It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
Just because someone in Afghanistan is carrying a rifle does not make them a terrorist.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by BlueRaja
If they'd been rounded up while having a egg mcmuffin and some hash browns, without probable cause, I'd share your view.
There is no MickeyD's in Afghanistan. (At least there wasn't anyway.)
Either you have no concept of the regular lifestyle in rugged Afghanistan, and no recollection of its history, or you are deliberately stinking up this thread. Just because someone in Afghanistan is carrying a rifle does not make them a terrorist. And you can look back in the thread where I already explained the uniform issue as well.
Keep in mind, once again, that the US invaded Afghanistan. The common people had little to no idea it was coming. One day they're out herding goats, the next day they are being inveded by a superpower again.
These folks with rifles(or whatever other weapon they may have had), were rounded up at the scene where a military exchange had occurred. Does it not seem reasonable that the likelihood that they were just some poor armed schmo, in the wrong place, is low? How long are POWs normally held during a conflict, looking back into historical settings? Is there any historical precedant for POWs using the US court system, and the military having to prove that every enemy prisoner is guilty?
He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
Once the system is totally swept away (by an orchestrated disaster) these crazy ass prisons where nobody is tried and you're imprisoned indefinitely will suddenly be the new home of American patriots who refuse to roll over for the Fourth Reich.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!
Patrick Henry - March 23, 1775
Originally posted by Blaine91555
and yes, people who enslave or murder innocent civilians due to their fanatical Religious beliefs are Animals.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
They are POWs. They aren't accused of robbing a liquor store. They were apprehended after fighting with US forces. What is being established is their level of guilt, not whether they are guilty.
Guantanamo Detainees Are Not Human Beings
Originally posted by BlueRaja
They receive food, shelter, medical care, time for religious activities, just like any other POWs from previous conflicts.
Interrogators violated regulations when:
A female touched detainees inappropriately and smeared them with a substance described as menstrual blood, but which was fake blood
Interrogators threatened to go after a detainee's family
Duct tape was used to bind the head and mouth of a detainee chanting verses of the Koran
The report also found that:
Military staff impersonated FBI and state department interrogators
A detainee was chained to the floor in the foetal position
Cold, heat, loud music and sleep deprivation were used on detainees.
As of Tuesday, 20 of 23 fasting detainees at Guantanamo were being fed liquid meals through flexible tubes inserted through their noses and throats, said Guantanamo spokesman Navy Cmdr. Rick Haupt. The strikers are protesting conditions at the camp and their open-ended confinement.
You're getting wrapped up in semantics.
The term Semite means a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
and those that have done those things have been punished.
But the Southern Command, which runs the base, said Maj Gen Geoffrey Miller had committed no violations.
Michigan Senator Carl Levin, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the report showed there were more than a few isolated cases of abuse.
"It is clear from the report that detainee mistreatment was not simply the product of a few rogue military police in a night shift," he said.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
I as a US citizen, don't want a foreign organization deciding US policy.
I believe it to be the role of the US(or any other nation) government, to look out for its self interest.