the way he does. He's no more disrespectful then what respect was shown to him in the first place. Mr. Lear has stated MANY times that what he claims, are only his opinion. He DOES NOT have to repeat this in every single post he makes and any attack on that particular regard -- is baiting and nothing short of trolling. These people know very well who they are and what they were doing... and I find it quite hard to believe that the staff of ATS could not see this. Pretending to be ignorant in order to draw a desired response, so that the grounds/reason for attack are laid -- should be punnishable.

I don't think it's very difficult to see who is genuine and who is trolling -- and there is such a thing as trolling without breaking the T&C. This needs to be addressed by the ownership -- otherwise it will lead to the eventual downfull of ATS. And that would be a shame.

[edit on 4/2/08 by Navieko]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^