It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tifozi
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
A thermal inversion is like oil on water. If you move it, it will dissipate (in MOST CASES lol).
[edit on 21/9/09 by Tifozi]
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
your assuming the radar operatoers interpreted the radar readings correctly. How do you know they werent picking up 2 diffirent false reads at diffirent times and thinking they were the same "object"
Tifozi- peral harbor December 1941, The BOLA Feb 1942.
Originally posted by yeti101
well it looks like the skeptics are remaining skeptical on this one.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
Actually, you made an error in your speed calculations. The elapsed time between the initial fix and the time the return was lost three miles offshore was 27 minutes not 21 minutes.
Originally posted by Phage
Assuming the 120 mile figure is accurate (I'm always a bit suspicious of round numbers in cases like this), that would make the speed 260 mph.
Originally posted by Phage
BTW, did you know the submarine which shelled Ellwood carried a reconnaissance aircraft?
No. That makes no sense. What possible use would a glider be? How would it be launched? How far could it fly, so what use would it be for recon? Also, gliders do not "move at the speed of the wind". When evaluating the possibility you should display a bit more knowledge about the subject.
Why yes, as I've explained before in this thread, it carried a glider. A glider that moved at the speed of the wind.
No.
also, to your response to Tifozi, that's the point Yeti, Pearl Harbor was BEFORE this event. Radar operators were VERY well trained in the US after Pearl Harbor...
www.ibiblio.org...
damning indictment of our whole warning service.
Originally posted by Phage
No. That makes no sense. What possible use would a glider be? How would it be launched? How far could it fly, so what use would it be for recon? Also, gliders do not "move at the speed of the wind". When evaluating the possibility you should display a bit more knowledge about the subject.
Why yes, as I've explained before in this thread, it carried a glider. A glider that moved at the speed of the wind.
Originally posted by Phage
The I-17 which shelled Ellwood was a B-1 class sub. The aircraft carried by B-1's was the Yokosuka E14Y1. Not capable of 260mph but I'm still calling the radar reports highly suspect anyway. No, I'm not claiming the Glen was what was being shot at. But there is a possibility it was the source of the radar contact if it was a real contact.
www.skylighters.org...
The unit's heart was the oscilloscope that gave a picture similar to a heart monitor in hospitals today. The operator would move the antenna through a given arc until the line across the bottom showed a small spike or pip. By adjusting the antenna and the controls, the pip was enhanced until the operator could tell the approximate distance to the target. Next, the operator looked out the window to a plate mounted on the antenna base, with an arrow on it that would give the direction of the contact. Unlike today's radar scopes, the antenna did not oscillate and there was no constant repainting of the picture on the scope. This system did not tell an incoming target's altitude, its size or number, nor did it differentiate friend from foe.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I do believe that initial fire may have been directed at a balloon. I believe the subsequent fire was directed at nothing but smoke and searchlight beams.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
www.historynet.com...
I immediately reported to our regimental commanding officer, Colonel Ray Watson, that the guns were firing at our balloon and that there were no aircraft in sight
Watson sent out the order that none of the 203rd’s 3-inch guns were to fire, then notified the Flower Street Control Room of what was happening. Astonishingly, the order came back from Flower Street to shoot down the balloon.
Phage is willing to believe that's a possibility, and so am I, but some people are not. They feel it's impossible for the soldiers to have continued firing at nothing but AA fire smoke and searchlight beams once the balloons were shot down.
Originally posted by yeti101
So what happened to the target when it was lost? I presume you think it switched on some cloaking device then switched it off 25 mins later. I'm sure you'll make any excuse to keep your version of events intact.
Then we have the account brought by arbitarguer that the AA fire was triggered by the shooting down of the balloon. What evidence is there against this ? I wonder what excuse you will find to dismiss this WFA
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
Thanks, I had done a bit of research already. Did you notice the range of the SCR268? 22 miles.
Originally posted by Phage
There is no indication in the 0144 report (the report from three stations) of the location of the reported target but considering the range of the SCR268 radar it would have been somewhere very close to Los Angeles
Originally posted by Phage
(we don't know if it was over land or sea but it was certainly not 120 miles away).
Originally posted by Phage
There is no indication that it was the same target reported at 0200.
Originally posted by Phage
There is no indication that any more than a single unit participated in the tracking of the target toward shore.